A narrative review of Environmentally Oriented Anti-consumption: Definitions, dimensions, and research framework

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
{"title":"A narrative review of Environmentally Oriented Anti-consumption: Definitions, dimensions, and research framework","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the context of political uncertainty, environmental degradation, and resource scarcity, significant changes in individual consumption attitudes underscore the necessity of sustainability and anti-consumption research. Environmentally-oriented anti-consumption (EOA) represents a pivotal research direction that integrates these elements. Utilizing the PRISMA method, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 428 articles. Our findings indicate that while qualitative methods have traditionally been favored, quantitative research is rapidly increasing. However, the dimensions, measurements, and frameworks employed in quantitative research remain fragmented, signaling a need for further refinement in EOA studies. To advance the theoretical framework of EOA, we rigorously selected and systematically analyzed 36 articles. Following identification, refinement, and expert validation, we proposed a comprehensive taxonomy categorizing EOA into seven major types, each with various sub-dimensions and measurement items. Furthermore, we developed a framework to measure the antecedents and consequences of EOA, incorporating motivational explanatory mechanisms. Our research provides a more precise definition and scope of EOA, thereby enhancing academic understanding. It offers novel tools for businesses and policymakers to implement sustainable practices, positioning on target groups through classification and dimensional measurement. This study aligns policies, marketing, and consumer behavior with sustainability goals, promoting societal development and addressing challenges in evolving social and environmental contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924001933","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of political uncertainty, environmental degradation, and resource scarcity, significant changes in individual consumption attitudes underscore the necessity of sustainability and anti-consumption research. Environmentally-oriented anti-consumption (EOA) represents a pivotal research direction that integrates these elements. Utilizing the PRISMA method, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 428 articles. Our findings indicate that while qualitative methods have traditionally been favored, quantitative research is rapidly increasing. However, the dimensions, measurements, and frameworks employed in quantitative research remain fragmented, signaling a need for further refinement in EOA studies. To advance the theoretical framework of EOA, we rigorously selected and systematically analyzed 36 articles. Following identification, refinement, and expert validation, we proposed a comprehensive taxonomy categorizing EOA into seven major types, each with various sub-dimensions and measurement items. Furthermore, we developed a framework to measure the antecedents and consequences of EOA, incorporating motivational explanatory mechanisms. Our research provides a more precise definition and scope of EOA, thereby enhancing academic understanding. It offers novel tools for businesses and policymakers to implement sustainable practices, positioning on target groups through classification and dimensional measurement. This study aligns policies, marketing, and consumer behavior with sustainability goals, promoting societal development and addressing challenges in evolving social and environmental contexts.
以环境为导向的反消费述评:定义、维度和研究框架
在政治不确定性、环境恶化和资源稀缺的背景下,个人消费态度的重大变化凸显了可持续性和反消费研究的必要性。以环境为导向的反消费(EOA)代表了整合这些要素的一个重要研究方向。利用 PRISMA 方法,我们对 428 篇文章进行了全面分析。我们的研究结果表明,虽然定性方法历来受到青睐,但定量研究正在迅速增加。然而,定量研究中采用的维度、测量方法和框架仍然支离破碎,这表明需要进一步完善 EOA 研究。为了推进 EOA 的理论框架,我们严格筛选并系统分析了 36 篇文章。经过识别、完善和专家验证,我们提出了一个全面的分类法,将 EOA 分成七种主要类型,每种类型又有不同的子维度和测量项目。此外,我们还开发了一个框架,用于测量 EOA 的前因后果,并将动机解释机制纳入其中。我们的研究为 EOA 提供了更精确的定义和范围,从而加深了学术界对 EOA 的理解。它为企业和政策制定者实施可持续实践提供了新的工具,通过分类和维度测量对目标群体进行定位。这项研究使政策、营销和消费者行为与可持续发展目标保持一致,促进了社会发展,应对了不断变化的社会和环境背景下的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信