Anchorage and lap capacity of plain surface and square twisted bars in existing R.C. Structures: A comprehensive approach

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
John Cairns, Lisa R. Feldman, Fabrizio Palmisano
{"title":"Anchorage and lap capacity of plain surface and square twisted bars in existing R.C. Structures: A comprehensive approach","authors":"John Cairns, Lisa R. Feldman, Fabrizio Palmisano","doi":"10.1002/suco.202400081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although plain round or square section reinforcement is no longer used in new construction, there are many older structures still in service built with such bars. In recognition of the need for guidance on the assessment of load‐carrying capacity of structures reinforced with such bars, design codes are now introducing or re‐introducing provisions to assess the capacity of laps and anchorages of such reinforcement. The authors have contributed to the introduction of design rules in the <jats:italic>fib</jats:italic> Model Code 2020. This paper describes the derivation of these provisions. Starting from the form of expression proposed earlier by the authors, the data from which these proposals are derived is specified and modifications in interpretation preparatory to a statistical analysis are outlined. A rigorous multivariate statistical procedure is then employed firstly to determine a mean strength expression for the capacity of anchorages and laps which is then validated against test data. Further statistical analysis is subsequently used to determine a design expression using the approach outlined in EN 1990, taking appropriate account scatter in test data. Finally, some comparisons are presented between the assessment expressions proposed and design provisions that were in place when these types of bars were in common use. Areas where earlier design provisions may be non‐conservative are identified.","PeriodicalId":21988,"journal":{"name":"Structural Concrete","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Concrete","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202400081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although plain round or square section reinforcement is no longer used in new construction, there are many older structures still in service built with such bars. In recognition of the need for guidance on the assessment of load‐carrying capacity of structures reinforced with such bars, design codes are now introducing or re‐introducing provisions to assess the capacity of laps and anchorages of such reinforcement. The authors have contributed to the introduction of design rules in the fib Model Code 2020. This paper describes the derivation of these provisions. Starting from the form of expression proposed earlier by the authors, the data from which these proposals are derived is specified and modifications in interpretation preparatory to a statistical analysis are outlined. A rigorous multivariate statistical procedure is then employed firstly to determine a mean strength expression for the capacity of anchorages and laps which is then validated against test data. Further statistical analysis is subsequently used to determine a design expression using the approach outlined in EN 1990, taking appropriate account scatter in test data. Finally, some comparisons are presented between the assessment expressions proposed and design provisions that were in place when these types of bars were in common use. Areas where earlier design provisions may be non‐conservative are identified.
现有 R.C. 结构中普通表面和方形扭曲钢筋的锚固和搭接能力:综合方法
尽管普通圆形或方形截面钢筋已不再用于新建筑中,但仍有许多使用此类钢筋的旧建筑在使用中。考虑到需要对使用此类钢筋加固的结构的承载能力评估提供指导,设计规范目前正在引入或重新引入有关条款,以评估此类钢筋的搭接和锚固的承载能力。作者为在《2020 纤维示范规范》中引入设计规则做出了贡献。本文介绍了这些规定的推导过程。从作者早先提出的表达形式开始,具体说明了这些建议所依据的数据,并概述了为统计分析做准备的解释修改。然后采用严格的多元统计程序,首先确定锚固件和搭接件承载力的平均强度表达式,然后根据测试数据对其进行验证。随后,使用 EN 1990 中概述的方法进行进一步的统计分析,以确定设计表达式,同时适当考虑测试数据的分散性。最后,对提出的评估表达式与这些类型的钢筋普遍使用时的设计规定进行了比较。确定了早期设计规定可能不严谨的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Structural Concrete
Structural Concrete CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-ENGINEERING, CIVIL
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
15.60%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Structural Concrete, the official journal of the fib, provides conceptual and procedural guidance in the field of concrete construction, and features peer-reviewed papers, keynote research and industry news covering all aspects of the design, construction, performance in service and demolition of concrete structures. Main topics: design, construction, performance in service, conservation (assessment, maintenance, strengthening) and demolition of concrete structures research about the behaviour of concrete structures development of design methods fib Model Code sustainability of concrete structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信