Monte Carlo method for evaluation of surface emission rate measurement uncertainty

IF 3.6 1区 物理与天体物理 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Yuan-Qiao Li, Min Lin, Li-Jun Xu, Rui Luo, Yu-He Zhang, Qian-Xi Ni, Yun-Tao Liu
{"title":"Monte Carlo method for evaluation of surface emission rate measurement uncertainty","authors":"Yuan-Qiao Li, Min Lin, Li-Jun Xu, Rui Luo, Yu-He Zhang, Qian-Xi Ni, Yun-Tao Liu","doi":"10.1007/s41365-024-01474-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the uncertainty of <span>\\(2\\pi \\alpha \\)</span> and <span>\\(2\\pi \\beta \\)</span> surface emission rates using the windowless multiwire proportional counter method. This study used the Monte Carlo method (MCM) to validate the conventional Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) method. A dead time measurement model for the two-source method was established based on the characteristics of a single-channel measurement system, and the voltage threshold correction factor measurement function was indirectly obtained by fitting the threshold correction curve. The uncertainty in the surface emission rate was calculated using the GUM method and the law of propagation of uncertainty. The MCM provided clear definitions for each input quantity and its uncertainty distribution, and the simulation training was realized with a complete and complex mathematical model. The results of the surface emission rate uncertainty evaluation for four radioactive plane sources using both methods showed the uncertainty’s consistency <span>\\(E_\\text {n} &lt; 0.070\\)</span> for the comparison of each source, and the uncertainty results of the GUM were all lower than those of the MCM. However, the MCM has a more objective evaluation process and can serve as a validation tool for GUM results.</p>","PeriodicalId":19177,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Science and Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Science and Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01474-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the uncertainty of \(2\pi \alpha \) and \(2\pi \beta \) surface emission rates using the windowless multiwire proportional counter method. This study used the Monte Carlo method (MCM) to validate the conventional Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) method. A dead time measurement model for the two-source method was established based on the characteristics of a single-channel measurement system, and the voltage threshold correction factor measurement function was indirectly obtained by fitting the threshold correction curve. The uncertainty in the surface emission rate was calculated using the GUM method and the law of propagation of uncertainty. The MCM provided clear definitions for each input quantity and its uncertainty distribution, and the simulation training was realized with a complete and complex mathematical model. The results of the surface emission rate uncertainty evaluation for four radioactive plane sources using both methods showed the uncertainty’s consistency \(E_\text {n} < 0.070\) for the comparison of each source, and the uncertainty results of the GUM were all lower than those of the MCM. However, the MCM has a more objective evaluation process and can serve as a validation tool for GUM results.

Abstract Image

评估表面发射率测量不确定性的蒙特卡罗方法
本研究的目的是使用无窗多线比例计数器方法评估\(2\pi \alpha\)和\(2\pi \beta\)表面发射率的不确定性。这项研究使用蒙特卡罗方法(MCM)验证了传统的测量不确定性表达指南(GUM)方法。根据单通道测量系统的特性建立了双源法的死区时间测量模型,并通过拟合阈值修正曲线间接获得了电压阈值修正因子测量函数。利用 GUM 法和不确定度传播定律计算了表面发射率的不确定度。MCM 为每个输入量及其不确定度分布提供了明确的定义,并通过完整而复杂的数学模型实现了仿真训练。采用两种方法对 4 个平面放射源的面发射率不确定度评价结果表明,各放射源的不确定度比较一致(E_\text {n} <0.070\),GUM 的不确定度结果均低于 MCM 的不确定度结果。不过,MCM 的评价过程更加客观,可以作为 GUM 结果的验证工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nuclear Science and Techniques
Nuclear Science and Techniques 物理-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
39.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Science and Techniques (NST) reports scientific findings, technical advances and important results in the fields of nuclear science and techniques. The aim of this periodical is to stimulate cross-fertilization of knowledge among scientists and engineers working in the fields of nuclear research. Scope covers the following subjects: • Synchrotron radiation applications, beamline technology; • Accelerator, ray technology and applications; • Nuclear chemistry, radiochemistry, radiopharmaceuticals, nuclear medicine; • Nuclear electronics and instrumentation; • Nuclear physics and interdisciplinary research; • Nuclear energy science and engineering.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信