Maxillary sinus lift augmentation: A randomized clinical trial with histological data comparing deproteinized bovine bone grafting vs graftless procedure with a 5–12-year follow-up

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Daniela Carmagnola DDS, PhD, Alberto Pispero DDS, PhD, Gaia Pellegrini DDS, PhD, Samuele Sutera DDS, PhD, Dolaji Henin DDS, PhD, Giovanni Lodi DDS, PhD, Antonio Achilli DDS, Claudia Dellavia DDS, PhD
{"title":"Maxillary sinus lift augmentation: A randomized clinical trial with histological data comparing deproteinized bovine bone grafting vs graftless procedure with a 5–12-year follow-up","authors":"Daniela Carmagnola DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Alberto Pispero DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Gaia Pellegrini DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Samuele Sutera DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Dolaji Henin DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Giovanni Lodi DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Antonio Achilli DDS,&nbsp;Claudia Dellavia DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1111/cid.13359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Different protocols and procedures for sinus lift and implant placement are available, generally involving the use of grafts to increase the tissue volume and/or prevent the Schneiderian membrane from collapsing. Among xenografts, deproteinised bovine bone graft (DBBP) is frequently used in sinus lift procedures. Leaving an ungrafted space following membrane elevation has proven to have a bony regenerative potential as well. This study aimed to compare the clinical and histological features of sinus lift surgery performed with or without biomaterials.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with severe maxillary posterior atrophy (residual bone height 2–6 mm and residual crest thickness ≥4 mm), and in need of sinus lift surgery to allow the placement of three implants were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. They underwent sinus lifts with DBBP (control) or with a graftless technique (test) and immediate placement of two implants (a mesial and distal one). After 6 months, a bone sample was retrieved from the area between the previously inserted fixtures, and a third, central implant was placed. The collected bone samples were analyzed morphologically and histomorphometrically. The patients were provided with prosthetic restorations after 6 months and followed up for 5–12 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Ten patients were enrolled in the test and nine in the control group. The 6-month follow-up showed in the control group an average augmentation of 10.31 mm (±2.12), while in the test group it was 8.5 mm (±1.41) and a success rate of 96.3% in the control and 86.7% in the test group (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The histological analysis evidenced the presence of new bone tissue surrounded by immature osteoid matrix in the test group, and a variable number of DBBP particles surrounded by an immature woven bone matrix in the control group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The results of the present trial indicate that, with residual bone height of 2–6 mm and residual crest thickness ≥4 mm, sinus lift surgery with or without biomaterials followed by implant restoration, produces similar clinical and histological outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"26 5","pages":"972-985"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13359","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Different protocols and procedures for sinus lift and implant placement are available, generally involving the use of grafts to increase the tissue volume and/or prevent the Schneiderian membrane from collapsing. Among xenografts, deproteinised bovine bone graft (DBBP) is frequently used in sinus lift procedures. Leaving an ungrafted space following membrane elevation has proven to have a bony regenerative potential as well. This study aimed to compare the clinical and histological features of sinus lift surgery performed with or without biomaterials.

Methods

Patients with severe maxillary posterior atrophy (residual bone height 2–6 mm and residual crest thickness ≥4 mm), and in need of sinus lift surgery to allow the placement of three implants were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. They underwent sinus lifts with DBBP (control) or with a graftless technique (test) and immediate placement of two implants (a mesial and distal one). After 6 months, a bone sample was retrieved from the area between the previously inserted fixtures, and a third, central implant was placed. The collected bone samples were analyzed morphologically and histomorphometrically. The patients were provided with prosthetic restorations after 6 months and followed up for 5–12 years.

Results

Ten patients were enrolled in the test and nine in the control group. The 6-month follow-up showed in the control group an average augmentation of 10.31 mm (±2.12), while in the test group it was 8.5 mm (±1.41) and a success rate of 96.3% in the control and 86.7% in the test group (p > 0.05). The histological analysis evidenced the presence of new bone tissue surrounded by immature osteoid matrix in the test group, and a variable number of DBBP particles surrounded by an immature woven bone matrix in the control group.

Conclusion

The results of the present trial indicate that, with residual bone height of 2–6 mm and residual crest thickness ≥4 mm, sinus lift surgery with or without biomaterials followed by implant restoration, produces similar clinical and histological outcomes.

上颌窦提升增量术:一项包含组织学数据的随机临床试验,比较了去蛋白牛骨移植与无移植手术,并进行了 5-12 年的随访。
简介:上颌窦提升术和种植体植入术有不同的方案和程序,一般都需要使用移植物来增加组织体积和/或防止施奈德膜塌陷。在异种移植物中,脱蛋白牛骨移植物(DBBP)经常用于上颌窦提升术。事实证明,在抬高骨膜后留下未移植的空间也具有骨再生的潜力。本研究旨在比较使用或不使用生物材料进行上颌窦提升手术的临床和组织学特征:方法:研究人员选取了上颌后部严重萎缩(残余骨高度为 2-6 毫米,残余嵴厚度≥4 毫米)、需要进行上颌窦提升手术以植入三颗种植体的患者,并将其随机分为两组。他们分别接受了 DBBP(对照组)或无移植技术(试验组)的上颌窦提升术,并立即植入了两颗种植体(中侧和远侧)。6 个月后,从先前植入的固定装置之间的区域采集骨样本,并植入第三个中心种植体。对采集的骨样本进行了形态学和组织形态计量学分析。6 个月后为患者提供修复体,并随访 5-12 年:试验组有 10 名患者,对照组有 9 名患者。6 个月的随访结果显示,对照组的平均增量为 10.31 毫米(±2.12),而试验组为 8.5 毫米(±1.41),对照组的成功率为 96.3%,试验组为 86.7%(P > 0.05)。组织学分析表明,试验组存在由未成熟骨基质包围的新骨组织,而对照组存在由未成熟编织骨基质包围的不同数量的 DBBP 颗粒:本试验结果表明,在残余骨高度为 2-6 毫米、残余嵴厚度≥4 毫米的情况下,使用或不使用生物材料进行上颌窦提升手术,然后进行种植修复,都能产生相似的临床和组织学结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal. The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to: New scientific developments relating to bone Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues Computer aided implant designs Computer aided prosthetic designs Immediate implant loading Immediate implant placement Materials relating to bone induction and conduction New surgical methods relating to implant placement New materials and methods relating to implant restorations Methods for determining implant stability A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信