Interobserver Agreement of visual and semi-quantitative methods in 99mTc-Methoxy-Isobuty-Isonitrile (MIBI) imaging for risk stratification of hypofunctional thyroid nodules.

Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1055/a-2344-6752
Jana Vogel, Sarvar Haghghi, Corinna Herkula, Manuela Petersen, Philipp Seifert, Thekla Wallbaum, Simone Agnes Schenke, Michael C Kreissl
{"title":"Interobserver Agreement of visual and semi-quantitative methods in 99mTc-Methoxy-Isobuty-Isonitrile (MIBI) imaging for risk stratification of hypofunctional thyroid nodules.","authors":"Jana Vogel, Sarvar Haghghi, Corinna Herkula, Manuela Petersen, Philipp Seifert, Thekla Wallbaum, Simone Agnes Schenke, Michael C Kreissl","doi":"10.1055/a-2344-6752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>99mTc-Methoxy-Isobuty-Isonitrile (MIBI) imaging is used for risk stratifications of hypofunctioning thyroid nodules (TNs). MIBI uptake in the nodular tissue is compared to the uptake in the paranodular thyroid tissue. MIBI imaging may be interpreted visually and/or semi-quantitatively. This study aimed to evaluate the interobserver agreement (IOA) of different methods of interpreting MIBI imaging (visual and semi-quantitative approaches).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MIBI imaging data from 2018 to 2020 were collected. Four readers with varying work experience prospectively evaluated MIBI images (planar, SPECT/CT) visually and semi-quantitatively (Wash-Out Index (WOI)). After identifying the nodules on 99mTc-pertechnetate scintigram, the readers evaluated MIBI imaging data by using early, late, early-to-late, and SPECT late acquisitions. Region of interests (ROIs) were defined for semi-quantitative analysis and average counts were calculated using the WOI formula (by Campenni et al.) 1 2. IOA was assessed using Fleiss Kappa, Pearson correlation and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>23 patients with hypofunctioning nodules were included. Kappa analysis revealed an IOA of 0.57 for all readers for early imaging (moderate agreement); perfect matches were found in 57%. For late imaging, the IOA was 0.48 (moderate) for all, with perfect matches in 48%. The visual pattern (early-to-late) exhibited an IOA of 0.45 for all, with perfect matches in 57%. SPECT/CT evaluation showed an overall IOA of 0.44, with perfect matches in 48%. The semi-quantitative approach WOI yielded an overall result of 0.64 (good agreement) and perfect matches in 91%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IOA for WOI was higher than for visual methods. The WOI is independent of the reader's experience level. Visual analysis requires a certain level of experience from the reader.</p>","PeriodicalId":94161,"journal":{"name":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","volume":" ","pages":"294-299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2344-6752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: 99mTc-Methoxy-Isobuty-Isonitrile (MIBI) imaging is used for risk stratifications of hypofunctioning thyroid nodules (TNs). MIBI uptake in the nodular tissue is compared to the uptake in the paranodular thyroid tissue. MIBI imaging may be interpreted visually and/or semi-quantitatively. This study aimed to evaluate the interobserver agreement (IOA) of different methods of interpreting MIBI imaging (visual and semi-quantitative approaches).

Methods: MIBI imaging data from 2018 to 2020 were collected. Four readers with varying work experience prospectively evaluated MIBI images (planar, SPECT/CT) visually and semi-quantitatively (Wash-Out Index (WOI)). After identifying the nodules on 99mTc-pertechnetate scintigram, the readers evaluated MIBI imaging data by using early, late, early-to-late, and SPECT late acquisitions. Region of interests (ROIs) were defined for semi-quantitative analysis and average counts were calculated using the WOI formula (by Campenni et al.) 1 2. IOA was assessed using Fleiss Kappa, Pearson correlation and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).

Results: 23 patients with hypofunctioning nodules were included. Kappa analysis revealed an IOA of 0.57 for all readers for early imaging (moderate agreement); perfect matches were found in 57%. For late imaging, the IOA was 0.48 (moderate) for all, with perfect matches in 48%. The visual pattern (early-to-late) exhibited an IOA of 0.45 for all, with perfect matches in 57%. SPECT/CT evaluation showed an overall IOA of 0.44, with perfect matches in 48%. The semi-quantitative approach WOI yielded an overall result of 0.64 (good agreement) and perfect matches in 91%.

Conclusion: The IOA for WOI was higher than for visual methods. The WOI is independent of the reader's experience level. Visual analysis requires a certain level of experience from the reader.

99m锝-甲氧基异丁腈(MIBI)成像用于功能减退性甲状腺结节风险分层的视觉和半定量方法的观察者间一致性。
目的:99m锝-甲氧基异丁腈(MIBI)成像用于功能低下甲状腺结节(TNs)的风险分层。结节组织中的 MIBI 摄取量与甲状腺结节旁组织中的 MIBI 摄取量进行比较。MIBI成像可通过肉眼和/或半定量方式进行解读。本研究旨在评估不同MIBI成像解读方法(视觉和半定量方法)的观察者间一致性(IOA):收集了2018年至2020年的MIBI成像数据。四名具有不同工作经验的阅读者前瞻性地对 MIBI 图像(平面、SPECT/CT)进行了视觉和半定量(冲洗指数(WOI))评估。在确定 99mTc-pertechnetate 闪烁扫描图像上的结节后,阅读者通过早期、晚期、早至晚期和 SPECT 晚期采集来评估 MIBI 成像数据。定义感兴趣区(ROI)用于半定量分析,并使用 WOI 公式(Campenni 等人)计算平均计数1 2。结果:共纳入 23 名功能低下结节患者。Kappa 分析显示,在早期成像方面,所有读片者的 IOA 均为 0.57(中度吻合);完全吻合者占 57%。对于晚期成像,所有读片者的 IOA 均为 0.48(中度),完全匹配者占 48%。视觉模式(从早期到晚期)显示,所有人的 IOA 均为 0.45,完全匹配者占 57%。SPECT/CT 评估显示总体 IOA 为 0.44,完全匹配者占 48%。半定量方法 WOI 的总体结果为 0.64(良好的一致性),完全匹配的比例为 91%:结论:WOI 的 IOA 高于视觉方法。WOI 与读者的经验水平无关。视觉分析需要读者具备一定的经验水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信