Knowledge Graphs in Pharmacovigilance: A Scoping Review

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
{"title":"Knowledge Graphs in Pharmacovigilance: A Scoping Review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To critically assess the role and added value of knowledge graphs in pharmacovigilance, focusing on their ability to predict adverse drug reactions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic scoping review was conducted in which detailed information, including objectives, technology, data sources, methodology, and performance metrics, were extracted from a set of peer-reviewed publications reporting the use of knowledge graphs to support pharmacovigilance signal detection.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The review, which included 47 peer-reviewed articles, found knowledge graphs were utilized for detecting/predicting single-drug adverse reactions and drug-drug interactions, with variable reported performance and sparse comparisons to legacy methods.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Research to date suggests that knowledge graphs have the potential to augment predictive signal detection in pharmacovigilance, but further research using more reliable reference sets of adverse drug reactions and comparison with legacy pharmacovigilance methods are needed to more clearly define best practices and to establish their place in holistic pharmacovigilance systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291824001449/pdfft?md5=f9f33cb64cea55fc0e6c0a5062b887ee&pid=1-s2.0-S0149291824001449-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291824001449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To critically assess the role and added value of knowledge graphs in pharmacovigilance, focusing on their ability to predict adverse drug reactions.

Methods

A systematic scoping review was conducted in which detailed information, including objectives, technology, data sources, methodology, and performance metrics, were extracted from a set of peer-reviewed publications reporting the use of knowledge graphs to support pharmacovigilance signal detection.

Findings

The review, which included 47 peer-reviewed articles, found knowledge graphs were utilized for detecting/predicting single-drug adverse reactions and drug-drug interactions, with variable reported performance and sparse comparisons to legacy methods.

Implications

Research to date suggests that knowledge graphs have the potential to augment predictive signal detection in pharmacovigilance, but further research using more reliable reference sets of adverse drug reactions and comparison with legacy pharmacovigilance methods are needed to more clearly define best practices and to establish their place in holistic pharmacovigilance systems.

药物警戒中的知识图谱:范围综述。
目的:严格评估知识图谱在药物警戒中的作用和附加值,重点关注其预测药物不良反应的能力:方法:我们进行了一次系统的范围界定审查,从一系列报道使用知识图谱支持药物警戒信号检测的同行评审出版物中提取了详细信息,包括目标、技术、数据来源、方法和性能指标:综述包括 47 篇同行评议文章,发现知识图谱被用于检测/预测单药不良反应和药物间相互作用,但报告的性能各不相同,与传统方法的比较也很少:迄今为止的研究表明,知识图谱有可能增强药物警戒中的预测信号检测,但还需要使用更可靠的药物不良反应参考集进行进一步研究,并与传统药物警戒方法进行比较,以更明确地定义最佳实践,并确定其在整体药物警戒系统中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信