Balancing Participation and Decentralization in Proof-of-Stake Cryptocurrencies

Aggelos Kiayias, Elias Koutsoupias, Francisco Marmolejo-Cossio, Aikaterini-Panagiota Stouka
{"title":"Balancing Participation and Decentralization in Proof-of-Stake Cryptocurrencies","authors":"Aggelos Kiayias, Elias Koutsoupias, Francisco Marmolejo-Cossio, Aikaterini-Panagiota Stouka","doi":"arxiv-2407.08686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proof-of-stake blockchain protocols have emerged as a compelling paradigm for\norganizing distributed ledger systems. In proof-of-stake (PoS), a subset of\nstakeholders participate in validating a growing ledger of transactions. For\nthe safety and liveness of the underlying system, it is desirable for the set\nof validators to include multiple independent entities as well as represent a\nnon-negligible percentage of the total stake issued. In this paper, we study a\nsecondary form of participation in the transaction validation process, which\ntakes the form of stake delegation, whereby an agent delegates their stake to\nan active validator who acts as a stake pool operator. We study payment schemes\nthat reward agents as a function of their collective actions regarding stake\npool operation and delegation. Such payment schemes serve as a mechanism to\nincentivize participation in the validation process while maintaining\ndecentralization. We observe natural trade-offs between these objectives and\nthe total expenditure required to run the relevant payment schemes. Ultimately,\nwe provide a family of payment schemes which can strike different balances\nbetween these competing objectives at equilibrium in a Bayesian game theoretic\nframework.","PeriodicalId":501316,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.08686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proof-of-stake blockchain protocols have emerged as a compelling paradigm for organizing distributed ledger systems. In proof-of-stake (PoS), a subset of stakeholders participate in validating a growing ledger of transactions. For the safety and liveness of the underlying system, it is desirable for the set of validators to include multiple independent entities as well as represent a non-negligible percentage of the total stake issued. In this paper, we study a secondary form of participation in the transaction validation process, which takes the form of stake delegation, whereby an agent delegates their stake to an active validator who acts as a stake pool operator. We study payment schemes that reward agents as a function of their collective actions regarding stake pool operation and delegation. Such payment schemes serve as a mechanism to incentivize participation in the validation process while maintaining decentralization. We observe natural trade-offs between these objectives and the total expenditure required to run the relevant payment schemes. Ultimately, we provide a family of payment schemes which can strike different balances between these competing objectives at equilibrium in a Bayesian game theoretic framework.
在 "预约证明 "加密货币中平衡参与性和去中心化
股权证明区块链协议已成为组织分布式账本系统的一个引人注目的范例。在权益证明(PoS)中,一部分利益相关者参与验证不断增长的交易分类账。为了保证底层系统的安全性和有效性,验证者的集合最好包括多个独立实体,并且在发行的总赌注中占不可忽略的比例。在本文中,我们研究了参与交易验证过程的第二种形式,即赌注委托,代理将其赌注委托给作为赌注池操作员的活跃验证者。我们研究的支付方案是根据代理在股权池运营和委托方面的集体行动对其进行奖励。这种支付方案既是一种激励参与验证过程的机制,又能保持去中心化。我们观察到了这些目标与运行相关支付方案所需总支出之间的自然权衡。最终,我们在贝叶斯博弈论框架下提供了一系列支付方案,这些方案可以在均衡状态下在这些相互竞争的目标之间取得不同的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信