Internationalization of higher education institutions: a comparative study in Taiwan and Japan

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
R. Chen, Sophia Shi-Huei Ho, Futao Huang, Ying‐Yan Lu
{"title":"Internationalization of higher education institutions: a comparative study in Taiwan and Japan","authors":"R. Chen, Sophia Shi-Huei Ho, Futao Huang, Ying‐Yan Lu","doi":"10.1108/ijced-06-2023-0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe internationalization of higher education institutions (HEIs) is the top stage of international relations among universities, and it is no longer regarded as a goal but as a means to improve the education of sustainability. As institutional commitments to internationalize higher education continue to grow, so does the need to critically consider the intended purposes and actual outcomes of the resulting programs and policies. This study aims to explore how institutional international policies influence outcomes of HEIs internationalization in the East Asian region, specifically in Taiwan and Japan.Design/methodology/approachThe study used quantitative design. 3,158 participants, including 1,192 participants from Taiwan and 1,966 participants from Japan, were randomly recruited to complete the Academic Profession in the Knowledge Society (APIKS), an international survey examining the change in academic work in HEIs. The study adopted quantitative data and used two variables (institutional international policies and outcomes of internationalization) with descriptive, correlational, and moderated multiple hierarchical regression analysis with SPSS computer software to answer the research questions.FindingsThe study showed that both Taiwanese and Japanese academics have high agreements on the outcomes of internationalization for enhancing academic quality and increasing mobility of students. In both countries, two institutional international policies of HEIs internalization-- clear internationalization strategies and funding for faculty members to undertake research abroad-- can significantly influence the process of internationalization in the teaching-oriented and research-oriented HEIs respectively.Originality/valueThis study provides insight into the relationship between institutional international policies and the outcomes of HEIs internationalization in Taiwan and Japan. It provides university leaders with empirical evidence for implementing managerial strategies of internationalization that promote education for sustainability in HEIs.","PeriodicalId":51967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijced-06-2023-0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe internationalization of higher education institutions (HEIs) is the top stage of international relations among universities, and it is no longer regarded as a goal but as a means to improve the education of sustainability. As institutional commitments to internationalize higher education continue to grow, so does the need to critically consider the intended purposes and actual outcomes of the resulting programs and policies. This study aims to explore how institutional international policies influence outcomes of HEIs internationalization in the East Asian region, specifically in Taiwan and Japan.Design/methodology/approachThe study used quantitative design. 3,158 participants, including 1,192 participants from Taiwan and 1,966 participants from Japan, were randomly recruited to complete the Academic Profession in the Knowledge Society (APIKS), an international survey examining the change in academic work in HEIs. The study adopted quantitative data and used two variables (institutional international policies and outcomes of internationalization) with descriptive, correlational, and moderated multiple hierarchical regression analysis with SPSS computer software to answer the research questions.FindingsThe study showed that both Taiwanese and Japanese academics have high agreements on the outcomes of internationalization for enhancing academic quality and increasing mobility of students. In both countries, two institutional international policies of HEIs internalization-- clear internationalization strategies and funding for faculty members to undertake research abroad-- can significantly influence the process of internationalization in the teaching-oriented and research-oriented HEIs respectively.Originality/valueThis study provides insight into the relationship between institutional international policies and the outcomes of HEIs internationalization in Taiwan and Japan. It provides university leaders with empirical evidence for implementing managerial strategies of internationalization that promote education for sustainability in HEIs.
高等教育机构的国际化:台湾和日本的比较研究
目的高等教育机构(HEIs)的国际化是大学之间国际关系的最高阶段,它不再被视为一个目标,而是改善可持续发展教育的一种手段。随着机构对高等教育国际化的承诺不断增加,我们也有必要批判性地考虑由此产生的计划和政策的预期目的和实际结果。本研究旨在探讨东亚地区(尤其是台湾和日本)的院校国际化政策如何影响高校国际化的成果。本研究采用定量设计,随机招募了 3,158 名参与者,包括来自台湾的 1,192 名参与者和来自日本的 1,966 名参与者,他们完成了 "知识社会中的学术职业"(APIKS)调查,这是一项研究高等院校学术工作变化的国际调查。研究采用定量数据,并使用 SPSS 计算机软件对两个变量(院校国际化政策和国际化成果)进行描述性分析、相关分析和调节多元层次回归分析,以回答研究问题。在这两个国家,高等院校内部化的两项制度性国际政策--明确的国际化战略和资助教师在国外从事研究--能够分别显著影响教学型和研究型高等院校的国际化进程。它为大学领导者提供了实施国际化管理战略的经验证据,从而促进高校的可持续发展教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信