PREDICTION OF TIME TO HEMODYNAMIC STABILIZATION OF UNSTABLE INJURED PATIENT ENCOUNTERS USING ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD DATA.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
SHOCK Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002420
Allison Carroll, Ravi Garg, Alona Furmanchuk, Alexander Lundberg, Casey M Silver, James Adams, Yuriy Moklyak, Thomas Tomasik, John Slocum, Jane Holl, Michael Shapiro, Nan Kong, Adin-Cristian Andrei, Abel Kho, Anne M Stey
{"title":"PREDICTION OF TIME TO HEMODYNAMIC STABILIZATION OF UNSTABLE INJURED PATIENT ENCOUNTERS USING ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD DATA.","authors":"Allison Carroll, Ravi Garg, Alona Furmanchuk, Alexander Lundberg, Casey M Silver, James Adams, Yuriy Moklyak, Thomas Tomasik, John Slocum, Jane Holl, Michael Shapiro, Nan Kong, Adin-Cristian Andrei, Abel Kho, Anne M Stey","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Background : This study sought to predict time to patient hemodynamic stabilization during trauma resuscitations of hypotensive patient encounters using electronic medical record (EMR) data. Methods: This observational cohort study leveraged EMR data from a nine-hospital academic system composed of Level I, Level II, and nontrauma centers. Injured, hemodynamically unstable (initial systolic blood pressure, <90 mm Hg) emergency encounters from 2015 to 2020 were identified. Stabilization was defined as documented subsequent systolic blood pressure of >90 mm Hg. We predicted time to stabilization testing random forests, gradient boosting, and ensembles using patient, injury, treatment, EPIC Trauma Narrator, and hospital features from the first 4 hours of care. Results: Of 177,127 encounters, 1,347 (0.8%) arrived hemodynamically unstable; 168 (12.5%) presented to Level I trauma centers, 853 (63.3%) to Level II, and 326 (24.2%) to nontrauma centers. Of those, 747 (55.5%) were stabilized with a median of 50 min (interquartile range, 21-101 min). Stabilization was documented in 94.6% of unstable patient encounters at Level I, 57.6% at Level II, and 29.8% at nontrauma centers ( P < 0.001). Time to stabilization was predicted with a C-index of 0.80. The most predictive features were EPIC Trauma Narrator measures, documented patient arrival, provider examination, and disposition decision. In-hospital mortality was highest at Level I, 3.0% vs. 1.2% at Level II, and 0.3% at nontrauma centers ( P < 0.001). Importantly, nontrauma centers had the highest retriage rate to another acute care hospital (12.0%) compared to Level II centers (4.0%, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Time to stabilization of unstable injured patients can be predicted with EMR data.</p>","PeriodicalId":21667,"journal":{"name":"SHOCK","volume":" ","pages":"644-649"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHOCK","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002420","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Background : This study sought to predict time to patient hemodynamic stabilization during trauma resuscitations of hypotensive patient encounters using electronic medical record (EMR) data. Methods: This observational cohort study leveraged EMR data from a nine-hospital academic system composed of Level I, Level II, and nontrauma centers. Injured, hemodynamically unstable (initial systolic blood pressure, <90 mm Hg) emergency encounters from 2015 to 2020 were identified. Stabilization was defined as documented subsequent systolic blood pressure of >90 mm Hg. We predicted time to stabilization testing random forests, gradient boosting, and ensembles using patient, injury, treatment, EPIC Trauma Narrator, and hospital features from the first 4 hours of care. Results: Of 177,127 encounters, 1,347 (0.8%) arrived hemodynamically unstable; 168 (12.5%) presented to Level I trauma centers, 853 (63.3%) to Level II, and 326 (24.2%) to nontrauma centers. Of those, 747 (55.5%) were stabilized with a median of 50 min (interquartile range, 21-101 min). Stabilization was documented in 94.6% of unstable patient encounters at Level I, 57.6% at Level II, and 29.8% at nontrauma centers ( P < 0.001). Time to stabilization was predicted with a C-index of 0.80. The most predictive features were EPIC Trauma Narrator measures, documented patient arrival, provider examination, and disposition decision. In-hospital mortality was highest at Level I, 3.0% vs. 1.2% at Level II, and 0.3% at nontrauma centers ( P < 0.001). Importantly, nontrauma centers had the highest retriage rate to another acute care hospital (12.0%) compared to Level II centers (4.0%, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Time to stabilization of unstable injured patients can be predicted with EMR data.

利用电子病历数据预测不稳定伤员的血流动力学稳定时间。
背景:本研究旨在利用电子医疗记录(EMR)数据预测低血压患者在外伤复苏过程中血液动力学稳定的时间:本研究试图利用电子病历(EMR)数据预测低血压患者在创伤复苏过程中患者血流动力学稳定的时间:这项观察性队列研究利用了由一级、二级和非创伤中心组成的九家医院学术系统的 EMR 数据。研究确定了 2015-2020 年期间受伤、血流动力学不稳定(初始收缩压小于 90 mmHg)的急诊病例。稳定被定义为有记录的后续收缩压大于 90 mmHg。我们利用患者、伤情、治疗、EPIC Trauma Narrator 和医院的前四小时护理特征,通过随机森林、梯度提升和集合测试来预测病情稳定的时间:在177127次就诊中,有1347人(0.8%)血液动力学不稳定;168人(12.5%)被送往一级创伤中心,853人(63.3%)被送往二级创伤中心,326人(24.2%)被送往非创伤中心。其中,747 人(55.5%)在 50 分钟(IQR 21-101 分钟)内病情稳定。在一级、二级和非创伤中心,分别有 94.6% 和 57.6% 的不稳定患者病情得到稳定(P < 0.001)。预测病情稳定时间的 C 指数为 0.80。最具预测性的特征是 EPIC Trauma Narrator 测量;记录患者到达、提供者检查和处置决定。一级中心的院内死亡率最高,为 3.0%,二级中心为 1.2%,非创伤中心为 0.3%(P < 0.001)。重要的是,与二级中心(4.0%,p < 0.001)相比,非创伤中心转往其他急症医院的比例最高(12.0%):结论:通过EMR数据可以预测不稳定伤员的病情稳定时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SHOCK
SHOCK 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
199
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: SHOCK®: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches includes studies of novel therapeutic approaches, such as immunomodulation, gene therapy, nutrition, and others. The mission of the Journal is to foster and promote multidisciplinary studies, both experimental and clinical in nature, that critically examine the etiology, mechanisms and novel therapeutics of shock-related pathophysiological conditions. Its purpose is to excel as a vehicle for timely publication in the areas of basic and clinical studies of shock, trauma, sepsis, inflammation, ischemia, and related pathobiological states, with particular emphasis on the biologic mechanisms that determine the response to such injury. Making such information available will ultimately facilitate improved care of the traumatized or septic individual.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信