Assessment of Orthodontic Retention Protocols and their Effects on Treatment Stability

IF 0.8 Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Riddhi Chawla, Faisal Mohiuddin Ansari, Manjunath Chekka, M. Akhilesh, V. A. Deepak, P. K. Varma Datla, Preetham Ravuri
{"title":"Assessment of Orthodontic Retention Protocols and their Effects on Treatment Stability","authors":"Riddhi Chawla, Faisal Mohiuddin Ansari, Manjunath Chekka, M. Akhilesh, V. A. Deepak, P. K. Varma Datla, Preetham Ravuri","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_270_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Orthodontic retention protocols are crucial for maintaining treatment stability post-orthodontic treatment. However, the optimal retention strategy remains debated.\n \n \n \n A retrospective analysis of patient records from a tertiary orthodontic center over 5 years was conducted. Variables, including retention protocols employed, duration of retention, and treatment stability, were weighed.\n \n \n \n Fixed retainers were the most commonly utilized retention protocol, followed by removable retainers and combination methods. Although the incidence of treatment relapse appeared higher among patients with removable retainers, the difference did not reach statistical significance. Combination protocols demonstrated comparable treatment stability to fixed retainers.\n \n \n \n This research gives understanding of the effectiveness of orthodontic retention protocols in a tertiary center setting. While fixed retainers remain widely used, removable retainers and combination methods also show promise in maintaining treatment stability. Addressing patient compliance issues and optimizing retention strategies based on individual patient needs are essential for enhancing treatment outcomes.\n","PeriodicalId":16824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","volume":"45 36","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_270_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Orthodontic retention protocols are crucial for maintaining treatment stability post-orthodontic treatment. However, the optimal retention strategy remains debated. A retrospective analysis of patient records from a tertiary orthodontic center over 5 years was conducted. Variables, including retention protocols employed, duration of retention, and treatment stability, were weighed. Fixed retainers were the most commonly utilized retention protocol, followed by removable retainers and combination methods. Although the incidence of treatment relapse appeared higher among patients with removable retainers, the difference did not reach statistical significance. Combination protocols demonstrated comparable treatment stability to fixed retainers. This research gives understanding of the effectiveness of orthodontic retention protocols in a tertiary center setting. While fixed retainers remain widely used, removable retainers and combination methods also show promise in maintaining treatment stability. Addressing patient compliance issues and optimizing retention strategies based on individual patient needs are essential for enhancing treatment outcomes.
评估正畸保持方案及其对治疗稳定性的影响
摘要 正畸保持方案对于保持正畸治疗后的治疗稳定性至关重要。然而,最佳的保持策略仍存在争议。 我们对一家三级正畸中心 5 年来的患者记录进行了回顾性分析。权衡了各种变量,包括采用的保持方案、保持时间和治疗稳定性。 固定保持器是最常用的保持方法,其次是活动保持器和组合方法。虽然可摘保持器患者的治疗复发率较高,但两者之间的差异并未达到统计学意义上的显著性。组合方案的治疗稳定性与固定保持器相当。 这项研究让人们了解了在三级中心环境下正畸保持方案的有效性。虽然固定保持器仍被广泛使用,但可摘保持器和组合方法也显示出保持治疗稳定性的前景。解决患者的依从性问题并根据患者的个人需求优化保持策略对于提高治疗效果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is a Quarterly multidisciplinary open access biomedical journal. Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is an international medium of interaction between scientist, academicians and industrial personnel’s.JPBS is now offial publication of OPUBS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信