Variables of performance governance model development: evidence from the Italian public healthcare

IF 2.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Fabio De Matteis, Elio Borgonovi
{"title":"Variables of performance governance model development: evidence from the Italian public healthcare","authors":"Fabio De Matteis, Elio Borgonovi","doi":"10.1108/ijpsm-12-2023-0354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The performance governance model, based on the use of performance information to improve governance, is particularly complex, considering the inter-institutional relationships and community involvement that it requires. In order to contribute to the scientific debate on this model, the paper aims to highlight what are the challenges in developing three variables of performance governance (operational performance measurement tools, governance integration and citizen involvement) in the public health context.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Based on the previous literature, we identified three variables that characterize the performance governance model. We then explored them through the case study methodology applied to the Apulia Regional Health System.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The analysis allows us to conclude that the healthcare system under consideration is still far from applying the performance governance model, but it highlights some factors that are preparatory to the same. Moreover, starting from the empirical evidence, some considerations arise regarding managerial and policy making implications for the variables investigated.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The paper contributes to a growing body of critical literature on performance governance contextualizing the analysis in a particularly relevant area of the public sector, namely public health. Furthermore, the research also identifies some potential risks of the performance governance model (rigidity in performance measurement tool, organization-objective-responsibility relationship, participatory illusion).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47437,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Sector Management","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Sector Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-12-2023-0354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The performance governance model, based on the use of performance information to improve governance, is particularly complex, considering the inter-institutional relationships and community involvement that it requires. In order to contribute to the scientific debate on this model, the paper aims to highlight what are the challenges in developing three variables of performance governance (operational performance measurement tools, governance integration and citizen involvement) in the public health context.

Design/methodology/approach

Based on the previous literature, we identified three variables that characterize the performance governance model. We then explored them through the case study methodology applied to the Apulia Regional Health System.

Findings

The analysis allows us to conclude that the healthcare system under consideration is still far from applying the performance governance model, but it highlights some factors that are preparatory to the same. Moreover, starting from the empirical evidence, some considerations arise regarding managerial and policy making implications for the variables investigated.

Originality/value

The paper contributes to a growing body of critical literature on performance governance contextualizing the analysis in a particularly relevant area of the public sector, namely public health. Furthermore, the research also identifies some potential risks of the performance governance model (rigidity in performance measurement tool, organization-objective-responsibility relationship, participatory illusion).

绩效管理模式发展的变量:来自意大利公共医疗保健的证据
目的 绩效治理模式以利用绩效信息改善治理为基础,考虑到其所需的机构间关系和社区参 与,该模式尤为复杂。为了促进对这一模式的科学讨论,本文旨在强调在公共卫生背景下开发绩效治理的三个变量(业务绩效衡量工具、治理整合和公民参与)所面临的挑战。结果通过分析,我们得出结论,我们所考虑的医疗保健系统离采用绩效管理模式还很远,但它强调了一些准备采用绩效管理模式的因素。此外,从经验证据出发,我们还对所调查变量的管理和决策影响进行了一些思考。此外,研究还发现了绩效治理模式的一些潜在风险(绩效衡量工具的僵化、组织-目标-责任关系、参与性幻觉)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Public Sector Management (IJPSM) publishes academic articles on the management, governance, and reform of public sector organizations around the world, aiming to provide an accessible and valuable resource for academics and public managers alike. IJPSM covers the full range of public management research including studies of organizations, public finances, performance management, Human Resources Management, strategy, leadership, accountability, integrity, collaboration, e-government, procurement, and more. IJPSM encourages scholars to publish their empirical research and is particularly interested in comparative findings. IJPSM is open to articles using a variety of research methods and theoretical approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信