The Effects of Induction Chemotherapy in the Management of Ultra High-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia.

Q4 Medicine
Acta Medica Philippina Pub Date : 2024-06-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47895/amp.v58i11.9127
Agnes L Soriano-Estrella, Koleen C Pasamba
{"title":"The Effects of Induction Chemotherapy in the Management of Ultra High-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia.","authors":"Agnes L Soriano-Estrella, Koleen C Pasamba","doi":"10.47895/amp.v58i11.9127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of ultra high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) patients managed with and without induction chemotherapy in the Division of Trophoblastic Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philippine General Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical and demographic data were collected retrospectively from ultra high-risk GTN patients admitted in the Division of Trophoblastic Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philippine General Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021. Rate of remission and early death of those who received induction chemotherapy were compared to those who did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 patients with ultra high-risk GTN were included in the study, nine of whom underwent induction chemotherapy while 12 had no induction chemotherapy and was given the standard EMACO regimen. There was no significant difference in the rate of early death as well as the rate and time to achieve remission between those who received induction chemotherapy compared to those who were immediately started on EMACO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A firm conclusion cannot be drawn from the results considering the small population included in the study. Further studies with larger sample size and prospective study design are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":6994,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Philippina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11239983/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Philippina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.v58i11.9127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of ultra high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) patients managed with and without induction chemotherapy in the Division of Trophoblastic Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philippine General Hospital.

Methods: Clinical and demographic data were collected retrospectively from ultra high-risk GTN patients admitted in the Division of Trophoblastic Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philippine General Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021. Rate of remission and early death of those who received induction chemotherapy were compared to those who did not.

Results: A total of 21 patients with ultra high-risk GTN were included in the study, nine of whom underwent induction chemotherapy while 12 had no induction chemotherapy and was given the standard EMACO regimen. There was no significant difference in the rate of early death as well as the rate and time to achieve remission between those who received induction chemotherapy compared to those who were immediately started on EMACO.

Conclusion: A firm conclusion cannot be drawn from the results considering the small population included in the study. Further studies with larger sample size and prospective study design are recommended.

诱导化疗在治疗超高危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤中的效果。
研究目的本研究旨在确定菲律宾综合医院妇产科滋养细胞疾病部接受或未接受诱导化疗的超高危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN)患者的临床疗效:方法:对菲律宾总医院妇产科滋养细胞疾病科2015年1月至2021年12月收治的超高危GTN患者的临床和人口统计学数据进行回顾性收集。对接受诱导化疗与未接受诱导化疗的患者的缓解率和早期死亡率进行了比较:研究共纳入21名超高危GTN患者,其中9人接受了诱导化疗,12人未接受诱导化疗,接受了标准EMACO方案。与立即开始接受 EMACO 治疗的患者相比,接受诱导化疗的患者的早期死亡率以及获得缓解的比率和时间均无明显差异:考虑到研究对象较少,因此无法从研究结果中得出明确结论。建议进一步开展样本量更大、采用前瞻性研究设计的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medica Philippina
Acta Medica Philippina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信