A Long-Term and Global Energy Security Performance Evaluation Model Integrating Principle Component Analysis, Assurance Region Approach, and the Malmquist Technology

IF 4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Tai-Hsi Wu, Chi Yu
{"title":"A Long-Term and Global Energy Security Performance Evaluation Model Integrating Principle Component Analysis, Assurance Region Approach, and the Malmquist Technology","authors":"Tai-Hsi Wu, Chi Yu","doi":"10.1007/s13132-024-02198-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A comprehensive literature review on energy security performance (ESP) highlighted a major gap in long-term, systematic global ESP studies. While some studies have assessed ESP changes in various countries over 20 years to identify progress or decline, their methods may not accurately reflect long-term ESP trends. Furthermore, the Malmquist productivity index (MPI), commonly used for calculating intertemporal performances and efficiencies, lacks flexibility in adjusting weights for inputs and outputs in assessments. Addressing this gap, this study proposes PCA/MPI-AR, an integrated approach merging principal component analysis (PCA), the assurance region (AR) technique, and MPI, to analyze ESP trends in 125 countries from 1997 to 2017. The results showed MPI-AR scores ranging from 0.3543 to 4.2800, indicating a general trend of ESP improvement over 21 years, with significant recent progress compared to earlier periods. Notably, 107 countries scored at least 1.0, and 3 scored below 0.5. A grouping analysis classified 12 countries as “highly efficient and improving,” with Switzerland, Ireland, Denmark, and Luxembourg as benchmarks. For the countries labeled “inefficient and regressing,” understanding and potentially emulating the strategies of these benchmarks is essential. Adopting this integrated PCA/MPI-AR approach incorporates flexible weighting capabilities and marks a significant advancement in the field of ESP evaluation. It is anticipated that our model will not only align more closely with the real-world conditions under which energy policies are formulated and implemented but also provide a more precise tool for evaluating and comparing the efficiency of different countries in enhancing their ESP. The research also suggests three potential policy directions for improvement in underperforming countries: renewable energy investment, energy efficiency enhancement, and energy taxation policy, as well as enhancing international cooperation through sharing best practices and technologies. This approach allows countries with significant improvements to support those with declining ESP scores, promoting a unified approach to global energy security. Urgent reforms and targeted interventions are needed to address specific deficiencies, potentially drawing on strategies from more successful nations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02198-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A comprehensive literature review on energy security performance (ESP) highlighted a major gap in long-term, systematic global ESP studies. While some studies have assessed ESP changes in various countries over 20 years to identify progress or decline, their methods may not accurately reflect long-term ESP trends. Furthermore, the Malmquist productivity index (MPI), commonly used for calculating intertemporal performances and efficiencies, lacks flexibility in adjusting weights for inputs and outputs in assessments. Addressing this gap, this study proposes PCA/MPI-AR, an integrated approach merging principal component analysis (PCA), the assurance region (AR) technique, and MPI, to analyze ESP trends in 125 countries from 1997 to 2017. The results showed MPI-AR scores ranging from 0.3543 to 4.2800, indicating a general trend of ESP improvement over 21 years, with significant recent progress compared to earlier periods. Notably, 107 countries scored at least 1.0, and 3 scored below 0.5. A grouping analysis classified 12 countries as “highly efficient and improving,” with Switzerland, Ireland, Denmark, and Luxembourg as benchmarks. For the countries labeled “inefficient and regressing,” understanding and potentially emulating the strategies of these benchmarks is essential. Adopting this integrated PCA/MPI-AR approach incorporates flexible weighting capabilities and marks a significant advancement in the field of ESP evaluation. It is anticipated that our model will not only align more closely with the real-world conditions under which energy policies are formulated and implemented but also provide a more precise tool for evaluating and comparing the efficiency of different countries in enhancing their ESP. The research also suggests three potential policy directions for improvement in underperforming countries: renewable energy investment, energy efficiency enhancement, and energy taxation policy, as well as enhancing international cooperation through sharing best practices and technologies. This approach allows countries with significant improvements to support those with declining ESP scores, promoting a unified approach to global energy security. Urgent reforms and targeted interventions are needed to address specific deficiencies, potentially drawing on strategies from more successful nations.

Abstract Image

整合主成分分析法、保证区域法和 Malmquist 技术的长期和全球能源安全性能评估模型
关于能源安全绩效(ESP)的全面文献综述突出表明,在长期、系统的全球 ESP 研究方面存在重大差距。虽然一些研究评估了不同国家 20 年间的 ESP 变化,以确定是进步还是下降,但其方法可能无法准确反映 ESP 的长期趋势。此外,常用于计算跨时绩效和效率的马尔奎斯特生产力指数(MPI)在调整评估中的投入和产出权重方面缺乏灵活性。针对这一缺陷,本研究提出了一种融合主成分分析(PCA)、保证区域(AR)技术和 MPI 的综合方法 PCA/MPI-AR,以分析 125 个国家从 1997 年到 2017 年的 ESP 趋势。结果显示,MPI-AR 得分从 0.3543 到 4.2800 不等,表明 21 年来,ESP 总体呈改善趋势,与早期相比,近期进步显著。值得注意的是,107 个国家的得分至少为 1.0,3 个国家的得分低于 0.5。分组分析将 12 个国家划分为 "效率高且不断改进 "的国家,以瑞士、爱尔兰、丹麦和卢森堡为基准。对于被列为 "低效和退步 "的国家,了解并有可能效仿这些基准国家的战略至关重要。采用这种 PCA/MPI-AR 综合方法结合了灵活的加权能力,标志着 ESP 评估领域的重大进步。预计我们的模型不仅能更贴近能源政策制定和实施的实际情况,还能为评估和比较不同国家在加强ESP方面的效率提供更精确的工具。研究还为表现不佳的国家提出了三个潜在的改进政策方向:可再生能源投资、提高能效和能源税收政策,以及通过分享最佳实践和技术加强国际合作。这种方法可以让有明显改善的国家支持ESP得分下降的国家,促进全球能源安全的统一方法。需要进行紧急改革和有针对性的干预,以解决具体的不足之处,并有可能借鉴更成功国家的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
27.30%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: In the context of rapid globalization and technological capacity, the world’s economies today are driven increasingly by knowledge—the expertise, skills, experience, education, understanding, awareness, perception, and other qualities required to communicate, interpret, and analyze information. New wealth is created by the application of knowledge to improve productivity—and to create new products, services, systems, and process (i.e., to innovate). The Journal of the Knowledge Economy focuses on the dynamics of the knowledge-based economy, with an emphasis on the role of knowledge creation, diffusion, and application across three economic levels: (1) the systemic ''meta'' or ''macro''-level, (2) the organizational ''meso''-level, and (3) the individual ''micro''-level. The journal incorporates insights from the fields of economics, management, law, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and political science to shed new light on the evolving role of knowledge, with a particular emphasis on how innovation can be leveraged to provide solutions to complex problems and issues, including global crises in environmental sustainability, education, and economic development. Articles emphasize empirical studies, underscoring a comparative approach, and, to a lesser extent, case studies and theoretical articles. The journal balances practice/application and theory/concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信