Bowel Perforation Caused by Biliary Stent Migration After ERCP: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Natalie Wilson, Chukwunonso Ezeani, Abdellatif Ismail, Monzer Abdalla, Shaikhoon Mohammed, Abubaker Abdalla, Ayman Elawad, Azizullah Beran, Fouad Jaber, Hazem Abosheaishaa, Erica Loon, Mohamed Abdallah, John Vargo, Mohammad Bilal, Prabhleen Chahal
{"title":"Bowel Perforation Caused by Biliary Stent Migration After ERCP: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Natalie Wilson, Chukwunonso Ezeani, Abdellatif Ismail, Monzer Abdalla, Shaikhoon Mohammed, Abubaker Abdalla, Ayman Elawad, Azizullah Beran, Fouad Jaber, Hazem Abosheaishaa, Erica Loon, Mohamed Abdallah, John Vargo, Mohammad Bilal, Prabhleen Chahal","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goals: </strong>This systematic review aims to evaluate the risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes of bowel perforation caused by stent migration after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal migration of biliary stents can occur after ERCP. Upon migration, most stents pass through the intestine without adverse events; however, bowel perforation has been reported.</p><p><strong>Study: </strong>A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was conducted through October 2023 for articles that reported bowel perforation because of stent migration. Cases of incomplete stent migration and proximal stent migration were excluded. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines to identify full-length articles in English reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2041 articles retrieved on the initial search, 92 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 132 cases of bowel perforation occurred due to stent migration after ERCP (56.1% female; average age: 66 y). The median time from initial ERCP to perforation was 44.5 days (IQR 12.5-125.5). Most cases of perforation occurred in the small bowel (64.4%) compared with the colon (34.8%). Stents were mostly plastic (87.1%) with a median diameter of 10 Fr (IQR 8.5-10) and median length of 10.3 cm (IQR 715). Surgical management was pursued in 52.3% and endoscopic management in 42.4%. Bowel resection was required for 25.8% of patients. The overall mortality rate was 17.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, this study demonstrates that bowel perforation after ERCP stent migration primarily occurs within 44.5 days and most frequently with a 10 Fr plastic biliary stent. The overall mortality rate was 17.4%. It is important for endoscopists to be mindful of this rare but serious adverse event.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goals: This systematic review aims to evaluate the risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes of bowel perforation caused by stent migration after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Background: Distal migration of biliary stents can occur after ERCP. Upon migration, most stents pass through the intestine without adverse events; however, bowel perforation has been reported.

Study: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was conducted through October 2023 for articles that reported bowel perforation because of stent migration. Cases of incomplete stent migration and proximal stent migration were excluded. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines to identify full-length articles in English reporting.

Results: Of 2041 articles retrieved on the initial search, 92 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 132 cases of bowel perforation occurred due to stent migration after ERCP (56.1% female; average age: 66 y). The median time from initial ERCP to perforation was 44.5 days (IQR 12.5-125.5). Most cases of perforation occurred in the small bowel (64.4%) compared with the colon (34.8%). Stents were mostly plastic (87.1%) with a median diameter of 10 Fr (IQR 8.5-10) and median length of 10.3 cm (IQR 715). Surgical management was pursued in 52.3% and endoscopic management in 42.4%. Bowel resection was required for 25.8% of patients. The overall mortality rate was 17.4%.

Conclusion: In summary, this study demonstrates that bowel perforation after ERCP stent migration primarily occurs within 44.5 days and most frequently with a 10 Fr plastic biliary stent. The overall mortality rate was 17.4%. It is important for endoscopists to be mindful of this rare but serious adverse event.

ERCP术后胆道支架移位导致的肠穿孔:系统性综述。
目标:本系统综述旨在评估内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后支架移位导致肠穿孔的风险因素、临床特征和结果:本系统综述旨在评估内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后支架移位导致肠穿孔的风险因素、临床特征和预后:背景:ERCP术后可能发生胆道支架远端移位。研究:研究:在 2023 年 10 月之前,我们对 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了全面的文献检索,以寻找报道支架移位导致肠穿孔的文章。不包括支架不完全移位和近端支架移位的病例。我们遵循《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南,确定了以英文报告的长篇文章:结果:在最初检索到的 2041 篇文章中,有 92 篇符合纳入标准。ERCP术后因支架移位导致肠穿孔的病例共有132例(女性占56.1%;平均年龄66岁)。从初次ERCP到穿孔的中位时间为44.5天(IQR 12.5-125.5)。大多数穿孔发生在小肠(64.4%),而结肠(34.8%)。支架多为塑料(87.1%),中位直径为 10 Fr(IQR 8.5-10),中位长度为 10.3 cm(IQR 715)。52.3%的患者接受了手术治疗,42.4%的患者接受了内窥镜治疗。25.8%的患者需要切除肠道。总死亡率为 17.4%:总之,这项研究表明,ERCP支架移位后肠穿孔主要发生在44.5天内,最常见的是10 Fr塑料胆道支架。总死亡率为 17.4%。内镜医师必须注意这种罕见但严重的不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信