The use of high expansion foam for stunning and killing pigs and poultry

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Elisabetta Canali, Julian Ashley Drewe, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas, Christian Gortázar, Mette S. Herskin, Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca, Barbara Padalino, Helen Clare Roberts, Hans Spoolder, Karl Stahl, Antonio Velarde, Christoph Winckler, Arvo Viltrop, Jessica Martin, Mohan Raj, Alexei Vyssotski, Yves Van der Stede, Marika Vitali, Aikaterini Manakidou, Virginie Michel
{"title":"The use of high expansion foam for stunning and killing pigs and poultry","authors":"EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW),&nbsp;Søren Saxmose Nielsen,&nbsp;Julio Alvarez,&nbsp;Dominique Joseph Bicout,&nbsp;Paolo Calistri,&nbsp;Elisabetta Canali,&nbsp;Julian Ashley Drewe,&nbsp;Bruno Garin-Bastuji,&nbsp;Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas,&nbsp;Christian Gortázar,&nbsp;Mette S. Herskin,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca,&nbsp;Barbara Padalino,&nbsp;Helen Clare Roberts,&nbsp;Hans Spoolder,&nbsp;Karl Stahl,&nbsp;Antonio Velarde,&nbsp;Christoph Winckler,&nbsp;Arvo Viltrop,&nbsp;Jessica Martin,&nbsp;Mohan Raj,&nbsp;Alexei Vyssotski,&nbsp;Yves Van der Stede,&nbsp;Marika Vitali,&nbsp;Aikaterini Manakidou,&nbsp;Virginie Michel","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the use of high-expansion foam for stunning and killing pigs and poultry. A dossier was provided by the applicant as the basis for an assessment of the extent to which the method is able to provide a level of animal welfare at least equivalent to that ensured by the currently allowed methods for pigs and poultry. According to legislation, to be approved in the EU, new stunning methods must ensure (1) the absence of pain, distress or suffering until the onset of unconsciousness, and (2) that the animal remains unconscious until death. An ad hoc Working Group set up by EFSA performed the assessment as follows: (1) The data provided were checked against the criteria laid down in the EFSA Guidance (EFSA, 2018), and was found to partially fulfil those criteria; (2) extensive literature search; (3) data extraction for quantitative assessment; (4) qualitative exercise based on non-formal expert elicitation. The assessment led to conclude that it is more likely than not (certainty &gt; 50%–100%) that high-expansion foam for stunning and killing pigs and poultry, named NEFS in container (Nitrogen Expansion Foam Stunning in container), provides a level of welfare at least equivalent to one or more of the currently allowed methods listed in Annex I of Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009. The overall assessment of EFSA is valid only under the technical conditions described in this Opinion for laying hens, broiler chickens of all age and pigs weighing 15–41 kg in situations other than slaughter. The overall assessment of EFSA is that NEFS can be suitable for depopulation using containers for pig and poultry farms respecting the technical conditions and the categories and types of animals defined in this Scientific Opinion.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8855","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8855","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the use of high-expansion foam for stunning and killing pigs and poultry. A dossier was provided by the applicant as the basis for an assessment of the extent to which the method is able to provide a level of animal welfare at least equivalent to that ensured by the currently allowed methods for pigs and poultry. According to legislation, to be approved in the EU, new stunning methods must ensure (1) the absence of pain, distress or suffering until the onset of unconsciousness, and (2) that the animal remains unconscious until death. An ad hoc Working Group set up by EFSA performed the assessment as follows: (1) The data provided were checked against the criteria laid down in the EFSA Guidance (EFSA, 2018), and was found to partially fulfil those criteria; (2) extensive literature search; (3) data extraction for quantitative assessment; (4) qualitative exercise based on non-formal expert elicitation. The assessment led to conclude that it is more likely than not (certainty > 50%–100%) that high-expansion foam for stunning and killing pigs and poultry, named NEFS in container (Nitrogen Expansion Foam Stunning in container), provides a level of welfare at least equivalent to one or more of the currently allowed methods listed in Annex I of Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009. The overall assessment of EFSA is valid only under the technical conditions described in this Opinion for laying hens, broiler chickens of all age and pigs weighing 15–41 kg in situations other than slaughter. The overall assessment of EFSA is that NEFS can be suitable for depopulation using containers for pig and poultry farms respecting the technical conditions and the categories and types of animals defined in this Scientific Opinion.

Abstract Image

使用高膨胀泡沫震晕和杀死猪和家禽
欧洲食品安全局动物健康与福利专家小组(AHAW)被要求就使用高膨胀泡沫电击和杀死猪和家禽提出科学意见。申请人提供了一份档案,作为评估该方法在多大程度上能够提供至少等同于目前允许的猪和家禽方法所确保的动物福利水平的依据。根据法律规定,新的电击方法要在欧盟获得批准,必须确保(1)在动物失去知觉之前没有疼痛、痛苦或折磨,以及(2)动物在死亡之前一直保持无知觉状态。欧洲食品安全局成立的特设工作组进行了如下评估:(1) 根据欧洲食品安全局指南(欧洲食品安全局,2018 年)中规定的标准检查所提供的数据,发现部分符合这些标准;(2) 广泛的文献检索;(3) 用于定量评估的数据提取;(4) 基于非正式专家征询的定性工作。评估得出的结论是,用于电击和杀死猪和家禽的高膨胀泡沫(名为 "容器中的氮膨胀泡沫电击")提供的福利水平至少相当于理事会条例(EC)第 1099/2009 号附件 I 中列出的一种或多种当前允许的方法,这种可能性大于非可能性(确定性为 50%-100%)。欧洲食物安全局的总体评估仅在本意见所述的技术条件下有效,适用于非屠宰情况下的蛋鸡、各年龄段肉鸡和体重 15-41 公斤的猪。欧洲食品安全局的总体评估认为,在遵守本科学意见中规定的技术条件和动物类别及类型的情况下,NEFS 适用于猪场和家禽场使用容器进行去势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信