Main pulmonary artery diameter related to pneumonia severity

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Clinical Anatomy Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1002/ca.24203
Luis Carlos Lozano-Carrillo, Luis Adrian Alvarez-Lozada, Bernardo Alfonso Fernández-Reyes, Karla V. Rodríguez-Alanís, Alberto Montemayor-Martinez, Oscar de-la-Garza-Castro, Alejandro Quiroga-Garza, Rodrigo Enrique Elizondo-Omaña
{"title":"Main pulmonary artery diameter related to pneumonia severity","authors":"Luis Carlos Lozano-Carrillo,&nbsp;Luis Adrian Alvarez-Lozada,&nbsp;Bernardo Alfonso Fernández-Reyes,&nbsp;Karla V. Rodríguez-Alanís,&nbsp;Alberto Montemayor-Martinez,&nbsp;Oscar de-la-Garza-Castro,&nbsp;Alejandro Quiroga-Garza,&nbsp;Rodrigo Enrique Elizondo-Omaña","doi":"10.1002/ca.24203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The diameter (mPAD) of the main pulmonary artery (pulmonary artery trunk) is a crucial indicator for cardiovascular health and prognoses in various conditions. Its enlargement is associated with increased mortality and severity in COVID-19-related pneumonia. However, its relevance to non-COVID pneumonia remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to establish an association between mPAD and the severity of non-COVID pneumonia. Eligible participants with qualified Chest Computed Tomography scans from November 2019 to February 2023 were recruited to a cross-sectional retrospective study. They were stratified into pneumonia and non-pneumonia cohorts. Exclusion criteria included pulmonary hypertension, polytrauma, lung neoplasia, or a history of pulmonary stenosis repair. The mPAD was measured in both groups, and medical records were reviewed to identify comorbidities. Pulmonary CT data were classified by pattern and severity, and the mPAD was measured perpendicularly to the long axis of the artery at the point of bifurcation on an axial slice. Analysis of 380 CT scans (52.6% men, 47.4% women; mean age 52.88 ± 17.58) revealed a significant difference in mPAD between pneumonia and non-pneumonia cases (mean difference: 1.19 mm, 95% CI [0.46, 1.92], <i>p</i> = 0.001). Age correlated positively with mPAD (<i>r</i> = 0.231, 95% CI [0.028, 0.069], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), and this correlation persisted after adjusting for confounders (<i>r</i> = 0.220, 95% CI [0.019, 0.073], <i>p</i> = 0.001). Ordinal logistic regression indicated 1.28 times higher odds of severe pneumonia with a larger diameter. The study highlights associations between mPAD, pneumonia, and severity, suggesting clinical relevance. Furthermore, the mPAD should be carefully considered in defining severity criteria for adverse outcomes in pneumonia patients. Further research is needed to refine clinical criteria on the basis of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":"37 7","pages":"784-790"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ca.24203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diameter (mPAD) of the main pulmonary artery (pulmonary artery trunk) is a crucial indicator for cardiovascular health and prognoses in various conditions. Its enlargement is associated with increased mortality and severity in COVID-19-related pneumonia. However, its relevance to non-COVID pneumonia remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to establish an association between mPAD and the severity of non-COVID pneumonia. Eligible participants with qualified Chest Computed Tomography scans from November 2019 to February 2023 were recruited to a cross-sectional retrospective study. They were stratified into pneumonia and non-pneumonia cohorts. Exclusion criteria included pulmonary hypertension, polytrauma, lung neoplasia, or a history of pulmonary stenosis repair. The mPAD was measured in both groups, and medical records were reviewed to identify comorbidities. Pulmonary CT data were classified by pattern and severity, and the mPAD was measured perpendicularly to the long axis of the artery at the point of bifurcation on an axial slice. Analysis of 380 CT scans (52.6% men, 47.4% women; mean age 52.88 ± 17.58) revealed a significant difference in mPAD between pneumonia and non-pneumonia cases (mean difference: 1.19 mm, 95% CI [0.46, 1.92], p = 0.001). Age correlated positively with mPAD (r = 0.231, 95% CI [0.028, 0.069], p < 0.0001), and this correlation persisted after adjusting for confounders (r = 0.220, 95% CI [0.019, 0.073], p = 0.001). Ordinal logistic regression indicated 1.28 times higher odds of severe pneumonia with a larger diameter. The study highlights associations between mPAD, pneumonia, and severity, suggesting clinical relevance. Furthermore, the mPAD should be carefully considered in defining severity criteria for adverse outcomes in pneumonia patients. Further research is needed to refine clinical criteria on the basis of these findings.

主肺动脉直径与肺炎严重程度有关。
主肺动脉(肺动脉干)的直径(mPAD)是各种情况下心血管健康和预后的重要指标。其增大与 COVID-19 相关肺炎的死亡率和严重程度增加有关。然而,它与非 COVID 肺炎的相关性仍不确定。本研究旨在确定 mPAD 与非 COVID 肺炎严重程度之间的关系。这项横断面回顾性研究招募了在 2019 年 11 月至 2023 年 2 月期间接受过合格胸部计算机断层扫描的合格参与者。他们被分为肺炎组和非肺炎组。排除标准包括肺动脉高压、多发性创伤、肺部肿瘤或肺动脉狭窄修复史。两组患者均测量了 mPAD,并查阅了病历以确定合并症。肺部 CT 数据按模式和严重程度分类,mPAD 在轴向切片上分叉处垂直于动脉长轴进行测量。对 380 例 CT 扫描(52.6% 为男性,47.4% 为女性;平均年龄为 52.88 ± 17.58)进行分析后发现,肺炎和非肺炎病例的 mPAD 有显著差异(平均差异:1.19 mm,95% CI [0.46,1.92],p = 0.001)。年龄与 mPAD 呈正相关(r = 0.231,95% CI [0.028,0.069],p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Anatomy
Clinical Anatomy 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Anatomy is the Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists. The goal of Clinical Anatomy is to provide a medium for the exchange of current information between anatomists and clinicians. This journal embraces anatomy in all its aspects as applied to medical practice. Furthermore, the journal assists physicians and other health care providers in keeping abreast of new methodologies for patient management and informs educators of new developments in clinical anatomy and teaching techniques. Clinical Anatomy publishes original and review articles of scientific, clinical, and educational interest. Papers covering the application of anatomic principles to the solution of clinical problems and/or the application of clinical observations to expand anatomic knowledge are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信