Machine learning models for classifying coffee fruits detachment force

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Mariana D. Meneses, Vinicius dos Santos Carreira, Bruno Rafael de Almeida Moreira, Welington Gonzaga do Vale, Glauco de Souza Rolim, Rouverson Pereira da Silva
{"title":"Machine learning models for classifying coffee fruits detachment force","authors":"Mariana D. Meneses,&nbsp;Vinicius dos Santos Carreira,&nbsp;Bruno Rafael de Almeida Moreira,&nbsp;Welington Gonzaga do Vale,&nbsp;Glauco de Souza Rolim,&nbsp;Rouverson Pereira da Silva","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The maturation process of coffee (<i>Coffea arabica</i>) trees exhibits inherent variability, producing fruits at various physiological maturity stages. This variability affects the resistance between the fruit and its peduncle, posing a challenge in mechanized harvesting: non-selective harvesting. A precise classification of coffee fruit detachment force is essential to address this challenge, ensuring coffee's quality and producer's profitability. This study assesses the efficacy of machine learning (ML) models in determining the detachment force across various coffee cultivars under drip-irrigated and rainfed conditions. The dataset included detachment force measurements from 24 cultivars—13 drip-irrigated and 11 rainfed—yielding 1152 data points. Variance analysis compared irrigation methods and three maturity stages: green, cherry, and dry. Detachment force was categorized into four classes based on the dataset's quartile distribution. The ML models utilized were random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbors, and artificial neural networks. The SVM model was notably effective in classifying detachment force for rainfed cultivars, with a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.78. In contrast, the RF model was particularly adept for drip-irrigated cultivars, with an MCC of 0.75. The highest classification accuracies were recorded for the extreme force classes I and IV, with precision values of 0.93 and 0.8, respectively, while classes II and III had lower precision at 0.57 and 0.69. Implementing these ML models for detachment force classification has been beneficial, improving decision-making in mechanized harvesting systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 5","pages":"2362-2369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The maturation process of coffee (Coffea arabica) trees exhibits inherent variability, producing fruits at various physiological maturity stages. This variability affects the resistance between the fruit and its peduncle, posing a challenge in mechanized harvesting: non-selective harvesting. A precise classification of coffee fruit detachment force is essential to address this challenge, ensuring coffee's quality and producer's profitability. This study assesses the efficacy of machine learning (ML) models in determining the detachment force across various coffee cultivars under drip-irrigated and rainfed conditions. The dataset included detachment force measurements from 24 cultivars—13 drip-irrigated and 11 rainfed—yielding 1152 data points. Variance analysis compared irrigation methods and three maturity stages: green, cherry, and dry. Detachment force was categorized into four classes based on the dataset's quartile distribution. The ML models utilized were random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbors, and artificial neural networks. The SVM model was notably effective in classifying detachment force for rainfed cultivars, with a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.78. In contrast, the RF model was particularly adept for drip-irrigated cultivars, with an MCC of 0.75. The highest classification accuracies were recorded for the extreme force classes I and IV, with precision values of 0.93 and 0.8, respectively, while classes II and III had lower precision at 0.57 and 0.69. Implementing these ML models for detachment force classification has been beneficial, improving decision-making in mechanized harvesting systems.

用于对咖啡果脱落力进行分类的机器学习模型
咖啡(Coffea arabica)树的成熟过程表现出固有的多变性,在不同的生理成熟阶段结出不同的果实。这种变化会影响果实与果梗之间的阻力,给机械化采收带来挑战:非选择性采收。要应对这一挑战,确保咖啡的质量和生产商的盈利能力,就必须对咖啡果实的脱落力进行精确分类。本研究评估了机器学习(ML)模型在滴灌和雨水灌溉条件下确定各种咖啡栽培品种的脱落力方面的功效。数据集包括 24 个栽培品种--13 个滴灌栽培品种和 11 个雨浇栽培品种--产生的 1152 个数据点的脱落力测量结果。方差分析比较了灌溉方法和三个成熟阶段:青果、樱桃和干果。根据数据集的四分位分布,脱离力被分为四个等级。所使用的 ML 模型包括随机森林 (RF)、支持向量机 (SVM)、K-近邻和人工神经网络。SVM 模型对雨水灌溉栽培品种的脱离力分类效果显著,马修斯相关系数(MCC)为 0.78。相比之下,RF 模型特别适用于滴灌栽培品种,其马太相关系数为 0.75。极力等级 I 和 IV 的分类精度最高,分别为 0.93 和 0.8,而等级 II 和 III 的精度较低,分别为 0.57 和 0.69。采用这些 ML 模型进行剥离力分类是有益的,可以改进机械化收割系统的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信