Quantifying the informal sand market and its consequences: The case of Brazil

IF 4.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Lidiane Santana Oliveira, Sérgio Cirelli Angulo, Vanderley M. John
{"title":"Quantifying the informal sand market and its consequences: The case of Brazil","authors":"Lidiane Santana Oliveira,&nbsp;Sérgio Cirelli Angulo,&nbsp;Vanderley M. John","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sand is a globally abundant resource and one of the most used minerals in construction. Local scarcity is becoming more common owing to the increasing demand in urban areas and stricter environmental regulations. In addition, the environmental impact caused by sand mining is worsened by clandestine extraction, which operates in a predatory manner. To reach the targets proposed by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, a country needs to combat the illegal extraction of sand, and this is only possible by knowing the local situation that needs to be changed. This study aims to estimate more accurately the total sand consumption that is being illegally extracted and is used by the Brazilian construction sector, its consequences, and ways to mitigate it. The method is applicable to any country with a similar problem. The results show that 76% of the extracted sand in Brazil is being mined illegally. The sum of unspent funds in environmental recovery, annual uncollected taxes, and annual unpaid social charges due to the activities of unregulated mining companies were equivalent to <span>USD</span> 774 million (0.05% of Brazil's GDP) in 2020. Strategies for concrete and mortar industrialization, and the substitution of natural sand by secondary materials could mitigate half of the illegal sand market that supplies sand for Brazilian construction, but it requires efforts of the entire construction sector, society, and government.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 101032"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464524000708","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sand is a globally abundant resource and one of the most used minerals in construction. Local scarcity is becoming more common owing to the increasing demand in urban areas and stricter environmental regulations. In addition, the environmental impact caused by sand mining is worsened by clandestine extraction, which operates in a predatory manner. To reach the targets proposed by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, a country needs to combat the illegal extraction of sand, and this is only possible by knowing the local situation that needs to be changed. This study aims to estimate more accurately the total sand consumption that is being illegally extracted and is used by the Brazilian construction sector, its consequences, and ways to mitigate it. The method is applicable to any country with a similar problem. The results show that 76% of the extracted sand in Brazil is being mined illegally. The sum of unspent funds in environmental recovery, annual uncollected taxes, and annual unpaid social charges due to the activities of unregulated mining companies were equivalent to USD 774 million (0.05% of Brazil's GDP) in 2020. Strategies for concrete and mortar industrialization, and the substitution of natural sand by secondary materials could mitigate half of the illegal sand market that supplies sand for Brazilian construction, but it requires efforts of the entire construction sector, society, and government.

量化非正规砂市场及其后果:巴西的案例
砂是全球丰富的资源,也是建筑中使用最多的矿物之一。由于城市地区的需求不断增加,加上环境法规更加严格,当地缺沙的现象越来越普遍。此外,以掠夺方式进行的秘密开采也加剧了采砂对环境的影响。为了实现联合国可持续发展目标提出的目标,一个国家需要打击非法采砂,而只有了解当地需要改变的情况,才能做到这一点。本研究旨在更准确地估算巴西建筑行业非法开采和使用的砂石消耗总量、其后果以及缓解方法。该方法适用于存在类似问题的任何国家。研究结果表明,巴西 76% 的砂石被非法开采。到 2020 年,由于不受监管的采矿公司的活动而造成的环境恢复未动用资金、每年未征收的税款和每年未支付的社会费用的总和相当于 7.74 亿美元(占巴西国内生产总值的 0.05%)。混凝土和砂浆工业化战略,以及用二次材料替代天然砂,可以减少为巴西建筑用砂供应的非法砂市场的一半,但这需要整个建筑部门、社会和政府的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Development
Environmental Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action. Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers. All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信