Exploring clinical reasoning development perspectives among final year medical students

Q2 Social Sciences
Gul Mehar Javaid Bukhari , Abel Jacobus Pienaar , Gideon Victor , Sara Khan , Javeria Saleem
{"title":"Exploring clinical reasoning development perspectives among final year medical students","authors":"Gul Mehar Javaid Bukhari ,&nbsp;Abel Jacobus Pienaar ,&nbsp;Gideon Victor ,&nbsp;Sara Khan ,&nbsp;Javeria Saleem","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2024.100958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Clinical reasoning is essential for effective clinical practice. Clinical reasoning helps medical students for clinical decision-making. However, development of clinical reasoning is challenging. The purpose of this study was to explore clinical reasoning perspectives among final year medical students.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Exploratory descriptive qualitative research design was employed. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee. Data were collected through focused group discussion from 2 medical colleges in English language. A semi-structured guide was used for data collection. Manual content analysis was applied for data analysis. The data were summarized in categories, subcategories that were presented with their pertinent direct quotes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six categories namely mentoring support and guidance, learning challenges, teaching and learning methods, assessment and feedback, systematic thinking, and being a life-long learning were developed. The categories represented appreciating and devaluating expressions of medical students for the development of clinical reasoning. Medical students expressed the need for mentoring, bridging theory-practice gap, clinical resources, thinking systematically and role of life-long learning. Whereas, curriculum overload, decontextualized curriculum, practice inconsistencies, and cultural issues hinder development of clinical reasoning. Challenges can be alleviated with effective clinical strategies, role modeling, being and becoming life-long learner and evidence-based medical practices.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Medical students were aware about the significance of clinical reasoning. However, development of clinical reasoning was hinder by number of learning challenges. Alleviation of learning challenges is imperative for the development of clinical reasoning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324000731/pdfft?md5=bc5b13bf110df0aea00fa0b988068a31&pid=1-s2.0-S1575181324000731-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324000731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Clinical reasoning is essential for effective clinical practice. Clinical reasoning helps medical students for clinical decision-making. However, development of clinical reasoning is challenging. The purpose of this study was to explore clinical reasoning perspectives among final year medical students.

Methods

Exploratory descriptive qualitative research design was employed. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee. Data were collected through focused group discussion from 2 medical colleges in English language. A semi-structured guide was used for data collection. Manual content analysis was applied for data analysis. The data were summarized in categories, subcategories that were presented with their pertinent direct quotes.

Results

Six categories namely mentoring support and guidance, learning challenges, teaching and learning methods, assessment and feedback, systematic thinking, and being a life-long learning were developed. The categories represented appreciating and devaluating expressions of medical students for the development of clinical reasoning. Medical students expressed the need for mentoring, bridging theory-practice gap, clinical resources, thinking systematically and role of life-long learning. Whereas, curriculum overload, decontextualized curriculum, practice inconsistencies, and cultural issues hinder development of clinical reasoning. Challenges can be alleviated with effective clinical strategies, role modeling, being and becoming life-long learner and evidence-based medical practices.

Conclusion

Medical students were aware about the significance of clinical reasoning. However, development of clinical reasoning was hinder by number of learning challenges. Alleviation of learning challenges is imperative for the development of clinical reasoning.

探讨医学专业毕业班学生的临床推理能力发展前景
引言 临床推理对于有效的临床实践至关重要。临床推理有助于医学生做出临床决策。然而,临床推理能力的培养具有挑战性。本研究旨在探讨毕业班医学生的临床推理观点。本研究获得了机构审查委员会和伦理委员会的批准。数据是通过两所医学院的英语焦点小组讨论收集的。数据收集采用半结构式指南。数据分析采用人工内容分析法。结果共分为六个类别,即辅导支持与指导、学习挑战、教学方法、评估与反馈、系统思考和终身学习。这些类别代表了医学生对临床推理能力发展的赞赏和贬低。医学生表示需要导师指导、缩小理论与实践的差距、临床资源、系统思考和终身学习的作用。而课程负担过重、课程内容脱节、实践不一致和文化问题则阻碍了临床推理能力的发展。这些挑战可以通过有效的临床策略、榜样示范、终身学习和循证医学实践来缓解。然而,临床推理能力的发展受到了许多学习挑战的阻碍。要发展临床推理能力,必须缓解学习挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信