Racial Disparities in Sports Cardiology: A Review.

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sheela Krishnan, James Sawalla Guseh, Merije Chukumerije, Aubrey J Grant, Peter N Dean, Jeffrey J Hsu, Mustafa Husaini, Dermot M Phelan, Ankit B Shah, Katie Stewart, Meagan M Wasfy, Quinn Capers, Utibe R Essien, Amber E Johnson, Benjamin D Levine, Jonathan H Kim
{"title":"Racial Disparities in Sports Cardiology: A Review.","authors":"Sheela Krishnan, James Sawalla Guseh, Merije Chukumerije, Aubrey J Grant, Peter N Dean, Jeffrey J Hsu, Mustafa Husaini, Dermot M Phelan, Ankit B Shah, Katie Stewart, Meagan M Wasfy, Quinn Capers, Utibe R Essien, Amber E Johnson, Benjamin D Levine, Jonathan H Kim","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.1899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Racial disparities in cardiovascular health, including sudden cardiac death (SCD), exist among both the general and athlete populations. Among competitive athletes, disparities in health outcomes potentially influenced by social determinants of health (SDOH) and structural racism remain inadequately understood. This narrative review centers on race in sports cardiology, addressing racial disparities in SCD risk, false-positive cardiac screening rates among athletes, and the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy, and encourages a reexamination of race-based practices in sports cardiology, such as the interpretation of screening 12-lead electrocardiogram findings.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>Drawing from an array of sources, including epidemiological data and broader medical literature, this narrative review discusses racial disparities in sports cardiology and calls for a paradigm shift in approach that encompasses 3 key principles: race-conscious awareness, clinical inclusivity, and research-driven refinement of clinical practice. These proposed principles call for a shift away from race-based assumptions towards individualized, health-focused care in sports cardiology. This shift would include fostering awareness of sociopolitical constructs, diversifying the medical team workforce, and conducting diverse, evidence-based research to better understand disparities and address inequities in sports cardiology care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In sports cardiology, inadequate consideration of the impact of structural racism and SDOH on racial disparities in health outcomes among athletes has resulted in potential biases in current normative standards and in the clinical approach to the cardiovascular care of athletes. An evidence-based approach to successfully address disparities requires pivoting from outdated race-based practices to a race-conscious framework to better understand and improve health care outcomes for diverse athletic populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"935-943"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2024.1899","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Racial disparities in cardiovascular health, including sudden cardiac death (SCD), exist among both the general and athlete populations. Among competitive athletes, disparities in health outcomes potentially influenced by social determinants of health (SDOH) and structural racism remain inadequately understood. This narrative review centers on race in sports cardiology, addressing racial disparities in SCD risk, false-positive cardiac screening rates among athletes, and the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy, and encourages a reexamination of race-based practices in sports cardiology, such as the interpretation of screening 12-lead electrocardiogram findings.

Observations: Drawing from an array of sources, including epidemiological data and broader medical literature, this narrative review discusses racial disparities in sports cardiology and calls for a paradigm shift in approach that encompasses 3 key principles: race-conscious awareness, clinical inclusivity, and research-driven refinement of clinical practice. These proposed principles call for a shift away from race-based assumptions towards individualized, health-focused care in sports cardiology. This shift would include fostering awareness of sociopolitical constructs, diversifying the medical team workforce, and conducting diverse, evidence-based research to better understand disparities and address inequities in sports cardiology care.

Conclusions and relevance: In sports cardiology, inadequate consideration of the impact of structural racism and SDOH on racial disparities in health outcomes among athletes has resulted in potential biases in current normative standards and in the clinical approach to the cardiovascular care of athletes. An evidence-based approach to successfully address disparities requires pivoting from outdated race-based practices to a race-conscious framework to better understand and improve health care outcomes for diverse athletic populations.

运动心脏病学中的种族差异:回顾。
重要性:在普通人群和运动员人群中,心血管健康(包括心脏性猝死 (SCD))方面存在着种族差异。在竞技运动员中,可能受健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)和结构性种族主义影响的健康结果差异仍未得到充分了解。这篇叙述性综述以运动心脏病学中的种族问题为中心,探讨了 SCD 风险、运动员心脏筛查假阳性率和左心室肥大患病率中的种族差异,并鼓励重新审视运动心脏病学中基于种族的做法,如对筛查 12 导联心电图结果的解释:这篇叙述性综述从流行病学数据和更广泛的医学文献等一系列资料中汲取素材,讨论了运动心脏病学中的种族差异,并呼吁转变方法范式,其中包括三个关键原则:种族意识、临床包容性和以研究为导向的临床实践改进。这些建议的原则要求运动心脏病学从基于种族的假设转向个性化、以健康为重点的护理。这种转变将包括促进对社会政治结构的认识,使医疗团队的工作人员多样化,以及开展多样化的循证研究,以更好地了解差异并解决运动心脏病学护理中的不公平问题:在运动心脏病学领域,结构性种族主义和可持续发展的健康与卫生对运动员健康结果中的种族差异的影响考虑不足,导致当前的规范标准和运动员心血管护理的临床方法可能存在偏差。要采用循证方法成功解决差异问题,就必须从过时的基于种族的做法转向具有种族意识的框架,以更好地了解和改善不同运动员群体的医疗保健结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA cardiology
JAMA cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
45.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
264
期刊介绍: JAMA Cardiology, an international peer-reviewed journal, serves as the premier publication for clinical investigators, clinicians, and trainees in cardiovascular medicine worldwide. As a member of the JAMA Network, it aligns with a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications. Published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues annually, JAMA Cardiology attracts over 4.3 million annual article views and downloads. Research articles become freely accessible online 12 months post-publication without any author fees. Moreover, the online version is readily accessible to institutions in developing countries through the World Health Organization's HINARI program. Positioned at the intersection of clinical investigation, actionable clinical science, and clinical practice, JAMA Cardiology prioritizes traditional and evolving cardiovascular medicine, alongside evidence-based health policy. It places particular emphasis on health equity, especially when grounded in original science, as a top editorial priority.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信