[Collaboration between care teams and care experts in home care nursing: A qualitative case study].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Pflege Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1024/1012-5302/a001003
Aline Regez, Marina Preisig, Franzisca Domeisen Benedetti
{"title":"[Collaboration between care teams and care experts in home care nursing: A qualitative case study].","authors":"Aline Regez, Marina Preisig, Franzisca Domeisen Benedetti","doi":"10.1024/1012-5302/a001003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Collaboration between care teams and care experts in home care nursing: A qualitative case study <b>Abstract:</b> <i>Background:</i> As a result of demographic change and the associated ageing population, the number of people affected by multimorbidity is increasing, and with it the complexity of home care nursing. In a home care nursing service (Spitex), care teams work with employees of different levels of competence. For support in complex situations, they can seek help from nursing experts (PEX). <i>Aim:</i> The aim was to investigate the collaboration between the care teams and the PEX of a regional Spitex organization and to work out measures for optimization. The research question was: \"How do the care teams of a regional Spitex organization experience the collaboration with the nursing experts?\" <i>Methods:</i> A qualitative case study design with four sub-cases was used to describe in detail how collaboration with PEX is experienced. Four Focus group interviews were evaluated using content analysis and cross-case analysis. <i>Results:</i> The Cross-Case analysis reveals the categories for optimal collaboration: present, professionally versatile, relieving in coordination tasks, supportive in complex situations. The following categories are categorized as disruptive factors in collaboration: varying levels of commitment, collaboration low priority and confusing. <i>Conclusions:</i> The PEX are to be made better known through targeted information dissemination. Implications for practice include the importance of presence and mutual understanding of roles so that collaboration is experienced as added value.</p>","PeriodicalId":54625,"journal":{"name":"Pflege","volume":" ","pages":"63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pflege","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a001003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaboration between care teams and care experts in home care nursing: A qualitative case study Abstract: Background: As a result of demographic change and the associated ageing population, the number of people affected by multimorbidity is increasing, and with it the complexity of home care nursing. In a home care nursing service (Spitex), care teams work with employees of different levels of competence. For support in complex situations, they can seek help from nursing experts (PEX). Aim: The aim was to investigate the collaboration between the care teams and the PEX of a regional Spitex organization and to work out measures for optimization. The research question was: "How do the care teams of a regional Spitex organization experience the collaboration with the nursing experts?" Methods: A qualitative case study design with four sub-cases was used to describe in detail how collaboration with PEX is experienced. Four Focus group interviews were evaluated using content analysis and cross-case analysis. Results: The Cross-Case analysis reveals the categories for optimal collaboration: present, professionally versatile, relieving in coordination tasks, supportive in complex situations. The following categories are categorized as disruptive factors in collaboration: varying levels of commitment, collaboration low priority and confusing. Conclusions: The PEX are to be made better known through targeted information dissemination. Implications for practice include the importance of presence and mutual understanding of roles so that collaboration is experienced as added value.

[护理小组与护理专家在家庭护理中的合作:定性案例研究]。
家庭护理中护理团队与护理专家之间的合作:定性案例研究 摘要:背景:由于人口结构的变化和与之相关的人口老龄化,受多重疾病影响的人数不断增加,家庭护理的复杂性也随之增加。在家庭护理服务(Spitex)中,护理团队与不同能力水平的员工一起工作。在复杂情况下,他们可以寻求护理专家(PEX)的帮助。目的:旨在调查一家地区 Spitex 机构的护理团队与 PEX 之间的合作情况,并制定优化措施。研究问题是"地区 Spitex 机构的护理团队如何体验与护理专家的合作?研究方法:采用定性案例研究设计,包含四个子案例,以详细描述如何体验与 PEX 的合作。通过内容分析和交叉分析对四个焦点小组访谈进行了评估。结果:交叉案例分析揭示了最佳协作的类别:在场、专业上多才多艺、在协调任务中提供帮助、在复杂情况下提供支持。以下类别被归类为破坏合作的因素:不同程度的承诺、合作的低优先级和混乱。结论:应通过有针对性的信息传播更好地宣传 PEX。对实践的启示包括:存在的重要性和对角色的相互理解,从而使合作体验到附加值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pflege
Pflege NURSING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pflege ist die erste unabhängige wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für die Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege im deutschen Sprachbereich. Sie trägt zur Entwicklung der Pflegewissenschaft sowie zur Qualität der Pflege in der Praxis bei. Die Zeitschrift versteht sich als umfassendes Forum, in welchem die sich rasch entwickelnden Bereiche der Pflegeforschung, -theorie und -praxis sowie der Ausbildung, des Managements, der Ethik, Geschichte und Politik der Pflege diskutiert werden können. Zusammenfassungen von Forschungsberichten und Mitteilungen aus der internationalen Pflegeszene, Buchbesprechungen und der internationale Kongresskalender ermöglichen der Leserschaft, sich einen Überblick über das aktuelle Geschehen zu verschaffen, sich bezüglich berufsspezifischer Literatur auf dem Laufenden zu halten, um somit die Weiterbildung gezielt zu gestalten. Pflege publiziert Beiträge, die eine hohe Relevanz für Praxis, Forschung, Theorie, Ausbildung, Ethik, Geschichte, Politik und das Management in der Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum haben. Manuskripte ohne Bezug zur Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum werden abgelehnt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信