Regional investment potential as a factor in achieving technological sovereignty in key sectors of the Russian economy

D. Y. Desyatnichenko, L. G. Karanatova, V. N. Moskalenko
{"title":"Regional investment potential as a factor in achieving technological sovereignty in key sectors of the Russian economy","authors":"D. Y. Desyatnichenko, L. G. Karanatova, V. N. Moskalenko","doi":"10.35854/1998-1627-2024-5-528-539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To develop a model of interrelation of factors and tools for increasing the region’s investment potential, aimed at accelerating the processes of achieving technological sovereignty in key sectors of the Russian economy by increasing the efficiency of regional investment policy on its basis.Objectives. To study the main approaches to understanding the essence and role of technological sovereignty; to group the key factors and tools for managing the region’s investment potential, to give their generalizing characteristic; to develop an algorithmic model of the relationship between factors and tools for increasing the region’s investment potential; to identify the main discussion aspects in understanding the essence and objectives of managing the level of investment potential of the region and technological sovereignty of the national economy.Methods. The principles and approaches of general scientific methods of scientific cognition: historical, logical, comparison, dialectical, system approach, structural-functional analysis, qualitative analysis and synthesis served as the methodological basis of the research.Results. Purposeful management of factors of the region’s investment potential allows to use its objective and potential advantages as an object of investment investments more effectively. In this regard, it seems reasonable to use a complex algorithmic model of interrelation of factors and tools to increase the investment potential of the region. The model proposed by the authors includes three groups of factors and related tools for the analysis of investment potential, as well as a block of generalizing tools for its comprehensive development. Technological sovereignty in modern conditions to a greater extent acquires the role of an effective protective mechanism of national identity and subjectivity for the states facing the problems generated by the external environment. The task of ensuring technological sovereignty today is a rational response to the rapidly changing world order, in which opportunities for free trade and international cooperation are no longer guaranteed in equal proportions to the countries concerned, which becomes a significant factor in their global vulnerability; it is an opportunity for more active development of national scientific and production potential, which will contribute to a relative equalization of the existing imbalances in the levels of technological development with the international community; is the first priority need to take into account long-term systemic effects, rather than current economic benefits, when making decisions on the conscious rejection or priority development of certain competencies, technological niches, types of production at the national and regional levels.Conclusions. High dynamism due to fierce competition in the technological sphere requires from federal and regional government bodies systematic systematic work aimed at ensuring a high level of investment attractiveness of key sectors and segments of the economy. Strengthening the role and attention to the issues of investment policy management due to the achieved level of investment potential both at the level of individual regions and industries, and the country as a whole, is now associated not only with current economic interests, but also with the strategic priorities of national identity and preservation of statehood. At the national level, it is necessary to form and regularly adjust the list of critical products and technologies, key industries that require continuous development while maintaining a leading rate of investment in research and development in order to create demanded and competitive products and services on their basis.","PeriodicalId":513263,"journal":{"name":"Economics and Management","volume":"105 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2024-5-528-539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To develop a model of interrelation of factors and tools for increasing the region’s investment potential, aimed at accelerating the processes of achieving technological sovereignty in key sectors of the Russian economy by increasing the efficiency of regional investment policy on its basis.Objectives. To study the main approaches to understanding the essence and role of technological sovereignty; to group the key factors and tools for managing the region’s investment potential, to give their generalizing characteristic; to develop an algorithmic model of the relationship between factors and tools for increasing the region’s investment potential; to identify the main discussion aspects in understanding the essence and objectives of managing the level of investment potential of the region and technological sovereignty of the national economy.Methods. The principles and approaches of general scientific methods of scientific cognition: historical, logical, comparison, dialectical, system approach, structural-functional analysis, qualitative analysis and synthesis served as the methodological basis of the research.Results. Purposeful management of factors of the region’s investment potential allows to use its objective and potential advantages as an object of investment investments more effectively. In this regard, it seems reasonable to use a complex algorithmic model of interrelation of factors and tools to increase the investment potential of the region. The model proposed by the authors includes three groups of factors and related tools for the analysis of investment potential, as well as a block of generalizing tools for its comprehensive development. Technological sovereignty in modern conditions to a greater extent acquires the role of an effective protective mechanism of national identity and subjectivity for the states facing the problems generated by the external environment. The task of ensuring technological sovereignty today is a rational response to the rapidly changing world order, in which opportunities for free trade and international cooperation are no longer guaranteed in equal proportions to the countries concerned, which becomes a significant factor in their global vulnerability; it is an opportunity for more active development of national scientific and production potential, which will contribute to a relative equalization of the existing imbalances in the levels of technological development with the international community; is the first priority need to take into account long-term systemic effects, rather than current economic benefits, when making decisions on the conscious rejection or priority development of certain competencies, technological niches, types of production at the national and regional levels.Conclusions. High dynamism due to fierce competition in the technological sphere requires from federal and regional government bodies systematic systematic work aimed at ensuring a high level of investment attractiveness of key sectors and segments of the economy. Strengthening the role and attention to the issues of investment policy management due to the achieved level of investment potential both at the level of individual regions and industries, and the country as a whole, is now associated not only with current economic interests, but also with the strategic priorities of national identity and preservation of statehood. At the national level, it is necessary to form and regularly adjust the list of critical products and technologies, key industries that require continuous development while maintaining a leading rate of investment in research and development in order to create demanded and competitive products and services on their basis.
地区投资潜力是俄罗斯经济关键领域实现技术主权的一个因素
目的建立提高地区投资潜力的因素和工具的相互关系模型,旨在通过提高地区投资政策的效率,加快俄罗斯经济关键部门实现技术主权的进程。研究理解技术主权的本质和作用的主要方法;对管理地区投资潜力的关键因素和工具进行归类,并给出其概括性特征;建立增加地区投资潜力的因素和工具之间关系的算法模型;确定在理解管理地区投资潜力水平和国民经济技术主权的本质和目标方面的主要讨论内容。科学认识的一般科学方法:历史、逻辑、比较、辩证、系统方法、结构功能分析、定性分析和综合的原则和方法是研究的方法论基础。对地区投资潜力因素进行有目的的管理可以更有效地利用其作为投资对象的客观和潜在优势。在这方面,使用各种因素和工具之间相互关系的复杂算法模型来提高该地区的投资潜力似乎是合理的。作者提出的模型包括用于分析投资潜力的三组因素和相关工具,以及用于全面开发投资潜力的一整套通用工具。在现代条件下,技术主权在更大程度上为面临外部环境问题的国家提供了一种有效的民族特性和主体性保护机制。今天,确保技术主权的任务是对迅速变化的世界秩序的合理回应,在这种世界秩序中,有关国家的自由贸易和国际合作机会不再得到等比例的保障,这成为它们在全球的脆弱性的一个重要因素;这是一个更加积极地开发国家科学和生产潜力的机会,这将有助于相对平衡与国 际社会在技术发展水平上的现有不平衡;在国家和地区层面做出有意识地拒绝或 优先发展某些能力、技术优势和生产类型的决定时,首先需要考虑的是长期的系 统效应,而不是当前的经济利益。结论。技术领域的激烈竞争所带来的高活力要求联邦和地区政府机构开展系统性的工作,以确 保主要经济部门和环节具有高水平的投资吸引力。由于个别地区和行业以及整个国家的投资潜力达到了一定水平,因此加强投资政策管理的作用和对这些问题的关注不仅与当前的经济利益相关,而且与民族认同和维护国家地位的战略重点相关。在国家层面,有必要制定并定期调整需要持续发展的关键产品和技术、重点产业清单,同时保持领先的研发投资率,以便在此基础上创造出有需求、有竞争力的产品和服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信