Bibliometric and literature synthesis on assisted natural regeneration: an evidence base for forest and landscape restoration in the tropics

T. Oluwajuwon, R. Chazdon, L. Ota, Nestor Gregorio, J. Herbohn
{"title":"Bibliometric and literature synthesis on assisted natural regeneration: an evidence base for forest and landscape restoration in the tropics","authors":"T. Oluwajuwon, R. Chazdon, L. Ota, Nestor Gregorio, J. Herbohn","doi":"10.3389/ffgc.2024.1412075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assisted Natural Regeneration (ANR) is a set of restoration strategies and interventions primarily based on natural regeneration, aimed at accelerating succession and providing multiple benefits in degraded ecosystems and landscapes. These strategies have the potential to significantly contribute to global Forest and Landscape Restoration efforts. However, ANR faces challenges due to limited recognition, support, and formal integration into relevant sectors and restoration policies, particularly in tropical regions. The dearth of evidence-based syntheses further compounds these challenges. To address this gap, a bibliometric analysis of selected scientific publications on ANR (n = 208) from 1987 to 2023 was conducted, using Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. A systematic review was undertaken, using a subset of original research articles (n = 44), to synthesize published data on interventions, contexts, costs, and benefits of ANR and to identify major knowledge gaps. Analysis of bibliometric metadata revealed an increasing annual output of ANR publications in over 80 journals, encompassing various document types and authors from over 40 countries. Despite ANR’s formal emergence in the Philippines, Brazil has taken the lead in both its research and implementation, and international collaboration in ANR research has grown. While ANR research focused mostly on ecosystem services and ecological outcomes, social aspects have been poorly studied. Diverse ANR interventions align not only with ecological restoration but also with integrated land management, biodiversity conservation, forest and landscape restoration, and forest management. The cost-effectiveness of ANR implementation, especially in restoration for carbon storage, exhibited considerable variability when compared to active tree planting, and varied with intervention types, time, land use history, and long-term costs. This synthesis provides critical insights and evidence to enhance the effective integration of ANR into restoration and reforestation programs and policies.","PeriodicalId":507254,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","volume":"5 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1412075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assisted Natural Regeneration (ANR) is a set of restoration strategies and interventions primarily based on natural regeneration, aimed at accelerating succession and providing multiple benefits in degraded ecosystems and landscapes. These strategies have the potential to significantly contribute to global Forest and Landscape Restoration efforts. However, ANR faces challenges due to limited recognition, support, and formal integration into relevant sectors and restoration policies, particularly in tropical regions. The dearth of evidence-based syntheses further compounds these challenges. To address this gap, a bibliometric analysis of selected scientific publications on ANR (n = 208) from 1987 to 2023 was conducted, using Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. A systematic review was undertaken, using a subset of original research articles (n = 44), to synthesize published data on interventions, contexts, costs, and benefits of ANR and to identify major knowledge gaps. Analysis of bibliometric metadata revealed an increasing annual output of ANR publications in over 80 journals, encompassing various document types and authors from over 40 countries. Despite ANR’s formal emergence in the Philippines, Brazil has taken the lead in both its research and implementation, and international collaboration in ANR research has grown. While ANR research focused mostly on ecosystem services and ecological outcomes, social aspects have been poorly studied. Diverse ANR interventions align not only with ecological restoration but also with integrated land management, biodiversity conservation, forest and landscape restoration, and forest management. The cost-effectiveness of ANR implementation, especially in restoration for carbon storage, exhibited considerable variability when compared to active tree planting, and varied with intervention types, time, land use history, and long-term costs. This synthesis provides critical insights and evidence to enhance the effective integration of ANR into restoration and reforestation programs and policies.
关于辅助自然再生的文献计量和文献综述:热带地区森林和景观恢复的证据基础
辅助自然再生(ANR)是一套主要基于自然再生的恢复战略和干预措施,旨在加速退化生态系统和景观的演替并提供多重效益。这些战略有可能为全球森林和景观恢复工作做出重大贡献。然而,由于对 ANR 的认可、支持以及将其正式纳入相关部门和恢复政策的程度有限,ANR 面临着各种挑战,尤其是在热带地区。以证据为基础的综述的缺乏进一步加剧了这些挑战。为弥补这一不足,我们利用 "科学网 "和 "谷歌学术 "数据库,对 1987 年至 2023 年间有关 ANR 的部分科学出版物(n = 208)进行了文献计量分析。利用原始研究文章子集(n = 44)进行了系统综述,以综合已发表的有关 ANR 的干预措施、背景、成本和效益的数据,并找出主要的知识差距。对文献计量元数据的分析表明,每年在 80 多种期刊上发表的 ANR 论文数量不断增加,其中包括来自 40 多个国家的各种文件类型和作者。尽管非洲自然资源研究在菲律宾正式兴起,但巴西在其研究和实施方面一直处于领先地位,而且非洲自然资源研究方面的国际合作也在不断增加。虽然非洲自然资源研究主要集中在生态系统服务和生态成果方面,但对社会方面的研究却很少。ANR 的干预措施多种多样,不仅涉及生态恢复,还涉及土地综合管理、生物多样性保护、森林和景观恢复以及森林管理。与积极植树相比,实施人工林恢复的成本效益,尤其是碳储存恢复的成本效益,表现出相当大的差异,并且因干预类型、时间、土地使用历史和长期成本而异。本综述提供了重要的见解和证据,有助于将 ANR 有效纳入恢复和再造林计划与政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信