Prophylactic antibiotics in sialendoscopy: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba, Alvaro Sanchez-Barrueco, Giovanni Cammaroto, Jerome R Lechien, Miguel Mayo-Yanez, Carlos Cenjor, Pasquale Capaccio, Carlos Saga-Gutierrez
{"title":"Prophylactic antibiotics in sialendoscopy: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba, Alvaro Sanchez-Barrueco, Giovanni Cammaroto, Jerome R Lechien, Miguel Mayo-Yanez, Carlos Cenjor, Pasquale Capaccio, Carlos Saga-Gutierrez","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08773-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Antibiotics have been prescribed routinely in sialendoscopy procedures to reduce the risk of postoperative infection, despite the limited evidence supporting this practice. Being necessary to assess the need for antibiotics in Sialendoscopy, aiming to provide evidence-based guidance to clinicians regarding antibiotic administration in this procedure.</p><p><strong>Materials & method: </strong>A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the of prophylactic antibiotics in Sialendoscopy was designed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 80 patients were included in this study, including 57 females (71.8%) and 23 males (28.8%). In terms of prophylaxis, 36 patients (45%) received prophylactic treatment, and 44 patients (55%) did not. The occurrence of infectious events was observed in 2 patients (5.6%) with prophylaxis and 4 patients (9.1%) without prophylaxis. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.556).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, our prospective, randomized clinical trial aimed to address the debate regarding the use of prophylactic antibiotics in sialendoscopy. Our study's findings suggest that the routine use antibiotics may not be necessary to prevent postoperative infections in sialendoscopy procedures. These results have important implications for clinical practice, potentially reducing the unnecessary use of antibiotics and addressing concerns related to antibiotic resistance and adverse drug reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08773-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Antibiotics have been prescribed routinely in sialendoscopy procedures to reduce the risk of postoperative infection, despite the limited evidence supporting this practice. Being necessary to assess the need for antibiotics in Sialendoscopy, aiming to provide evidence-based guidance to clinicians regarding antibiotic administration in this procedure.

Materials & method: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the of prophylactic antibiotics in Sialendoscopy was designed.

Results: A total of 80 patients were included in this study, including 57 females (71.8%) and 23 males (28.8%). In terms of prophylaxis, 36 patients (45%) received prophylactic treatment, and 44 patients (55%) did not. The occurrence of infectious events was observed in 2 patients (5.6%) with prophylaxis and 4 patients (9.1%) without prophylaxis. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.556).

Conclusion: In conclusion, our prospective, randomized clinical trial aimed to address the debate regarding the use of prophylactic antibiotics in sialendoscopy. Our study's findings suggest that the routine use antibiotics may not be necessary to prevent postoperative infections in sialendoscopy procedures. These results have important implications for clinical practice, potentially reducing the unnecessary use of antibiotics and addressing concerns related to antibiotic resistance and adverse drug reactions.

Abstract Image

鞘内镜检查中的预防性抗生素:随机临床试验。
目的:尽管支持这种做法的证据有限,但在虹膜内窥镜手术中常规使用抗生素以降低术后感染的风险。因此,有必要评估咽内镜手术中使用抗生素的必要性,旨在为临床医生在该手术中使用抗生素提供循证指导:设计了一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照临床试验,以评估在虹膜内窥镜检查中预防性使用抗生素的情况:本研究共纳入 80 名患者,包括 57 名女性(71.8%)和 23 名男性(28.8%)。在预防性治疗方面,36 名患者(45%)接受了预防性治疗,44 名患者(55%)未接受预防性治疗。有 2 名患者(5.6%)接受了预防性治疗,4 名患者(9.1%)没有接受预防性治疗。然而,这一差异并无统计学意义(P = 0.556):总之,我们的前瞻性随机临床试验旨在解决有关在鞘内镜检查中使用预防性抗生素的争论。我们的研究结果表明,常规使用抗生素可能并不是预防腕内镜手术术后感染所必需的。这些结果对临床实践具有重要意义,有可能减少不必要的抗生素使用,并解决与抗生素耐药性和药物不良反应相关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信