Underlying Causes of NIMBY Conflicts in Power Grid Construction Projects: An ISM–BN Model Perspective

Tao Jiang, Zhenchao Xu, Busheng Zhou, Qingyun Zhang, Yong Liu
{"title":"Underlying Causes of NIMBY Conflicts in Power Grid Construction Projects: An ISM–BN Model Perspective","authors":"Tao Jiang, Zhenchao Xu, Busheng Zhou, Qingyun Zhang, Yong Liu","doi":"10.3390/buildings14072140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Not In My Back Yard” (NIMBY) conflicts have emerged as a significant challenge in the siting and construction of power grid projects. Traditional risk management methods are often inadequate for addressing the complex interactions between the multiple factors involved in such projects. To explain the relationship between different influencing factors, this paper constructs the hierarchy between the influencing factors using the Interpretive Structural Model (ISM) and carries out a causal analysis of NIMBY conflicts in power grid construction projects using the Bayesian network model. The results of the ISM hierarchical map show that high risk perception and construction practices lacking refinement are the most direct causes of NIMBY incidents. The Bayesian network model indicates that poor construction practices, negative public opinion, high risk perception, inadequate risk assessment and emergency response mechanisms, and negative externalities are the most sensitive factors within the causal system of NIMBY incidents and require priority attention. An increase in risk perception is also found to significantly escalate the severity of NIMBY conflicts. The insights gleaned in this study may provide valuable guidance for managing NIMBY conflicts in power grid construction projects.","PeriodicalId":505657,"journal":{"name":"Buildings","volume":"47 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Not In My Back Yard” (NIMBY) conflicts have emerged as a significant challenge in the siting and construction of power grid projects. Traditional risk management methods are often inadequate for addressing the complex interactions between the multiple factors involved in such projects. To explain the relationship between different influencing factors, this paper constructs the hierarchy between the influencing factors using the Interpretive Structural Model (ISM) and carries out a causal analysis of NIMBY conflicts in power grid construction projects using the Bayesian network model. The results of the ISM hierarchical map show that high risk perception and construction practices lacking refinement are the most direct causes of NIMBY incidents. The Bayesian network model indicates that poor construction practices, negative public opinion, high risk perception, inadequate risk assessment and emergency response mechanisms, and negative externalities are the most sensitive factors within the causal system of NIMBY incidents and require priority attention. An increase in risk perception is also found to significantly escalate the severity of NIMBY conflicts. The insights gleaned in this study may provide valuable guidance for managing NIMBY conflicts in power grid construction projects.
电网建设项目中 NIMBY 冲突的根本原因:ISM-BN 模型视角
"不在我家后院"(NIMBY)冲突已成为电网项目选址和建设过程中的一个重大挑战。传统的风险管理方法往往不足以应对此类项目所涉及的多种因素之间复杂的相互作用。为了解释不同影响因素之间的关系,本文利用解释结构模型(ISM)构建了影响因素之间的层次结构,并利用贝叶斯网络模型对电网建设项目中的 NIMBY 冲突进行了因果分析。ISM 层次图的结果表明,高风险感知和缺乏精细化的施工实践是 NIMBY 事件的最直接原因。贝叶斯网络模型表明,不良施工做法、负面舆论、高风险感知、不完善的风险评估和应急机制以及负外部性是非当地居民事件因果系统中最敏感的因素,需要优先关注。研究还发现,风险意识的增强也会大大加剧 "近邻 "冲突的严重程度。本研究得出的见解可为管理电网建设项目中的 NIMBY 冲突提供有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信