A prospective observational study to compare and evaluate delta down, aortic velocity time integral variability, and superior vena cava collapsibility index as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with supratentorial brain tumors undergoing elective neurosurgery

Q3 Medicine
Neeraja Ajayan, A. Hrishi, M. Sethuraman, Unnikrishnan Prathpadas, R. Praveen, G. Divakar
{"title":"A prospective observational study to compare and evaluate delta down, aortic velocity time integral variability, and superior vena cava collapsibility index as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with supratentorial brain tumors undergoing elective neurosurgery","authors":"Neeraja Ajayan, A. Hrishi, M. Sethuraman, Unnikrishnan Prathpadas, R. Praveen, G. Divakar","doi":"10.25259/sni_335_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nPatients undergoing surgical resection of brain tumors frequently exhibit a spectrum of hemodynamic fluctuations necessitating careful fluid management. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness, such as delta down (DD), aortic velocity time integral variability (VTIAoV), and superior vena cava collapsibility index (SVCCI), in patients undergoing neurosurgery for brain tumors.\n\n\n\nIn this prospective study, 30 patients scheduled to undergo elective neurosurgery for brain tumor resection were enrolled. Baseline measurements of vitals, anesthetic parameters, and study variables were recorded post-induction. Subsequently, patients received a fluid bolus of 10 mL/kg of colloid over 20 min, and measurements were repeated post-loading. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. The normally distributed continuous variables were compared using Student’s t-test, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The predictive capability of variables for fluid responsiveness was assessed using Pearson’s coefficient analysis (r).\n\n\n\nOf the 30 patients, 22 were identified as volume responders (R), while eight were non-responders (NR). DD >5 mmHg effectively distinguished between R and NR (P < 0.001), with a good predictive ability (r = 0.759). SVCCI >38% differentiated R from NR (P < 0.001), with excellent predictability (r = 0.994). Similarly, VTIAoV >20% was also a good predictor (P < 0.05; r = 0.746).\n\n\n\nOur study revealed that most patients undergoing surgical resection of brain tumors exhibited fluid responsiveness. Among the variables assessed, SVCCI >38% emerged as an excellent predictor, followed by VTIAoV >20% and DD >5 mm Hg, for evaluating fluid status in this population.\n","PeriodicalId":38981,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Neurology International","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_335_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients undergoing surgical resection of brain tumors frequently exhibit a spectrum of hemodynamic fluctuations necessitating careful fluid management. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness, such as delta down (DD), aortic velocity time integral variability (VTIAoV), and superior vena cava collapsibility index (SVCCI), in patients undergoing neurosurgery for brain tumors. In this prospective study, 30 patients scheduled to undergo elective neurosurgery for brain tumor resection were enrolled. Baseline measurements of vitals, anesthetic parameters, and study variables were recorded post-induction. Subsequently, patients received a fluid bolus of 10 mL/kg of colloid over 20 min, and measurements were repeated post-loading. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. The normally distributed continuous variables were compared using Student’s t-test, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The predictive capability of variables for fluid responsiveness was assessed using Pearson’s coefficient analysis (r). Of the 30 patients, 22 were identified as volume responders (R), while eight were non-responders (NR). DD >5 mmHg effectively distinguished between R and NR (P < 0.001), with a good predictive ability (r = 0.759). SVCCI >38% differentiated R from NR (P < 0.001), with excellent predictability (r = 0.994). Similarly, VTIAoV >20% was also a good predictor (P < 0.05; r = 0.746). Our study revealed that most patients undergoing surgical resection of brain tumors exhibited fluid responsiveness. Among the variables assessed, SVCCI >38% emerged as an excellent predictor, followed by VTIAoV >20% and DD >5 mm Hg, for evaluating fluid status in this population.
前瞻性观察研究:比较和评估德尔塔下降、主动脉速度时间积分变异性和上腔静脉塌陷指数,作为接受择期神经外科手术的幕上脑肿瘤患者对液体反应性的预测指标
接受脑肿瘤手术切除的患者经常会出现一系列血流动力学波动,因此需要进行谨慎的输液管理。本研究旨在评估脑肿瘤神经外科手术患者输液反应性动态预测指标的可行性,这些指标包括δ下降(DD)、主动脉速度时间积分变异性(VTIAoV)和上腔静脉塌陷指数(SVCCI)。诱导后记录了生命体征、麻醉参数和研究变量的基线测量值。随后,患者在 20 分钟内接受每公斤 10 毫升胶体的液体栓塞,并在加载后重复测量。数据以平均值 ± 标准差表示。正态分布的连续变量采用学生 t 检验进行比较,P < 0.05 具有统计学意义。使用皮尔逊系数分析(r)评估变量对输液反应性的预测能力。在 30 名患者中,22 人被确定为容量反应者(R),8 人为无反应者(NR)。DD >5 mmHg 能有效区分 R 和 NR(P < 0.001),具有良好的预测能力(r = 0.759)。SVCCI >38%可区分R和NR(P < 0.001),预测能力极佳(r = 0.994)。同样,VTIAoV >20% 也是一个很好的预测指标(P < 0.05;r = 0.746)。在评估的变量中,SVCCI >38% 是一个很好的预测因子,其次是 VTIAoV >20% 和 DD >5 mm Hg,可用于评估该人群的液体状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信