Data-driven prioritization strategies for inventory rebalancing in bike-sharing systems

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Maria Clara Martins Silva , Daniel Aloise , Sanjay Dominik Jena
{"title":"Data-driven prioritization strategies for inventory rebalancing in bike-sharing systems","authors":"Maria Clara Martins Silva ,&nbsp;Daniel Aloise ,&nbsp;Sanjay Dominik Jena","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The popularity of bike-sharing systems has constantly increased throughout the recent years. Most of such success can be attributed to their multiple benefits, such as user convenience, low usage costs, health benefits and their contribution to environmental relief. However, satisfying all user demands remains a challenge, given that the inventories of bike-sharing stations tend to be unbalanced over time. Bike-sharing system operators must therefore intervene to rebalance station inventories to provide both available bikes and empty docks to the commuters. Due to limited rebalancing resources, the number of stations to be rebalanced often exceeds the system’s rebalancing capacity, especially close to peak hours. As a consequence, operators are forced to manually select a subset of stations that should be prioritized for rebalancing. While most of the literature has concentrated either on predicting optimal station inventories or on the rebalancing itself, the identification of critical stations that should be prioritized for rebalancing has received little attention. Given the importance of this step in current operating practices, we propose three strategies to select the stations that should be prioritized for rebalancing, using features such as the predicted trip demand and the inventory levels at the stations themselves. Two sets of computational experiments aim at evaluating the performance of the proposed prioritization strategies on real-world data from Montreal’s bike-sharing system operator. The first set of experiments focuses on both the 2019 and 2020 seasons, each of which exhibits distinct travel patterns given the restrictive measures implemented in 2020 to prevent the spread of COVID-19. One of these strategies significantly improves by reducing the estimated lost demand by up to 65%, while another strategy reduces the estimated number of required rebalancing operations by up to 33% when compared to the prioritization scheme currently in use at the considered bike-sharing system. The second set of experiments evaluates the performance of the proposed strategies when rebalancing decisions are optimized in a rolling horizon planning. The results highlight various benefits of the proposed strategies, which are efficiently solved as transportation problems and improve lost demand over two intuitive baselines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 103141"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001075/pdfft?md5=0b95a4e092ee73a47e213c647ac4016c&pid=1-s2.0-S0305048324001075-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The popularity of bike-sharing systems has constantly increased throughout the recent years. Most of such success can be attributed to their multiple benefits, such as user convenience, low usage costs, health benefits and their contribution to environmental relief. However, satisfying all user demands remains a challenge, given that the inventories of bike-sharing stations tend to be unbalanced over time. Bike-sharing system operators must therefore intervene to rebalance station inventories to provide both available bikes and empty docks to the commuters. Due to limited rebalancing resources, the number of stations to be rebalanced often exceeds the system’s rebalancing capacity, especially close to peak hours. As a consequence, operators are forced to manually select a subset of stations that should be prioritized for rebalancing. While most of the literature has concentrated either on predicting optimal station inventories or on the rebalancing itself, the identification of critical stations that should be prioritized for rebalancing has received little attention. Given the importance of this step in current operating practices, we propose three strategies to select the stations that should be prioritized for rebalancing, using features such as the predicted trip demand and the inventory levels at the stations themselves. Two sets of computational experiments aim at evaluating the performance of the proposed prioritization strategies on real-world data from Montreal’s bike-sharing system operator. The first set of experiments focuses on both the 2019 and 2020 seasons, each of which exhibits distinct travel patterns given the restrictive measures implemented in 2020 to prevent the spread of COVID-19. One of these strategies significantly improves by reducing the estimated lost demand by up to 65%, while another strategy reduces the estimated number of required rebalancing operations by up to 33% when compared to the prioritization scheme currently in use at the considered bike-sharing system. The second set of experiments evaluates the performance of the proposed strategies when rebalancing decisions are optimized in a rolling horizon planning. The results highlight various benefits of the proposed strategies, which are efficiently solved as transportation problems and improve lost demand over two intuitive baselines.

共享单车系统库存再平衡的数据驱动优先排序策略
近年来,共享单车系统越来越受欢迎。这种成功主要归功于其多重优势,如方便用户、使用成本低、有益健康以及有助于缓解环境问题。然而,要满足所有用户的需求仍然是一个挑战,因为随着时间的推移,共享单车站点的库存往往是不平衡的。因此,共享单车系统运营商必须采取干预措施,重新平衡站点库存,为通勤者提供可用的单车和空车位。由于重新平衡资源有限,需要重新平衡的站点数量往往超过系统的重新平衡能力,特别是在接近高峰时段。因此,运营商不得不手动选择优先进行再平衡的车站子集。虽然大部分文献都集中在预测最佳车站库存或再平衡本身,但确定应优先进行再平衡的关键车站却很少受到关注。鉴于这一步骤在当前运营实践中的重要性,我们提出了三种策略,利用预测的出车需求和车站本身的库存水平等特征来选择应优先进行再平衡的车站。我们进行了两组计算实验,目的是在蒙特利尔共享单车系统运营商提供的真实数据上评估所提出的优先策略的性能。第一组实验侧重于 2019 年和 2020 年两季,由于 2020 年实施了防止 COVID-19 传播的限制性措施,这两季的出行模式各不相同。与考虑的共享单车系统目前使用的优先级排序方案相比,其中一种策略大大提高了效率,估计损失的需求量最多减少了 65%,而另一种策略则将所需的重新平衡操作估计次数最多减少了 33%。第二组实验评估了在滚动范围规划中优化再平衡决策时所建议策略的性能。结果凸显了所提策略的各种优势,这些策略作为交通问题得到了有效解决,与两个直观的基线相比,改善了需求损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信