The Development and Pilot Testing of a Fidelity Checklist for a Family-Centered Telehealth Intervention for Parents of Children with Motor Delay.

IF 2.5 Q1 REHABILITATION
International Journal of Telerehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-06-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5195/ijt.2024.6603
Karen Hurtubise, Michelle Phoenix, Chantal Camden, Raphaëlle Gauthier, Paul Stratford, Rosalie Dostie, Audrée Jeanne Beaudoin, Désirée Maltais, Jade Berbari, Isabelle Gaboury
{"title":"The Development and Pilot Testing of a Fidelity Checklist for a Family-Centered Telehealth Intervention for Parents of Children with Motor Delay.","authors":"Karen Hurtubise, Michelle Phoenix, Chantal Camden, Raphaëlle Gauthier, Paul Stratford, Rosalie Dostie, Audrée Jeanne Beaudoin, Désirée Maltais, Jade Berbari, Isabelle Gaboury","doi":"10.5195/ijt.2024.6603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This multi-methods study describes the development of a pediatric rehabilitation telehealth intervention fidelity checklist, estimates its inter-rater reliability, and documents raters' implementation experience. A literature scan and expert consultation identified eighteen key behaviors and categorized them into three subdomains, measured using a 5-point measurement system. To estimate the checklist's inter-rater reliability, three raters scored 33 video recordings. A Shrout and Fleiss Class 1,1 intraclass correlation (ICC)) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated ICCs = 0.5 (CI: 0, 0.9) for both the Therapist and the Parent-Therapists subdomains, and the Parent subdomain an ICC = 0.3 (CI: 0, 0.8). In the implementation surveys, raters reported high levels of satisfaction (100%), ease of use (84% to 88%), and confidence in their video ratings (87% to 100%). Changes in procedures and scoring were recommended. Capturing raters' implementation experiences is crucial in the early evaluation of the fidelity checklists for telehealth.</p>","PeriodicalId":45323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Telerehabilitation","volume":"16 1","pages":"e6603"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Telerehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2024.6603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This multi-methods study describes the development of a pediatric rehabilitation telehealth intervention fidelity checklist, estimates its inter-rater reliability, and documents raters' implementation experience. A literature scan and expert consultation identified eighteen key behaviors and categorized them into three subdomains, measured using a 5-point measurement system. To estimate the checklist's inter-rater reliability, three raters scored 33 video recordings. A Shrout and Fleiss Class 1,1 intraclass correlation (ICC)) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated ICCs = 0.5 (CI: 0, 0.9) for both the Therapist and the Parent-Therapists subdomains, and the Parent subdomain an ICC = 0.3 (CI: 0, 0.8). In the implementation surveys, raters reported high levels of satisfaction (100%), ease of use (84% to 88%), and confidence in their video ratings (87% to 100%). Changes in procedures and scoring were recommended. Capturing raters' implementation experiences is crucial in the early evaluation of the fidelity checklists for telehealth.

为运动发育迟缓儿童的家长开发和试点测试以家庭为中心的远程医疗干预的忠实性检查表。
这项多方法研究描述了儿科康复远程保健干预忠实性检查表的开发过程,估计了其评分者之间的可靠性,并记录了评分者的实施经验。通过文献扫描和专家咨询,确定了 18 种关键行为,并将其分为三个子域,使用 5 点测量系统进行测量。为了评估核对表的评分者之间的可靠性,三名评分者对 33 份视频记录进行了评分。根据 Shrout 和 Fleiss Class 1,1 类内相关性(ICC)和 95% 置信区间(CI)计算,治疗师和家长-治疗师子域的 ICC = 0.5(CI:0,0.9),家长子域的 ICC = 0.3(CI:0,0.8)。在实施情况调查中,评分者的满意度(100%)、易用性(84% 到 88%)和对视频评分的信心(87% 到 100%)都很高。建议对程序和评分进行修改。掌握评分者的实施经验对于远程医疗保真度检查表的早期评估至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
14
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信