A - 38 Examining Persisting State Anxiety and Concussion Clinical Outcomes across Concussion Recovery

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
K. Durfee, S. Jennings, M. Womble, S. Amalfe, R. Elbin
{"title":"A - 38 Examining Persisting State Anxiety and Concussion Clinical Outcomes across Concussion Recovery","authors":"K. Durfee, S. Jennings, M. Womble, S. Amalfe, R. Elbin","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae052.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Document changes in state anxiety over the course of recovery from concussion and examine the effect of persisting state anxiety on concussion clinical outcomes.\n \n \n \n Patients (ages 15–51 yrs) seeking care for a sport or non-sport-related concussion within 1–7 days post-injury were included in this study. Participants completed a self-report measure of state anxiety (STAI) at each clinical visit. Differences in STAI scores from visit 1 and visit 2 were calculated and used to categorize patients into a PERSIST (scores stayed the same or got worse) and an IMPROVE group (scores improved). Changes in STAI scores across two clinical visits were examined with a paired samples t-test, and a series of independent samples t-tests and chi-square analyses were used to examine between-group differences in clinical outcomes (symptom score, neurocognitive scores, vestibular/ocular motor symptoms and impairment, and recovery time).\n \n \n \n 187 participants (M = 22.37, SD = 10.67 yrs, 65% female) completed study measures at 4.25 (SD = 1.68) (visit 1) and 13.20 (SD = 28.65) (visit 2) post-injury. STAI scores significantly differed between first (M = 20.99, SD = 6.05) and second visit (M = 17.41, SD = 6.21, p < 0.001). The PERSIST group (n = 41, M = 25.90, SD = 20.03) had significantly higher total symptom scores at visit 2 compared to those in the IMPROVE group (n = 122, M = 16.23, SD = 16.17, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in other clinical outcomes between those with and without persisting state anxiety.\n \n \n \n State anxiety changes throughout concussion recovery and individuals with persisting state anxiety exhibit higher symptom scores at visit 2. Assessment, reassurance and recognition of anxiety is important for overall symptom recovery.\n","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.38","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Document changes in state anxiety over the course of recovery from concussion and examine the effect of persisting state anxiety on concussion clinical outcomes. Patients (ages 15–51 yrs) seeking care for a sport or non-sport-related concussion within 1–7 days post-injury were included in this study. Participants completed a self-report measure of state anxiety (STAI) at each clinical visit. Differences in STAI scores from visit 1 and visit 2 were calculated and used to categorize patients into a PERSIST (scores stayed the same or got worse) and an IMPROVE group (scores improved). Changes in STAI scores across two clinical visits were examined with a paired samples t-test, and a series of independent samples t-tests and chi-square analyses were used to examine between-group differences in clinical outcomes (symptom score, neurocognitive scores, vestibular/ocular motor symptoms and impairment, and recovery time). 187 participants (M = 22.37, SD = 10.67 yrs, 65% female) completed study measures at 4.25 (SD = 1.68) (visit 1) and 13.20 (SD = 28.65) (visit 2) post-injury. STAI scores significantly differed between first (M = 20.99, SD = 6.05) and second visit (M = 17.41, SD = 6.21, p < 0.001). The PERSIST group (n = 41, M = 25.90, SD = 20.03) had significantly higher total symptom scores at visit 2 compared to those in the IMPROVE group (n = 122, M = 16.23, SD = 16.17, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in other clinical outcomes between those with and without persisting state anxiety. State anxiety changes throughout concussion recovery and individuals with persisting state anxiety exhibit higher symptom scores at visit 2. Assessment, reassurance and recognition of anxiety is important for overall symptom recovery.
A - 38 研究持续状态焦虑与脑震荡恢复期的临床结果
记录脑震荡恢复过程中状态焦虑的变化,并研究持续状态焦虑对脑震荡临床结果的影响。 本研究纳入了因运动或非运动相关脑震荡而在受伤后 1-7 天内就诊的患者(15-51 岁)。参与者在每次就诊时都填写了一份自我报告的状态焦虑测量(STAI)。计算第 1 次就诊和第 2 次就诊时 STAI 分数的差异,并将患者分为 PERSIST 组(分数保持不变或恶化)和 IMPROVE 组(分数有所改善)。采用配对样本 t 检验法检验两次就诊时 STAI 评分的变化,并采用一系列独立样本 t 检验法和卡方分析法检验临床结果(症状评分、神经认知评分、前庭/眼球运动症状和损伤以及恢复时间)的组间差异。 187 名参与者(男 = 22.37 岁,女 SD = 10.67 岁,65% 为女性)分别在伤后 4.25(SD = 1.68)(第 1 次就诊)和 13.20(SD = 28.65)(第 2 次就诊)完成了研究测量。STAI 评分在第一次就诊(M = 20.99,SD = 6.05)和第二次就诊(M = 17.41,SD = 6.21,P < 0.001)之间存在明显差异。与 IMPROVE 组(n = 122,M = 16.23,SD = 16.17,p = 0.002)相比,PERSIST 组(n = 41,M = 25.90,SD = 20.03)在第二次就诊时的症状总分明显更高。有持续状态焦虑和没有持续状态焦虑的患者在其他临床结果上没有明显差异。 状态焦虑会在整个脑震荡恢复过程中发生变化,持续状态焦虑的患者在第二次就诊时会表现出更高的症状评分。对焦虑进行评估、安抚和识别对于整体症状的恢复非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信