Optimizing air quality and health Co-benefits of mitigation technologies in China: An integrated assessment

IF 14 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
{"title":"Optimizing air quality and health Co-benefits of mitigation technologies in China: An integrated assessment","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ese.2024.100454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Carbon mitigation technologies lead to air quality improvement and health co-benefits, while the practical effects of the technologies are dependent on the energy composition, technological advancements, and economic development. In China, mitigation technologies such as end-of-pipe treatment, renewable energy adoption, carbon capture and storage (CCS), and sector electrification demonstrate significant promise in meeting carbon reduction targets. However, the optimization of these technologies for maximum co-benefits remains unclear. Here, we employ an integrated assessment model (AIM/enduse, CAM-chem, IMED|HEL) to analyze air quality shifts and their corresponding health and economic impacts at the provincial level in China within the two-degree target. Our findings reveal that a combination of end-of-pipe technology, renewable energy utilization, and electrification yields the most promising results in air quality improvement, with a reduction of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) by −34.6 μg m<sup>−3</sup> and ozone by −18.3 ppb in 2050 compared to the reference scenario. In contrast, CCS technology demonstrates comparatively modest improvements in air quality (−9.4 μg m<sup>−3</sup> for PM<sub>2.5</sub> and −2.4 ppb for ozone) and cumulative premature deaths reduction (−3.4 million from 2010 to 2050) compared to the end-of-pipe scenario. Notably, densely populated regions such as Henan, Hebei, Shandong, and Sichuan experience the most health and economic benefits. This study aims to project effective future mitigation technologies and climate policies on air quality improvement and carbon mitigation. Furthermore, it seeks to delineate detailed provincial-level air pollution control strategies, offering valuable guidance for policymakers and stakeholders in pursuing sustainable and health-conscious environmental management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34434,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":14.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498424000681/pdfft?md5=6d217de308e16a7f801b64dbbe1d5def&pid=1-s2.0-S2666498424000681-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498424000681","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon mitigation technologies lead to air quality improvement and health co-benefits, while the practical effects of the technologies are dependent on the energy composition, technological advancements, and economic development. In China, mitigation technologies such as end-of-pipe treatment, renewable energy adoption, carbon capture and storage (CCS), and sector electrification demonstrate significant promise in meeting carbon reduction targets. However, the optimization of these technologies for maximum co-benefits remains unclear. Here, we employ an integrated assessment model (AIM/enduse, CAM-chem, IMED|HEL) to analyze air quality shifts and their corresponding health and economic impacts at the provincial level in China within the two-degree target. Our findings reveal that a combination of end-of-pipe technology, renewable energy utilization, and electrification yields the most promising results in air quality improvement, with a reduction of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) by −34.6 μg m−3 and ozone by −18.3 ppb in 2050 compared to the reference scenario. In contrast, CCS technology demonstrates comparatively modest improvements in air quality (−9.4 μg m−3 for PM2.5 and −2.4 ppb for ozone) and cumulative premature deaths reduction (−3.4 million from 2010 to 2050) compared to the end-of-pipe scenario. Notably, densely populated regions such as Henan, Hebei, Shandong, and Sichuan experience the most health and economic benefits. This study aims to project effective future mitigation technologies and climate policies on air quality improvement and carbon mitigation. Furthermore, it seeks to delineate detailed provincial-level air pollution control strategies, offering valuable guidance for policymakers and stakeholders in pursuing sustainable and health-conscious environmental management.

Abstract Image

优化中国空气质量和缓解技术的健康共同效益:综合评估
碳减排技术可以改善空气质量,带来健康方面的共同效益,而技术的实际效果则取决于能源构成、技术进步和经济发展。在中国,末端治理、采用可再生能源、碳捕集与封存(CCS)和行业电气化等减排技术在实现碳减排目标方面大有可为。然而,如何优化这些技术以获得最大的共同效益仍不清楚。在此,我们采用一个综合评估模型(AIM/enduse、CAM-chem、IMED|HEL)来分析中国省一级在两度目标范围内的空气质量变化及其相应的健康和经济影响。我们的研究结果表明,管道末端技术、可再生能源利用和电气化的结合在改善空气质量方面产生了最有前景的结果,与参考情景相比,2050 年细颗粒物(PM2.5)减少了-34.6 μg m-3,臭氧减少了-18.3 ppb。相比之下,与管道末端情景相比,二氧化碳捕集与封存技术在空气质量(PM2.5 为-9.4 μg m-3,臭氧为-2.4 ppb)和累计过早死亡人数(从 2010 年到 2050 年为-340 万人)方面的改善相对较小。值得注意的是,河南、河北、山东和四川等人口密集地区的健康和经济效益最大。本研究旨在预测未来在改善空气质量和碳减排方面有效的减排技术和气候政策。此外,本研究还试图制定详细的省级空气污染控制策略,为政策制定者和利益相关者提供有价值的指导,以追求可持续的、具有健康意识的环境管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
6.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Ecotechnology (ESE) is an international, open-access journal publishing original research in environmental science, engineering, ecotechnology, and related fields. Authors publishing in ESE can immediately, permanently, and freely share their work. They have license options and retain copyright. Published by Elsevier, ESE is co-organized by the Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, and the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信