{"title":"Reception History and the Historiography of Economics","authors":"Paul Oslington","doi":"10.1080/10370196.2024.2362008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This paper explores reception history as a framework for historians of economics in the light of the impasse between contextual and traditional historiography. It focuses on the particular reception history approach of the German literary critic Hans Robert Jauss, which is grounded in the philosophical hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Jauss’ reception approach is outlined then compared to the contextual historiography of Quentin Skinner, and Donald Winch, as well as to traditional historiography of economics exemplified by Joseph Schumpeter, George Stigler, Paul Samuelson and Mark Blaug. I argue that Jauss’ reception history framework encompasses the contextual and traditional approaches, picking up the attention to original readers that is the strength of the contextual approach, while also validating attention to contemporary economist readers. It provides tools for more self-consciousness attention to the multiple contexts involved in the study of past economic texts. It thus offers a way forward in the historiographical impasse facing contemporary historians of economics.","PeriodicalId":143586,"journal":{"name":"History of Economics Review","volume":"227 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10370196.2024.2362008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
: This paper explores reception history as a framework for historians of economics in the light of the impasse between contextual and traditional historiography. It focuses on the particular reception history approach of the German literary critic Hans Robert Jauss, which is grounded in the philosophical hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Jauss’ reception approach is outlined then compared to the contextual historiography of Quentin Skinner, and Donald Winch, as well as to traditional historiography of economics exemplified by Joseph Schumpeter, George Stigler, Paul Samuelson and Mark Blaug. I argue that Jauss’ reception history framework encompasses the contextual and traditional approaches, picking up the attention to original readers that is the strength of the contextual approach, while also validating attention to contemporary economist readers. It provides tools for more self-consciousness attention to the multiple contexts involved in the study of past economic texts. It thus offers a way forward in the historiographical impasse facing contemporary historians of economics.
:鉴于语境史学与传统史学之间的僵局,本文探讨了作为经济史学家框架的接受史。论文重点探讨了德国文学评论家汉斯-罗伯特-尧斯(Hans Robert Jauss)以汉斯-格奥尔格-伽达默尔(Hans-Georg Gadamer)的哲学诠释学为基础的特殊接受史方法。首先概述了尧斯的接受史方法,然后将其与昆廷-斯金纳和唐纳德-温奇的语境史学以及约瑟夫-熊彼特、乔治-斯蒂格勒、保罗-萨缪尔森和马克-布劳格的传统经济史学进行比较。我认为,乔斯的接受史框架涵盖了语境方法和传统方法,拾起了语境方法的优势--对原始读者的关注,同时也验证了对当代经济学家读者的关注。它为更自觉地关注过去经济学文本研究中涉及的多重语境提供了工具。因此,它为当代经济史学家所面临的史学僵局提供了一条出路。