Propionate production by Bacteroidia gut bacteria and its dependence on substrate concentrations differs among species

IF 6.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Carolin Döring, Mirko Basen
{"title":"Propionate production by Bacteroidia gut bacteria and its dependence on substrate concentrations differs among species","authors":"Carolin Döring,&nbsp;Mirko Basen","doi":"10.1186/s13068-024-02539-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Propionate is a food preservative and platform chemical, but no biological process competes with current petrochemical production routes yet. Although propionate production has been described for gut bacteria of the class <i>Bacteroidia</i>, which also carry great capacity for the degradation of plant polymers, knowledge on propionate yields and productivities across species is scarce. This study aims to compare propionate production from glucose within <i>Bacteroidia</i> and characterize good propionate producers among this group.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>We collected published information on propionate producing <i>Bacteroidia,</i> and selected ten species to be further examined. These species were grown under defined conditions to compare their product formation. While propionate, acetate, succinate, lactate and formate were produced, the product ratios varied greatly among the species. The two species with highest propionate yield, <i>B. propionicifaciens</i> (0.39 g<sub>pro</sub>/g<sub>gluc</sub>) and <i>B. graminisolvens</i> (0.25 g<sub>pro</sub>/g<sub>gluc</sub>), were further examined. Product formation and growth behavior differed significantly during CO<sub>2</sub>-limited growth and in resting cells experiments, as only <i>B. graminisolvens</i> depended on external-added NaHCO<sub>3</sub>, while their genome sequences only revealed few differences in the major catabolic pathways. Carbon mass and electron balances in experiments with resting cells were closed under the assumption that the oxidative pentose pathway was utilized for glucose oxidation next to glycolysis in <i>B. graminisolvens</i>. Finally, during pH-controlled fed-batch cultivation <i>B. propionicifaciens</i> and <i>B. graminisolvens</i> grew up to cell densities (OD<sub>600</sub>) of 8.1 and 9.8, and produced 119 mM and 33 mM of propionate from 130 and 105 mM glucose, respectively. A significant production of other acids, particularly lactate (25 mM), was observed in <i>B. graminisolvens</i> only.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We obtained the first broad overview and comparison of propionate production in <i>Bacteroidia</i> strains. A closer look at two species with comparably high propionate yields, showed significant differences in their physiology. Further studies may reveal the molecular basis for high propionate yields in <i>Bacteroidia</i>, paving the road towards their biotechnological application for conversion of biomass-derived sugars to propionate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":494,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology for Biofuels","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://biotechnologyforbiofuels.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13068-024-02539-9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology for Biofuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13068-024-02539-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Propionate is a food preservative and platform chemical, but no biological process competes with current petrochemical production routes yet. Although propionate production has been described for gut bacteria of the class Bacteroidia, which also carry great capacity for the degradation of plant polymers, knowledge on propionate yields and productivities across species is scarce. This study aims to compare propionate production from glucose within Bacteroidia and characterize good propionate producers among this group.

Results

We collected published information on propionate producing Bacteroidia, and selected ten species to be further examined. These species were grown under defined conditions to compare their product formation. While propionate, acetate, succinate, lactate and formate were produced, the product ratios varied greatly among the species. The two species with highest propionate yield, B. propionicifaciens (0.39 gpro/ggluc) and B. graminisolvens (0.25 gpro/ggluc), were further examined. Product formation and growth behavior differed significantly during CO2-limited growth and in resting cells experiments, as only B. graminisolvens depended on external-added NaHCO3, while their genome sequences only revealed few differences in the major catabolic pathways. Carbon mass and electron balances in experiments with resting cells were closed under the assumption that the oxidative pentose pathway was utilized for glucose oxidation next to glycolysis in B. graminisolvens. Finally, during pH-controlled fed-batch cultivation B. propionicifaciens and B. graminisolvens grew up to cell densities (OD600) of 8.1 and 9.8, and produced 119 mM and 33 mM of propionate from 130 and 105 mM glucose, respectively. A significant production of other acids, particularly lactate (25 mM), was observed in B. graminisolvens only.

Conclusions

We obtained the first broad overview and comparison of propionate production in Bacteroidia strains. A closer look at two species with comparably high propionate yields, showed significant differences in their physiology. Further studies may reveal the molecular basis for high propionate yields in Bacteroidia, paving the road towards their biotechnological application for conversion of biomass-derived sugars to propionate.

肠道细菌产生的丙酸盐及其对底物浓度的依赖性因物种而异
丙酸盐是一种食品防腐剂和平台化学品,但目前还没有一种生物工艺能与现有的石油化工生产路线相抗衡。虽然类杆菌属肠道细菌也具有降解植物聚合物的强大能力,但关于不同物种丙酸盐产量和生产率的知识却很少。本研究旨在比较类杆菌中葡萄糖丙酸盐的产量,并描述该类细菌中丙酸盐产量高的细菌的特征。我们收集了已发表的有关产丙酸杆菌的信息,并选择了 10 个物种进行进一步研究。这些菌种在特定条件下生长,以比较其产品的形成。虽然能产生丙酸盐、乙酸盐、琥珀酸盐、乳酸盐和甲酸盐,但不同种类的产品比例差异很大。我们进一步研究了丙酸盐产量最高的两个物种,即 B. propionicifaciens(0.39 gpro/ggluc)和 B. graminisolvens(0.25 gpro/ggluc)。在 CO2 限制生长和静止细胞实验中,产物的形成和生长行为有很大不同,因为只有 B. graminisolvens 依赖于外部添加的 NaHCO3,而它们的基因组序列只显示了主要分解途径的极少差异。静止细胞实验中的碳质量和电子平衡是封闭的,假设禾本科菌利用五糖氧化途径进行葡萄糖氧化,而不是糖酵解。最后,在 pH 值控制的分批进行的喂养培养过程中,丙酸杆菌和革兰氏菌的细胞密度(OD600)分别达到了 8.1 和 9.8,并分别从 130 毫摩尔和 105 毫摩尔的葡萄糖中产生了 119 毫摩尔和 33 毫摩尔的丙酸。仅在 B. graminisolvens 中观察到大量生产其他酸类,特别是乳酸(25 mM)。我们首次对类杆菌菌株产生丙酸的情况进行了广泛的概述和比较。仔细观察丙酸盐产量相当高的两个物种,发现它们的生理机能存在显著差异。进一步的研究可能会揭示类杆菌高丙酸盐产量的分子基础,为将生物质衍生糖转化为丙酸盐的生物技术应用铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biotechnology for Biofuels
Biotechnology for Biofuels 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Biotechnology for Biofuels is an open access peer-reviewed journal featuring high-quality studies describing technological and operational advances in the production of biofuels, chemicals and other bioproducts. The journal emphasizes understanding and advancing the application of biotechnology and synergistic operations to improve plants and biological conversion systems for the biological production of these products from biomass, intermediates derived from biomass, or CO2, as well as upstream or downstream operations that are integral to biological conversion of biomass. Biotechnology for Biofuels focuses on the following areas: • Development of terrestrial plant feedstocks • Development of algal feedstocks • Biomass pretreatment, fractionation and extraction for biological conversion • Enzyme engineering, production and analysis • Bacterial genetics, physiology and metabolic engineering • Fungal/yeast genetics, physiology and metabolic engineering • Fermentation, biocatalytic conversion and reaction dynamics • Biological production of chemicals and bioproducts from biomass • Anaerobic digestion, biohydrogen and bioelectricity • Bioprocess integration, techno-economic analysis, modelling and policy • Life cycle assessment and environmental impact analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信