E-SERS: An Enhanced Approach to Trust-Based Ranking of Apps

Software Pub Date : 2024-07-13 DOI:10.3390/software3030013
N. Chowdhury, Ayush Maharjan, R. Raje
{"title":"E-SERS: An Enhanced Approach to Trust-Based Ranking of Apps","authors":"N. Chowdhury, Ayush Maharjan, R. Raje","doi":"10.3390/software3030013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of mobile applications (“Apps”) has grown significantly in recent years. App Stores rank/recommend Apps based on factors such as average star ratings and the number of installs. Such rankings do not focus on the internal artifacts of Apps (e.g., security vulnerabilities). If internal artifacts are ignored, users may fail to estimate the potential risks associated with installing Apps. In this research, we present a framework called E-SERS (Enhanced Security-related and Evidence-based Ranking Scheme) for comparing Android Apps that offer similar functionalities. E-SERS uses internal and external artifacts of Apps in the ranking process. E-SERS is a significant enhancement of our past evidence-based ranking framework called SERS. We have evaluated E-SERS on publicly accessible Apps from the Google Play Store and compared our rankings with prevalent ranking techniques. Our experiments demonstrate that E-SERS, leveraging its holistic approach, excels in identifying malicious Apps and consistently outperforms existing alternatives in ranking accuracy. By emphasizing comprehensive assessment, E-SERS empowers users, particularly those less experienced with technology, to make informed decisions and avoid potentially harmful Apps. This contribution addresses a critical gap in current App-ranking methodologies, enhancing the safety and security of today’s technologically dependent society.","PeriodicalId":516628,"journal":{"name":"Software","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Software","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/software3030013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of mobile applications (“Apps”) has grown significantly in recent years. App Stores rank/recommend Apps based on factors such as average star ratings and the number of installs. Such rankings do not focus on the internal artifacts of Apps (e.g., security vulnerabilities). If internal artifacts are ignored, users may fail to estimate the potential risks associated with installing Apps. In this research, we present a framework called E-SERS (Enhanced Security-related and Evidence-based Ranking Scheme) for comparing Android Apps that offer similar functionalities. E-SERS uses internal and external artifacts of Apps in the ranking process. E-SERS is a significant enhancement of our past evidence-based ranking framework called SERS. We have evaluated E-SERS on publicly accessible Apps from the Google Play Store and compared our rankings with prevalent ranking techniques. Our experiments demonstrate that E-SERS, leveraging its holistic approach, excels in identifying malicious Apps and consistently outperforms existing alternatives in ranking accuracy. By emphasizing comprehensive assessment, E-SERS empowers users, particularly those less experienced with technology, to make informed decisions and avoid potentially harmful Apps. This contribution addresses a critical gap in current App-ranking methodologies, enhancing the safety and security of today’s technologically dependent society.
E-SERS:基于信任的应用程序排名增强方法
近年来,移动应用程序("应用程序")的数量大幅增长。应用程序商店根据平均星级评分和安装数量等因素对应用程序进行排名/推荐。此类排名并不关注应用程序的内部工件(如安全漏洞)。如果忽略内部工件,用户可能无法估计与安装应用程序相关的潜在风险。在这项研究中,我们提出了一个名为 E-SERS(增强安全相关和基于证据的排名方案)的框架,用于比较提供类似功能的安卓应用程序。E-SERS 在排名过程中使用了应用程序的内部和外部工件。E-SERS 是我们过去基于证据的排名框架 SERS 的重大改进。我们在 Google Play 商店公开访问的应用程序上对 E-SERS 进行了评估,并将我们的排名与流行的排名技术进行了比较。我们的实验证明,E-SERS 利用其整体方法,在识别恶意应用程序方面表现出色,并且在排名准确性方面一直优于现有的替代方法。通过强调综合评估,E-SERS 使用户,尤其是那些技术经验不足的用户,能够做出明智的决定,避免使用可能有害的应用程序。这一贡献弥补了当前应用程序排名方法中的一个重要空白,增强了当今依赖技术的社会的安全保障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信