Managerial involvement and accountability of public sector accountants

Yan Daevid Lira Guimarães, Cláudio Wanderley, Jeronymo José Libonati
{"title":"Managerial involvement and accountability of public sector accountants","authors":"Yan Daevid Lira Guimarães, Cláudio Wanderley, Jeronymo José Libonati","doi":"10.16930/2237-7662202434552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EThis study aims to identify the involvement of accountants working in the public sector in managerial decisions and the accountability process, analyzing the relationship between these two types of involvement with role conflict, job satisfaction, and professional prestige. The study adopts a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional design using survey research techniques. The questionnaire was administered to a sample of 215 Brazilian public sector accountants. The study reveals that public sector accountants are more involved in operational decision-making activities and less involved in strategic decisions. They also show low involvement in activities related to managerial decisions and financial and performance accountability. Additionally, the study demonstrates a significant relationship between involvement, role conflict, and professional prestige. Thus, despite the changing environment for accountants and public accounting, respondents in the study are still relatively less involved in these processes. Furthermore, the more involved they are in their roles, the more susceptible these professionals are to role conflicts in their duties, although their perception of professional prestige increase.","PeriodicalId":516890,"journal":{"name":"Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-7662202434552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

EThis study aims to identify the involvement of accountants working in the public sector in managerial decisions and the accountability process, analyzing the relationship between these two types of involvement with role conflict, job satisfaction, and professional prestige. The study adopts a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional design using survey research techniques. The questionnaire was administered to a sample of 215 Brazilian public sector accountants. The study reveals that public sector accountants are more involved in operational decision-making activities and less involved in strategic decisions. They also show low involvement in activities related to managerial decisions and financial and performance accountability. Additionally, the study demonstrates a significant relationship between involvement, role conflict, and professional prestige. Thus, despite the changing environment for accountants and public accounting, respondents in the study are still relatively less involved in these processes. Furthermore, the more involved they are in their roles, the more susceptible these professionals are to role conflicts in their duties, although their perception of professional prestige increase.
公共部门会计师的管理参与和问责制
本研究旨在确定在公共部门工作的会计师参与管理决策和问责过程的情况,分析这两类参与与角色冲突、工作满意度和职业声望之间的关系。本研究采用定量方法,使用调查研究技术进行横截面设计。对 215 名巴西公共部门会计师进行了抽样问卷调查。研究显示,公共部门会计师更多地参与业务决策活动,而较少参与战略决策。他们在与管理决策、财务和绩效问责有关的活动中的参与度也较低。此外,研究还表明参与度、角色冲突和职业声望之间存在显著关系。因此,尽管会计师和公共会计的环境在不断变化,但研究中的受访者在这些过程中的参与度仍然相对较低。此外,参与程度越高,这些专业人员在履行职责时就越容易出现角色冲突,尽管他们对专业声望的认知会提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信