Pharmaceutical care for patients with headaches: pharmacists' statements and pharmacy practice

O. V. Reshetko, A. I. Grishin
{"title":"Pharmaceutical care for patients with headaches: pharmacists' statements and pharmacy practice","authors":"O. V. Reshetko, A. I. Grishin","doi":"10.37489/2588-0519-2024-2-104-115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. According to the World Health Organization, headaches are one of the most common symptoms of nervous system diseases. Pharmacists play an important role in communicating with headache patients, as well as in rationally directing self-treatment.Aim. Using the questionnaire and patient’s simulation method, comparing the results of these studies, to evaluate the quality of pharmaceutical care for patients with headaches.Material and methods. An anonymous survey was conducted among 153 pharmacists. Three different trained simulated patients (SP) allegedly suffering from headaches visited 101 pharmacies. The results were recorded visually and on a voice recorder. The commercial segment of the Russian pharmaceutical market for analgesics was analyzed.Results. The leaders in sales in ATC-subgroups were the following INN: Ibuprofen, Paracetamol+Naproxen+Caffeine+Drotaverine+ Pheniramine. Corresponding trade names are most often recommended based on the results of questionnaires and simulated patient methodology (SPM). Prescription drugs (13.1 %/14.9 % in SPM) that shouldn’t be recommended in the pharmacy and combination drugs (87.6 %/91.1 % in SPM) were frequently mentioned. A similar number of INN (20/23) and trade names (52/53) were named. The average number of trade names recommended by one pharmacist was higher in the SPM. In SPM the patient was asked very few questions and almost no information about the drug was specified.Conclusion. The real involvement of pharmacists in the provision of pharmaceutical care to patients with cephalgia appears to be much lower, in contrast to the stated results of the questionnaire. In real pharmacy practice, the approach to interaction with a patient with headache and counselling is formal and requires standardization: the development of protocols, standards and algorithms for interaction with patients with headache based on clinical guidelines.","PeriodicalId":326764,"journal":{"name":"Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0519-2024-2-104-115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance. According to the World Health Organization, headaches are one of the most common symptoms of nervous system diseases. Pharmacists play an important role in communicating with headache patients, as well as in rationally directing self-treatment.Aim. Using the questionnaire and patient’s simulation method, comparing the results of these studies, to evaluate the quality of pharmaceutical care for patients with headaches.Material and methods. An anonymous survey was conducted among 153 pharmacists. Three different trained simulated patients (SP) allegedly suffering from headaches visited 101 pharmacies. The results were recorded visually and on a voice recorder. The commercial segment of the Russian pharmaceutical market for analgesics was analyzed.Results. The leaders in sales in ATC-subgroups were the following INN: Ibuprofen, Paracetamol+Naproxen+Caffeine+Drotaverine+ Pheniramine. Corresponding trade names are most often recommended based on the results of questionnaires and simulated patient methodology (SPM). Prescription drugs (13.1 %/14.9 % in SPM) that shouldn’t be recommended in the pharmacy and combination drugs (87.6 %/91.1 % in SPM) were frequently mentioned. A similar number of INN (20/23) and trade names (52/53) were named. The average number of trade names recommended by one pharmacist was higher in the SPM. In SPM the patient was asked very few questions and almost no information about the drug was specified.Conclusion. The real involvement of pharmacists in the provision of pharmaceutical care to patients with cephalgia appears to be much lower, in contrast to the stated results of the questionnaire. In real pharmacy practice, the approach to interaction with a patient with headache and counselling is formal and requires standardization: the development of protocols, standards and algorithms for interaction with patients with headache based on clinical guidelines.
头痛患者的药学护理:药剂师的声明和药学实践
相关性。世界卫生组织指出,头痛是神经系统疾病最常见的症状之一。药剂师在与头痛患者沟通以及合理指导自我治疗方面发挥着重要作用。采用问卷调查法和患者模拟法,比较这些研究的结果,评估头痛患者的药物治疗质量。对 153 名药剂师进行了匿名调查。三名不同的训练有素的模拟患者(SP)声称患有头痛,他们访问了 101 家药房。调查结果通过视觉和录音机记录下来。对俄罗斯镇痛药市场的商业部分进行了分析。在 ATC 分组中,销售量最大的是以下 INN:布洛芬、扑热息痛 + 萘普生 + 咖啡因 + 屈他维林 + 非尼拉敏。根据问卷调查和模拟病人方法(SPM)的结果,相应的商品名最常被推荐使用。经常提到的是不应在药房推荐的处方药(SPM 为 13.1%/14.9%)和复方药(SPM 为 87.6%/91.1%)。国际非专利商标名(20/23)和商品名(52/53)的数量相近。在 SPM 中,一名药剂师推荐的商品名的平均数量较高。在 SPM 中,病人被问到的问题很少,几乎没有具体说明药物的信息。与问卷调查的结果相比,药剂师在为头痛患者提供药物治疗方面的实际参与度似乎要低得多。在实际的药学实践中,与头痛患者进行互动和咨询的方法是正式的,需要标准化:根据临床指南制定与头痛患者互动的协议、标准和算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信