Application of uncertainty quantification techniques in the framework of process safety studies: Advanced dispersion simulations

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Marco Bellegoni, Giulia Marroni, Alessandro Mariotti, Maria Vittoria Salvetti, Gabriele Landucci, Chiara Galletti
{"title":"Application of uncertainty quantification techniques in the framework of process safety studies: Advanced dispersion simulations","authors":"Marco Bellegoni,&nbsp;Giulia Marroni,&nbsp;Alessandro Mariotti,&nbsp;Maria Vittoria Salvetti,&nbsp;Gabriele Landucci,&nbsp;Chiara Galletti","doi":"10.1002/cjce.25410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the framework of process safety studies, consequence assessment of accidental scenarios is a crucial step affecting the eventual risk profile associated with the facilities under analysis. Conventional models used for consequence assessment are based on integral models, and may not be adequate to cope with the dynamic evolution of accidental scenarios and their three-dimensional features. On the other hand, consequence assessment models based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approaches are promising to cope with complex scenarios and environments, but setting the simulation introduces relevant uncertainties associated with both the input data, assumptions, and with the modelling of physical effects involved. In the present study, uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques are applied to support advanced safety studies based on CFD simulations of hazardous gas dispersion. Firstly, the accidental scenarios are characterized by defining release scenarios and conditions and quantifying source terms using integral models. At the same time, input meteorological data are gathered. This enables the development of high-fidelity CFD simulations of gas dispersion based on different input sets and eventually the implementation of UQ techniques. The generalized polynomial chaos (gPC) expansion is employed to obtain hazardous gas concentration based on the variation of wind direction and speed. The present method is applied for the analysis of a real plant featuring a complex layout. The results show the advantages of the present approach by quantifying the influence of meteorological conditions and providing indications for supporting the development of protection systems and emergency measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":9400,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"102 12","pages":"4072-4084"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjce.25410","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the framework of process safety studies, consequence assessment of accidental scenarios is a crucial step affecting the eventual risk profile associated with the facilities under analysis. Conventional models used for consequence assessment are based on integral models, and may not be adequate to cope with the dynamic evolution of accidental scenarios and their three-dimensional features. On the other hand, consequence assessment models based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approaches are promising to cope with complex scenarios and environments, but setting the simulation introduces relevant uncertainties associated with both the input data, assumptions, and with the modelling of physical effects involved. In the present study, uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques are applied to support advanced safety studies based on CFD simulations of hazardous gas dispersion. Firstly, the accidental scenarios are characterized by defining release scenarios and conditions and quantifying source terms using integral models. At the same time, input meteorological data are gathered. This enables the development of high-fidelity CFD simulations of gas dispersion based on different input sets and eventually the implementation of UQ techniques. The generalized polynomial chaos (gPC) expansion is employed to obtain hazardous gas concentration based on the variation of wind direction and speed. The present method is applied for the analysis of a real plant featuring a complex layout. The results show the advantages of the present approach by quantifying the influence of meteorological conditions and providing indications for supporting the development of protection systems and emergency measures.

在工艺安全研究框架内应用不确定性量化技术:高级分散模拟
在工艺安全研究框架内,事故情景后果评估是影响与所分析设施相关的最终风险概况的关键步骤。用于后果评估的传统模型以整体模型为基础,可能不足以应对事故情景的动态演变及其三维特征。另一方面,基于计算流体动力学(CFD)方法的后果评估模型很有希望应对复杂的情景和环境,但设置模拟会引入与输入数据、假设和相关物理效应建模有关的不确定性。在本研究中,不确定性量化(UQ)技术被用于支持基于有害气体扩散的 CFD 模拟的高级安全研究。首先,通过定义释放情景和条件,并使用积分模型量化源项,确定事故情景的特征。同时,收集输入气象数据。这样就可以根据不同的输入集开发高保真的气体扩散 CFD 模拟,并最终实施 UQ 技术。根据风向和风速的变化,采用广义多项式混沌(gPC)展开法获得有害气体浓度。本方法被用于分析一个布局复杂的真实工厂。结果显示了本方法的优势,即量化了气象条件的影响,并为支持保护系统和应急措施的开发提供了指示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
448
审稿时长
3.2 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering (CJChE) publishes original research articles, new theoretical interpretation or experimental findings and critical reviews in the science or industrial practice of chemical and biochemical processes. Preference is given to papers having a clearly indicated scope and applicability in any of the following areas: Fluid mechanics, heat and mass transfer, multiphase flows, separations processes, thermodynamics, process systems engineering, reactors and reaction kinetics, catalysis, interfacial phenomena, electrochemical phenomena, bioengineering, minerals processing and natural products and environmental and energy engineering. Papers that merely describe or present a conventional or routine analysis of existing processes will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信