Second-line treatment outcomes after first-line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in Extensive-Stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients: A large French multicenter study
Elvire Pons-Tostivint , Remy Ezzedine , Thomas Goronflot , Perrine Crequit , Thierry Chatellier , Judith Raimbourg , Jaafar Bennouna , Etienne Giroux Leprieur , Marie Porte
{"title":"Second-line treatment outcomes after first-line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in Extensive-Stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients: A large French multicenter study","authors":"Elvire Pons-Tostivint , Remy Ezzedine , Thomas Goronflot , Perrine Crequit , Thierry Chatellier , Judith Raimbourg , Jaafar Bennouna , Etienne Giroux Leprieur , Marie Porte","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (CT-IO) is the standard treatment for patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC). This study evaluates the effectiveness of second-line (2L) following CT-IO.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>All patients from 10 centers who received a 2L after a first-line CT-IO were included. They were divided into 3 groups: platinum-based, lurbinectedin or others (topotecan, CAV, taxanes). We assessed overall survival (OS) and 2L progression-free survival (2L-PFS) according to treatment and platinum free-interval (PFI) <span><math><mo><</mo></math></span> or <span><math><mo>≥</mo></math></span> 90 days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 82 patients included, median age was 67.0 years, 29.3 % had a Performans Status ≥ 2, 36.6 % had brain progression, 69.5 % were considered “platine-sensitive” and 30.5 % “platine-resistant” (PFI ≥ or <span><math><mo><</mo></math></span> 90 days, respectively). As 2L, 37/82 patients (45.1 %) received platinum-doublet, 21/82 (25.6 %) lurbinectedin and 24/82 (29.3 %) others. Patients with a PFI ≥ 90 days received mainly platinum-based rechallenge (34/57, 59.6 %). With a median follow-up of 18.5 months, the median OS was 5.0 months (95 %CI, 1.5–7.9) / 6.8 months (95 %CI, 5.5–8.7) for platinum-resistant / sensitive, respectively (log rank p = 0.017). The median 2L-PFS was 1.9 months (95 %CI, 1.2–4.7) / 3.9 months (95 %CI, 2.9–6.0) for platinum-resistant / sensitive, respectively. Median OS was 8.1 (95 %CI, 6.3–12.9) / 4.9 (95 %CI, 3.7–6.8) / 5.1 months (95 %CI, 2.5–7.8) with platinum rechallenge / lurbinectedin / others, respectively (p = 0.017). Median 2L-PFS was 4.6 (95 %CI, 3.9–7.2) / 2.7 (95 %CI, 1.6–3.9) / 2.2 months (95 %CI, 1.5–4.1) with platinum rechallenge / lurbinectedin / others, respectively (p = 0.025).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Platinum-based rechallenge after a first-line CT-IO showed promising results despite particularly unfavorable characteristics within our real-word population. Lurbinectedin when used after IO demonstrated as low efficacy as other platinum-free regimens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 107887"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500224004215","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (CT-IO) is the standard treatment for patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC). This study evaluates the effectiveness of second-line (2L) following CT-IO.
Patients and Methods
All patients from 10 centers who received a 2L after a first-line CT-IO were included. They were divided into 3 groups: platinum-based, lurbinectedin or others (topotecan, CAV, taxanes). We assessed overall survival (OS) and 2L progression-free survival (2L-PFS) according to treatment and platinum free-interval (PFI) or 90 days.
Results
Among 82 patients included, median age was 67.0 years, 29.3 % had a Performans Status ≥ 2, 36.6 % had brain progression, 69.5 % were considered “platine-sensitive” and 30.5 % “platine-resistant” (PFI ≥ or 90 days, respectively). As 2L, 37/82 patients (45.1 %) received platinum-doublet, 21/82 (25.6 %) lurbinectedin and 24/82 (29.3 %) others. Patients with a PFI ≥ 90 days received mainly platinum-based rechallenge (34/57, 59.6 %). With a median follow-up of 18.5 months, the median OS was 5.0 months (95 %CI, 1.5–7.9) / 6.8 months (95 %CI, 5.5–8.7) for platinum-resistant / sensitive, respectively (log rank p = 0.017). The median 2L-PFS was 1.9 months (95 %CI, 1.2–4.7) / 3.9 months (95 %CI, 2.9–6.0) for platinum-resistant / sensitive, respectively. Median OS was 8.1 (95 %CI, 6.3–12.9) / 4.9 (95 %CI, 3.7–6.8) / 5.1 months (95 %CI, 2.5–7.8) with platinum rechallenge / lurbinectedin / others, respectively (p = 0.017). Median 2L-PFS was 4.6 (95 %CI, 3.9–7.2) / 2.7 (95 %CI, 1.6–3.9) / 2.2 months (95 %CI, 1.5–4.1) with platinum rechallenge / lurbinectedin / others, respectively (p = 0.025).
Discussion
Platinum-based rechallenge after a first-line CT-IO showed promising results despite particularly unfavorable characteristics within our real-word population. Lurbinectedin when used after IO demonstrated as low efficacy as other platinum-free regimens.
期刊介绍:
Lung Cancer is an international publication covering the clinical, translational and basic science of malignancies of the lung and chest region.Original research articles, early reports, review articles, editorials and correspondence covering the prevention, epidemiology and etiology, basic biology, pathology, clinical assessment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combined treatment modalities, other treatment modalities and outcomes of lung cancer are welcome.