The Chartered Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors at 75: perspectives on contemporary challenges and future directions for Ergonomics and Human Factors.

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Paul M Salmon, Catherine Burns, Suzy Broadbent, Satyan Chari, Robyn Clay-Williams, Peter A Hancock, Daniel P Jenkins, Ann Mills, Katie Parnell, Katherine L Plant, Gemma J M Read, Sarah Sharples, Steven Shorrock, Neville A Stanton, Guy H Walker, Claire Williams, Patrick Waterson, Mark S Young
{"title":"The Chartered Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors at 75: perspectives on contemporary challenges and future directions for Ergonomics and Human Factors.","authors":"Paul M Salmon, Catherine Burns, Suzy Broadbent, Satyan Chari, Robyn Clay-Williams, Peter A Hancock, Daniel P Jenkins, Ann Mills, Katie Parnell, Katherine L Plant, Gemma J M Read, Sarah Sharples, Steven Shorrock, Neville A Stanton, Guy H Walker, Claire Williams, Patrick Waterson, Mark S Young","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2024.2378355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the UK's Chartered Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors (CIEHF) celebrates its 75th anniversary, it is worth reflecting on our discipline's contribution, current state, and critical future endeavours. We present the perspectives of 18 EHF professionals who were asked to respond to five questions regarding the impact of EHF, contemporary challenges, and future directions. Co-authors were in agreement that EHF's impact has been only limited to date and that critical issues require resolution, such as increasing the number of suitably qualified practitioners, resolving the research-practice gap, and increasing awareness of EHF and its benefits. Frequently discussed future directions include advanced emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, the development of new EHF methods, and enhancing the quality and reach of education and training. The majority felt there will be a need for EHF in 75 years; however, many noted that our methods will need to adapt to meet new needs.<b>Practitioner statement:</b> This article provides the perspectives of 18 Ergonomics and Human Factors (EHF) professionals on the impact of EHF, contemporary challenges and critical future directions, and changes that are necessary to ensure EHF remains relevant in future. As such, it provides important guidance on future EHF research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2378355","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the UK's Chartered Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors (CIEHF) celebrates its 75th anniversary, it is worth reflecting on our discipline's contribution, current state, and critical future endeavours. We present the perspectives of 18 EHF professionals who were asked to respond to five questions regarding the impact of EHF, contemporary challenges, and future directions. Co-authors were in agreement that EHF's impact has been only limited to date and that critical issues require resolution, such as increasing the number of suitably qualified practitioners, resolving the research-practice gap, and increasing awareness of EHF and its benefits. Frequently discussed future directions include advanced emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, the development of new EHF methods, and enhancing the quality and reach of education and training. The majority felt there will be a need for EHF in 75 years; however, many noted that our methods will need to adapt to meet new needs.Practitioner statement: This article provides the perspectives of 18 Ergonomics and Human Factors (EHF) professionals on the impact of EHF, contemporary challenges and critical future directions, and changes that are necessary to ensure EHF remains relevant in future. As such, it provides important guidance on future EHF research and practice.

人类工效学与人为因素特许研究所 75 周年:对人类工效学与人为因素的当代挑战和未来方向的展望。
在英国特许人类工效学与人为因素研究所(CIEHF)庆祝其成立 75 周年之际,值得对我们这门学科的贡献、现状和未来的重要努力进行反思。我们介绍了 18 位人体工程学与人为因素专业人士的观点,他们被要求回答有关人体工程学与人为因素的影响、当代挑战和未来方向的五个问题。共同作者一致认为,迄今为止,EHF 的影响有限,需要解决一些关键问题,如增加合格从业人员的数量、解决研究与实践之间的差距以及提高对 EHF 及其益处的认识。经常讨论的未来方向包括先进的新兴技术(如人工智能)、开发新的 EHF 方法以及提高教育和培训的质量和覆盖面。大多数人认为,75 年后仍有必要开展 EHF;但是,许多人指出,我们的方法需要进行调整,以满足新的需求:这篇文章提供了 18 位人体工程学和人为因素(EHF)专业人士对 EHF 的影响、当代挑战和未来关键方向,以及确保 EHF 在未来保持相关性所需的变革的看法。因此,它为未来的人体工程学与人为因素研究和实践提供了重要指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ergonomics
Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives. The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people. All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信