The politics of ward committees in enhancing community development through democratic participation in the perspective of structuration

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Nsizwazonke E Yende, Petunia B Mahlangu, Andiswa Mkhwanazi
{"title":"The politics of ward committees in enhancing community development through democratic participation in the perspective of structuration","authors":"Nsizwazonke E Yende, Petunia B Mahlangu, Andiswa Mkhwanazi","doi":"10.1093/cdj/bsae035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper aims to explore the politics of ward committees in enhancing community development through participation. In post-1994 South Africa, ward committees are perceived as one of the key structures that are constitutionally required to be established to enhance community development through democratic participation. These structures are envisioned as playing a critical role in ensuring a contact between local people at the grass-roots level and their local authorities. Despite the conspicuous successes of establishing the ward committees at the municipal level, their effectiveness in executing their constitutional mandate remains an issue. This is because such structures have been ‘caught up’ in ambiguous political contestations at the local level. Hence, these structures are perceived as ‘watchdogs’ and an extension of the dominant party from the ward level to the municipality level. This negatively affects their ability to progressively realize their constitutional mandate. This paper adopts a secondary research approach to explore the politics of ward committees in enhancing community development. Gidden’s theory of structuration is employed as a theoretical lens to interpret the findings. Based on this theory, the paper highlights that ward committees are ineffective in promoting community development through democratic participation because of the environment within which they operate. Thus, the environment where these structures operate is characterized by power dynamics, and intra- and inter-political fighting, which provide a context within which they can operate. The paper concludes by recommending that the government should consider professionalizing ward committees to enhance their effectiveness in the complex environment within which they operate.","PeriodicalId":47329,"journal":{"name":"Community Development Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsae035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper aims to explore the politics of ward committees in enhancing community development through participation. In post-1994 South Africa, ward committees are perceived as one of the key structures that are constitutionally required to be established to enhance community development through democratic participation. These structures are envisioned as playing a critical role in ensuring a contact between local people at the grass-roots level and their local authorities. Despite the conspicuous successes of establishing the ward committees at the municipal level, their effectiveness in executing their constitutional mandate remains an issue. This is because such structures have been ‘caught up’ in ambiguous political contestations at the local level. Hence, these structures are perceived as ‘watchdogs’ and an extension of the dominant party from the ward level to the municipality level. This negatively affects their ability to progressively realize their constitutional mandate. This paper adopts a secondary research approach to explore the politics of ward committees in enhancing community development. Gidden’s theory of structuration is employed as a theoretical lens to interpret the findings. Based on this theory, the paper highlights that ward committees are ineffective in promoting community development through democratic participation because of the environment within which they operate. Thus, the environment where these structures operate is characterized by power dynamics, and intra- and inter-political fighting, which provide a context within which they can operate. The paper concludes by recommending that the government should consider professionalizing ward committees to enhance their effectiveness in the complex environment within which they operate.
从结构化角度看选区委员会通过民主参与促进社区发展的政治作用
本文旨在探讨选区委员会在通过参与促进社区发展方面的政治作用。在 1994 年后的南非,选区委员会被视为宪法要求建立的通过民主参与促进社区发展的关键机构之一。根据设想,这些机构将在确保基层民众与地方当局之间的联系方面发挥关键作用。尽管在市一级建立选区委员会取得了显著的成功,但这些委员会在执行其宪法任务方面的有效性仍然是一个问题。这是因为这些机构 "卷入 "了地方一级模棱两可的政治角逐。因此,这些机构被视为 "看门狗",是占主导地位的政党从区一级向市一级的延伸。这对它们逐步实现其宪法使命的能力产生了负面影响。本文采用二次研究的方法来探讨选区委员会在促进社区发展方面的政治作用。本文采用 Gidden 的结构化理论作为理论视角来解释研究结果。基于这一理论,本文强调选区委员会在通过民主参与促进社区发展方面效果不佳,原因在于其运作环境。因此,这些机构的运作环境以权力动态、政治内部和政治之间的争斗为特征,这为它们的运作提供了环境。本文最后建议,政府应考虑将选区委员会专业化,以提高其在复杂的运作环境中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community Development Journal
Community Development Journal DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Since 1966 the leading international journal in its field, covering a wide range of topics, reviewing significant developments and providing a forum for cutting-edge debates about theory and practice. It adopts a broad definition of community development to include policy, planning and action as they impact on the life of communities. We particularly seek to publish critically focused articles which challenge received wisdom, report and discuss innovative practices, and relate issues of community development to questions of social justice, diversity and environmental sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信