Does type 1 diabetes serve as a protective factor against inflammatory bowel disease: A Mendelian randomization study

Keke Tong, Yunfeng Yu, Xinyu Yang, Jing Wu, Rong Yu, Chuanchuan Tan
{"title":"Does type 1 diabetes serve as a protective factor against inflammatory bowel disease: A Mendelian randomization study","authors":"Keke Tong, Yunfeng Yu, Xinyu Yang, Jing Wu, Rong Yu, Chuanchuan Tan","doi":"10.4239/wjd.v15.i7.1551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n The impact of type 1 diabetes (T1D) on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unclear.\n AIM\n To analyze the causal relationship between T1D and IBD using Mendelian ran-domization (MR).\n METHODS\n Single nucleotide polymorphisms were sourced from FinnGen for T1D, IBD, ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Inverse variance-weighted, MR-Egger, and weighted median tests were used to assess exposure-outcome causality. The MR-Egger intercept was used to assess horizontal pleiotropy. Co-chran’s Q and leave-one-out method were used to analyze heterogeneity and sensitivity, respectively.\n RESULTS\n Our MR analysis indicated that T1D was associated with a reduced risk of IBD [odds ratio (OR): 0.959; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.938-0.980; P < 0.001] and UC (OR: 0.960; 95%CI: 0.929-0.992; P = 0.015), with no significant association observed in terms of CD risk (OR: 0.966; 95%CI: 0.913-1.022; P = 0.227). The MR-Egger intercept showed no horizontal pleiotropy (P > 0.05). Cochran’s Q and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses showed that the results were not heterogeneous (P > 0.05) and were robust.\n CONCLUSION\n This MR analysis suggests that T1D serves as a potential protective factor against IBD and UC but is independent of CD.","PeriodicalId":509005,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v15.i7.1551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The impact of type 1 diabetes (T1D) on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unclear. AIM To analyze the causal relationship between T1D and IBD using Mendelian ran-domization (MR). METHODS Single nucleotide polymorphisms were sourced from FinnGen for T1D, IBD, ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Inverse variance-weighted, MR-Egger, and weighted median tests were used to assess exposure-outcome causality. The MR-Egger intercept was used to assess horizontal pleiotropy. Co-chran’s Q and leave-one-out method were used to analyze heterogeneity and sensitivity, respectively. RESULTS Our MR analysis indicated that T1D was associated with a reduced risk of IBD [odds ratio (OR): 0.959; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.938-0.980; P < 0.001] and UC (OR: 0.960; 95%CI: 0.929-0.992; P = 0.015), with no significant association observed in terms of CD risk (OR: 0.966; 95%CI: 0.913-1.022; P = 0.227). The MR-Egger intercept showed no horizontal pleiotropy (P > 0.05). Cochran’s Q and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses showed that the results were not heterogeneous (P > 0.05) and were robust. CONCLUSION This MR analysis suggests that T1D serves as a potential protective factor against IBD and UC but is independent of CD.
1 型糖尿病是否是炎症性肠病的保护因素:孟德尔随机研究
背景 1 型糖尿病(T1D)对炎症性肠病(IBD)的影响仍不清楚。目的 利用孟德尔多态性(Mendelian ran-domization,MR)分析 T1D 与 IBD 之间的因果关系。方法 从 FinnGen 中获取 T1D、IBD、溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD)的单核苷酸多态性。采用逆方差加权、MR-Egger 和加权中位数检验来评估暴露-结果的因果关系。MR-Egger截距用于评估水平多向性。Co-chran's Q 和 leave-one-out 方法分别用于分析异质性和敏感性。结果 我们的MR分析表明,T1D与IBD风险降低有关[比值比(OR):0.959;95%置信区间(CI):0.938-0.980;P < 0.001],与UC(OR:0.960;95%CI:0.929-0.992;P = 0.015)有关,而与CD风险(OR:0.966;95%CI:0.913-1.022;P = 0.227)无显著关联。MR-Egger截距未显示水平多向性(P > 0.05)。Cochran's Q 和leave-one-out 敏感性分析表明,结果没有异质性(P > 0.05),并且是稳健的。结论 MR分析表明,T1D是IBD和UC的潜在保护因素,但与CD无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信