Gul Mehar Javaid Bukhari , Abel Jacobus Pienaar , Gideon Victor , Sara Khan , Javeria Saleem
{"title":"Exploring clinical reasoning development perspectives among final year medical students","authors":"Gul Mehar Javaid Bukhari , Abel Jacobus Pienaar , Gideon Victor , Sara Khan , Javeria Saleem","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2024.100958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Clinical reasoning is essential for effective clinical practice. Clinical reasoning helps medical students for clinical decision-making. However, development of clinical reasoning is challenging. The purpose of this study was to explore clinical reasoning perspectives among final year medical students.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Exploratory descriptive qualitative research design was employed. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee. Data were collected through focused group discussion from 2 medical colleges in English language. A semi-structured guide was used for data collection. Manual content analysis was applied for data analysis. The data were summarized in categories, subcategories that were presented with their pertinent direct quotes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six categories namely mentoring support and guidance, learning challenges, teaching and learning methods, assessment and feedback, systematic thinking, and being a life-long learning were developed. The categories represented appreciating and devaluating expressions of medical students for the development of clinical reasoning. Medical students expressed the need for mentoring, bridging theory-practice gap, clinical resources, thinking systematically and role of life-long learning. Whereas, curriculum overload, decontextualized curriculum, practice inconsistencies, and cultural issues hinder development of clinical reasoning. Challenges can be alleviated with effective clinical strategies, role modeling, being and becoming life-long learner and evidence-based medical practices.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Medical students were aware about the significance of clinical reasoning. However, development of clinical reasoning was hinder by number of learning challenges. Alleviation of learning challenges is imperative for the development of clinical reasoning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324000731/pdfft?md5=bc5b13bf110df0aea00fa0b988068a31&pid=1-s2.0-S1575181324000731-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324000731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Clinical reasoning is essential for effective clinical practice. Clinical reasoning helps medical students for clinical decision-making. However, development of clinical reasoning is challenging. The purpose of this study was to explore clinical reasoning perspectives among final year medical students.
Methods
Exploratory descriptive qualitative research design was employed. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee. Data were collected through focused group discussion from 2 medical colleges in English language. A semi-structured guide was used for data collection. Manual content analysis was applied for data analysis. The data were summarized in categories, subcategories that were presented with their pertinent direct quotes.
Results
Six categories namely mentoring support and guidance, learning challenges, teaching and learning methods, assessment and feedback, systematic thinking, and being a life-long learning were developed. The categories represented appreciating and devaluating expressions of medical students for the development of clinical reasoning. Medical students expressed the need for mentoring, bridging theory-practice gap, clinical resources, thinking systematically and role of life-long learning. Whereas, curriculum overload, decontextualized curriculum, practice inconsistencies, and cultural issues hinder development of clinical reasoning. Challenges can be alleviated with effective clinical strategies, role modeling, being and becoming life-long learner and evidence-based medical practices.
Conclusion
Medical students were aware about the significance of clinical reasoning. However, development of clinical reasoning was hinder by number of learning challenges. Alleviation of learning challenges is imperative for the development of clinical reasoning.
期刊介绍:
Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.