{"title":"What makes a convivial community tool? Investigating grassroots ecological restoration","authors":"Tim Alamenciak, Stephen D. Murphy","doi":"10.5751/es-15258-290303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The practice of ecological restoration through native plant gardening is emerging among community groups as a means of addressing degradation in urban landscapes. Despite this trend, restoration remains primarily studied as a professional practice. Grassroots associations support people in growing native plants, but within the research on restoration ecology, there remains little study of how non-professionals engage in the practice. We adapt and expand Ivan Illich’s concept of a convivial community tool (i.e., a tool that is open and accessible rather than restricted to certain users) to ecological restoration through a case study of the Ottawa Wildflower Seed Library. Participants highlighted two main strategies of the seed library: overcoming barriers and supporting emergent practices. The seed library helped people overcome the barriers of plant availability, cost, and knowledge, while supporting spontaneous initiatives from volunteers to further the mission of the seed library. We argue that these two strategies operationalize the idea of a convivial community tool. This research contributes an understanding of one way that ecological restoration can broaden its appeal by empowering non-professionals to engage in restoration and provides a starting point for a novel organizational framework based on Illich’s ideas.</p>\n<p>The post What makes a convivial community tool? Investigating grassroots ecological restoration first appeared on Ecology & Society.</p>","PeriodicalId":51028,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5751/es-15258-290303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The practice of ecological restoration through native plant gardening is emerging among community groups as a means of addressing degradation in urban landscapes. Despite this trend, restoration remains primarily studied as a professional practice. Grassroots associations support people in growing native plants, but within the research on restoration ecology, there remains little study of how non-professionals engage in the practice. We adapt and expand Ivan Illich’s concept of a convivial community tool (i.e., a tool that is open and accessible rather than restricted to certain users) to ecological restoration through a case study of the Ottawa Wildflower Seed Library. Participants highlighted two main strategies of the seed library: overcoming barriers and supporting emergent practices. The seed library helped people overcome the barriers of plant availability, cost, and knowledge, while supporting spontaneous initiatives from volunteers to further the mission of the seed library. We argue that these two strategies operationalize the idea of a convivial community tool. This research contributes an understanding of one way that ecological restoration can broaden its appeal by empowering non-professionals to engage in restoration and provides a starting point for a novel organizational framework based on Illich’s ideas.
The post What makes a convivial community tool? Investigating grassroots ecological restoration first appeared on Ecology & Society.
期刊介绍：
Ecology and Society is an electronic, peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary journal devoted to the rapid dissemination of current research. Manuscript submission, peer review, and publication are all handled on the Internet. Software developed for the journal automates all clerical steps during peer review, facilitates a double-blind peer review process, and allows authors and editors to follow the progress of peer review on the Internet. As articles are accepted, they are published in an "Issue in Progress." At four month intervals the Issue-in-Progress is declared a New Issue, and subscribers receive the Table of Contents of the issue via email. Our turn-around time (submission to publication) averages around 350 days.
We encourage publication of special features. Special features are comprised of a set of manuscripts that address a single theme, and include an introductory and summary manuscript. The individual contributions are published in regular issues, and the special feature manuscripts are linked through a table of contents and announced on the journal''s main page.
The journal seeks papers that are novel, integrative and written in a way that is accessible to a wide audience that includes an array of disciplines from the natural sciences, social sciences, and the humanities concerned with the relationship between society and the life-supporting ecosystems on which human wellbeing ultimately depends.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
