“Just got diagnosed; what worked for you?”: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Treatment Experiences in the Prolactinoma Subreddit

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Rose Dimitroyannis, David Fenton, Sharanya Thodupunoori, Stella Cho, Rachel Nordgren, Sean P. Polster, Peleg Horowitz, Paramita Das, Christopher R. Roxbury
{"title":"“Just got diagnosed; what worked for you?”: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Treatment Experiences in the Prolactinoma Subreddit","authors":"Rose Dimitroyannis, David Fenton, Sharanya Thodupunoori, Stella Cho, Rachel Nordgren, Sean P. Polster, Peleg Horowitz, Paramita Das, Christopher R. Roxbury","doi":"10.1055/a-2358-9228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nABSTRACT\n\nINTRODUCTION\nWith improvement in complication and remission rates, recent studies have suggested the viability of transsphenoidal surgery as first-line management for prolactinomas. Reddit, an online forum, allows posters to interact with one another, discuss symptoms, treatments, and disease courses through specialized forums known as “subreddits”. Given the lack of research comparing patient experience on pharmacotherapy versus surgery, we sought to assess the sentiment of treatment within the “r/Prolactinoma subreddit” community.\n\nMETHODS\nA search was done by filtering the r/Prolactinoma subreddit. Posts were sorted by “top” of “all time,” meaning entries with the most engagement throughout the site's history. Welch’s t-test was used to analyze treatment type, while sentiment regarding treatment was analyzed using grounded theory qualitative methods.\n\nRESULTS\nFrom 189 total entries, 82 were included; 33% (n=27/82) were posts. Of posters disclosing their treatment, 11% underwent surgery (n=9/79), while 76% received medication (n=60/79). The proportion of positive: negative sentiment and level of engagement on posts regarding pharmacotherapy vs surgical treatments were not significantly different (p>0.05). Qualitative analysis showed themes of changes after medical treatment, immediate changes post-surgery, and online community. \n\nCONCLUSION\nOur mixed-methods study found statistically non-significant differences in sentiment when comparing Reddit posts from patients who underwent medical and surgical management. Qualitative analysis revealed several themes regarding patients’ perceptions of medical and surgical management and the benefits of an online community. The qualitative themes brought to light by this study may serve to inform future studies examining the patient experience with prolactinoma care. \n","PeriodicalId":16513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2358-9228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION With improvement in complication and remission rates, recent studies have suggested the viability of transsphenoidal surgery as first-line management for prolactinomas. Reddit, an online forum, allows posters to interact with one another, discuss symptoms, treatments, and disease courses through specialized forums known as “subreddits”. Given the lack of research comparing patient experience on pharmacotherapy versus surgery, we sought to assess the sentiment of treatment within the “r/Prolactinoma subreddit” community. METHODS A search was done by filtering the r/Prolactinoma subreddit. Posts were sorted by “top” of “all time,” meaning entries with the most engagement throughout the site's history. Welch’s t-test was used to analyze treatment type, while sentiment regarding treatment was analyzed using grounded theory qualitative methods. RESULTS From 189 total entries, 82 were included; 33% (n=27/82) were posts. Of posters disclosing their treatment, 11% underwent surgery (n=9/79), while 76% received medication (n=60/79). The proportion of positive: negative sentiment and level of engagement on posts regarding pharmacotherapy vs surgical treatments were not significantly different (p>0.05). Qualitative analysis showed themes of changes after medical treatment, immediate changes post-surgery, and online community. CONCLUSION Our mixed-methods study found statistically non-significant differences in sentiment when comparing Reddit posts from patients who underwent medical and surgical management. Qualitative analysis revealed several themes regarding patients’ perceptions of medical and surgical management and the benefits of an online community. The qualitative themes brought to light by this study may serve to inform future studies examining the patient experience with prolactinoma care.
"刚确诊,什么对你有效?泌乳素瘤子论坛治疗经验的混合方法分析
ABSTRACTINTRODUCTION 随着并发症和缓解率的改善,最近的研究表明,经蝶窦手术作为催乳素瘤的一线治疗方法是可行的。Reddit是一个在线论坛,允许发帖者通过被称为 "subreddits "的专门论坛相互交流、讨论症状、治疗方法和疾病进程。鉴于缺乏比较患者药物治疗与手术治疗经验的研究,我们试图评估 "r/Prolactinoma subreddit "社区中的治疗情绪。帖子按 "所有时间 "中的 "顶部 "排序,即网站历史上参与度最高的条目。韦尔奇 t 检验用于分析治疗类型,而有关治疗的情感则采用基础理论定性方法进行分析。结果在总共 189 个条目中,有 82 个被纳入;33%(n=27/82)是帖子。在披露治疗方法的发帖人中,11%的人接受了手术(n=9/79),76%的人接受了药物治疗(n=60/79)。关于药物治疗与手术治疗的帖子中,积极与消极情绪的比例和参与程度没有明显差异(P>0.05)。定性分析显示,主题包括药物治疗后的变化、手术后的直接变化和在线社区。结论我们的混合方法研究发现,在比较接受药物治疗和手术治疗的患者在 Reddit 上发表的帖子时,情感差异在统计学上并不显著。定性分析揭示了几个主题,涉及患者对内外科治疗的看法以及在线社区的益处。本研究揭示的定性主题可为今后研究催乳素瘤患者护理体验提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
516
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base (JNLS B) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS B currently serves as the official organ of several national and international neurosurgery and skull base societies. JNLS B is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS B includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS B is devoted to the techniques and procedures of skull base surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信