Exploring the Impact of Personal and Social Media-Based Factors on Judgments of Perceived Skepticism of COVID-19

COVID Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.3390/covid4070071
N. Vu, Brian Manata, Andrew High
{"title":"Exploring the Impact of Personal and Social Media-Based Factors on Judgments of Perceived Skepticism of COVID-19","authors":"N. Vu, Brian Manata, Andrew High","doi":"10.3390/covid4070071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Skepticism of COVID-19 has consequences for public health. We examined several variables that we reasoned were related to skepticism, including demographic factors, people’s perceptions and experiences related to COVID-19, and social media usage. The sample consisted of 294 participants recruited in April of 2020. Participants filled out a survey that included questions related to demographics, social media use, COVID-19 anxiety, COVID-19 interference, and COVID-19 skepticism. In the main, biological sex, ethnicity, and social media use were not significantly associated with skepticism regarding COVID-19. Alternatively, older participants and those who experienced greater anxiety related to the pandemic were less skeptical of COVID-19. Interestingly, people who experienced more interference in their lives because of COVID-19 were more skeptical of the pandemic. Finally, social media use moderated the influence of anxiety and interference on skepticism. The negative effect of anxiety on skepticism became weaker as people’s use of social media increased. The positive effect of interference related to COVID-19 on skepticism became stronger as people used more social media. Our findings underscore the importance of personal beliefs, attitudes, and experiences when explaining skepticism of the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":72714,"journal":{"name":"COVID","volume":"86 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COVID","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/covid4070071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Skepticism of COVID-19 has consequences for public health. We examined several variables that we reasoned were related to skepticism, including demographic factors, people’s perceptions and experiences related to COVID-19, and social media usage. The sample consisted of 294 participants recruited in April of 2020. Participants filled out a survey that included questions related to demographics, social media use, COVID-19 anxiety, COVID-19 interference, and COVID-19 skepticism. In the main, biological sex, ethnicity, and social media use were not significantly associated with skepticism regarding COVID-19. Alternatively, older participants and those who experienced greater anxiety related to the pandemic were less skeptical of COVID-19. Interestingly, people who experienced more interference in their lives because of COVID-19 were more skeptical of the pandemic. Finally, social media use moderated the influence of anxiety and interference on skepticism. The negative effect of anxiety on skepticism became weaker as people’s use of social media increased. The positive effect of interference related to COVID-19 on skepticism became stronger as people used more social media. Our findings underscore the importance of personal beliefs, attitudes, and experiences when explaining skepticism of the pandemic.
探讨基于个人和社交媒体的因素对 COVID-19 的认知怀疑判断的影响
对 COVID-19 持怀疑态度会影响公众健康。我们研究了与怀疑态度相关的几个变量,包括人口统计因素、人们对 COVID-19 的看法和经历以及社交媒体的使用情况。样本由 2020 年 4 月招募的 294 名参与者组成。参与者填写了一份调查问卷,其中包括与人口统计学、社交媒体使用、COVID-19焦虑、COVID-19干扰和COVID-19怀疑论相关的问题。主要结果显示,生理性别、种族和社交媒体使用情况与对 COVID-19 的怀疑态度没有明显关联。另外,年龄较大和对大流行病焦虑程度较高的参与者对 COVID-19 的怀疑程度较低。有趣的是,因 COVID-19 而生活受到更多干扰的人对该流行病的怀疑程度更高。最后,社交媒体的使用调节了焦虑和干扰对怀疑论的影响。焦虑对怀疑论的负面影响随着人们使用社交媒体的增加而减弱。随着人们使用社交媒体的增加,与 COVID-19 相关的干扰对怀疑论的积极影响也变得更强。我们的研究结果强调了个人信仰、态度和经历在解释对大流行病的怀疑态度时的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信