The Satisfaction and Quality of Life of Patients After Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study Comparing Immediate, Delayed, and Nonreconstructive Outcomes.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Hisham Alghamdi, Amal Alhefdhi, Khalid A Fayi, Sultan F Alshaalan, Abdulaziz K Alsuhaim, Rahaf H Almutairi, Najla Alkilani, Hayfa Aolayan, Mohamed R Awad
{"title":"The Satisfaction and Quality of Life of Patients After Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study Comparing Immediate, Delayed, and Nonreconstructive Outcomes.","authors":"Hisham Alghamdi, Amal Alhefdhi, Khalid A Fayi, Sultan F Alshaalan, Abdulaziz K Alsuhaim, Rahaf H Almutairi, Najla Alkilani, Hayfa Aolayan, Mohamed R Awad","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast reconstruction following mastectomy can be performed through various surgical techniques that prioritize the patient's safety and quality of life. Plastic surgeons are trained to choose the most appropriate surgical approach based on the individual patient's needs and medical history. The safety of the patient is always the primary concern, followed by considerations such as aesthetic outcomes and long-term health implications.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess and document patients' satisfaction and quality of life after breast reconstruction across Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional multicenter study among female patients who underwent mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction between 2015 and 2022. Two hundred eighty patients participated in this study through a call-based Arabic version of the BREAST-Q questionnaire to analyze the quality of their lives and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results showed that patients who underwent delayed reconstruction had lower satisfaction than those who underwent immediate reconstruction. The average BREAST-Q score was lower in patients who used tissue expanders than those with implant-based reconstruction, autologous reconstruction, or combined approaches. Patients who underwent simple mastectomy had lower satisfaction (M = 66.1) than those who had a skin-sparing mastectomy (M = 71.1) and/or nipple-sparing mastectomy (M = 72.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective multicenter study observed a significant association between the time of the reconstructive surgery and patient's satisfaction; patients who underwent immediate reconstruction had higher satisfaction rate. Lower satisfaction rate was associated with tissue expander breast reconstruction. There is a significant association between satisfaction rate and smoking history.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast reconstruction following mastectomy can be performed through various surgical techniques that prioritize the patient's safety and quality of life. Plastic surgeons are trained to choose the most appropriate surgical approach based on the individual patient's needs and medical history. The safety of the patient is always the primary concern, followed by considerations such as aesthetic outcomes and long-term health implications.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess and document patients' satisfaction and quality of life after breast reconstruction across Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional multicenter study among female patients who underwent mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction between 2015 and 2022. Two hundred eighty patients participated in this study through a call-based Arabic version of the BREAST-Q questionnaire to analyze the quality of their lives and satisfaction.

Results: Our results showed that patients who underwent delayed reconstruction had lower satisfaction than those who underwent immediate reconstruction. The average BREAST-Q score was lower in patients who used tissue expanders than those with implant-based reconstruction, autologous reconstruction, or combined approaches. Patients who underwent simple mastectomy had lower satisfaction (M = 66.1) than those who had a skin-sparing mastectomy (M = 71.1) and/or nipple-sparing mastectomy (M = 72.6).

Conclusions: This retrospective multicenter study observed a significant association between the time of the reconstructive surgery and patient's satisfaction; patients who underwent immediate reconstruction had higher satisfaction rate. Lower satisfaction rate was associated with tissue expander breast reconstruction. There is a significant association between satisfaction rate and smoking history.

乳房再造术后患者的满意度和生活质量:乳房再造术后患者的满意度和生活质量:比较即时、延迟和非再造结果的跨部门多中心研究。
背景:乳房切除术后的乳房再造可通过各种手术技术进行,这些技术都以患者的安全和生活质量为优先考虑。整形外科医生接受过培训,可根据患者的个人需求和病史选择最合适的手术方法。患者的安全始终是首要考虑因素,其次才是美学效果和长期健康影响等考虑因素:本研究旨在评估和记录沙特阿拉伯患者在乳房再造术后的满意度和生活质量:这是一项横断面多中心研究,研究对象是 2015 年至 2022 年期间接受乳房切除术并进行或未进行乳房重建的女性患者。280 名患者通过呼叫式阿拉伯语版 BREAST-Q 问卷参与了这项研究,以分析她们的生活质量和满意度:结果:我们的研究结果显示,接受延迟重建的患者的满意度低于接受即刻重建的患者。使用组织扩张器的患者的 BREAST-Q 平均得分低于使用植入物重建、自体重建或联合方法的患者。接受单纯乳房切除术的患者的满意度(M = 66.1)低于接受皮肤保留乳房切除术(M = 71.1)和/或乳头保留乳房切除术(M = 72.6)的患者:这项回顾性多中心研究观察到,重建手术的时间与患者的满意度之间存在显著关联;接受即刻重建的患者满意度更高。组织扩张器乳房再造术的满意度较低。满意度与吸烟史有明显关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信