Oscar Wilde’s Moral Philosophy: A Synthesis between Aestheticism and The Picture of Dorian Gray

Q1 Arts and Humanities
L. Akudolu, I. K. Okwuosa, I. Okeke, C. N. Okolie, Francis C. Ofoegbu, Valentine N. Ojiegb, Christopher O. Akpa, K. C. Solomon, H. O. Eze, Chinwe Jane Okolo
{"title":"Oscar Wilde’s Moral Philosophy: A Synthesis between Aestheticism and The Picture of Dorian Gray","authors":"L. Akudolu, I. K. Okwuosa, I. Okeke, C. N. Okolie, Francis C. Ofoegbu, Valentine N. Ojiegb, Christopher O. Akpa, K. C. Solomon, H. O. Eze, Chinwe Jane Okolo","doi":"10.15294/harmonia.v24i1.39377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The exaggeration of Oscar Wilde’s aestheticism that the work of art is purely for beauty and pleasure and has nothing to do with morality makes it very difficult for his moral philosophy to be conceived. Even his novel, The Picture of Dorian Gray, which is meant to balance his exaggeration of pleasure in his aestheticism, is often misinterpreted as an aesthetic eulogy. At the same time, some see it as a pure contradiction to his former philosophic position. This paper, therefore, attempts to identify his moral philosophy through a dialectic study of his aestheticism and The Picture of Dorian Gray. As it is qualitative research, the authors source their data primarily from literary works by Oscar Wilde, while other library materials serve as secondary sources. Various philosophical tools, especially dialectics and hermeneutics, are applied in data interpretation. The finding is that contrary to the expectation and assumption of many scholars, ethical hedonism rather than aesthetic hedonism is his moral philosophy.","PeriodicalId":36152,"journal":{"name":"Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education","volume":"99 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/harmonia.v24i1.39377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The exaggeration of Oscar Wilde’s aestheticism that the work of art is purely for beauty and pleasure and has nothing to do with morality makes it very difficult for his moral philosophy to be conceived. Even his novel, The Picture of Dorian Gray, which is meant to balance his exaggeration of pleasure in his aestheticism, is often misinterpreted as an aesthetic eulogy. At the same time, some see it as a pure contradiction to his former philosophic position. This paper, therefore, attempts to identify his moral philosophy through a dialectic study of his aestheticism and The Picture of Dorian Gray. As it is qualitative research, the authors source their data primarily from literary works by Oscar Wilde, while other library materials serve as secondary sources. Various philosophical tools, especially dialectics and hermeneutics, are applied in data interpretation. The finding is that contrary to the expectation and assumption of many scholars, ethical hedonism rather than aesthetic hedonism is his moral philosophy.
奥斯卡-王尔德的道德哲学:唯美主义与《道林-格雷的画像》之间的综合体
奥斯卡-王尔德的唯美主义夸张地认为,艺术作品纯粹是为了美和享乐,与道德无关,这使得他的道德哲学很难被人理解。即使是他的小说《多伦-格雷的画像》,这部旨在平衡他的唯美主义中对快乐的夸大的小说,也常常被误解为美学讴歌。同时,也有人认为这纯粹是与他之前的哲学立场相矛盾。因此,本文试图通过对他的唯美主义和《道林-格雷的画像》的辩证研究来确定他的道德哲学。由于是定性研究,作者主要从奥斯卡-王尔德的文学作品中获取数据,其他图书馆资料则作为第二手资料。在解释数据时运用了各种哲学工具,特别是辩证法和诠释学。研究结果表明,与许多学者的预期和假设相反,伦理享乐主义而非审美享乐主义才是王尔德的道德哲学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education
Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信