Hearing Function after CyberKnife for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review.

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-07-05 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1787736
Matheus Pedrosa Tavares, Fayez Bahmad
{"title":"Hearing Function after CyberKnife for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Matheus Pedrosa Tavares, Fayez Bahmad","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  CyberKnife (CK) radiosurgery is a treatment strategy for vestibular schwannoma (VS). <b>Objectives</b>  To evaluate hearing preservation (HP) after CK for VS. <b>Data Synthesis</b>  The study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, and it was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, under number CRD42021250300). The inclusion criteria were based on the population, intervention, comparison, outcome, timing and study design (PICOTS) strategy: population - patients with VS; intervention - CK; Comparison - none; Outcome - serviceable HP defined by Gardner and Robertson as grades I or II, or by the American Academy of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery as classes A or B; timing - mean follow-up longer than 1 year; and study design - retrospective or prospective studies. The exclusion criteria were: studies not published in English; studies published before January 2000 and after October 2021; and studies only including patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 or submitted to a previous treatment. The PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and IBECS databases were used and last searched on October 27th, 2021. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistics. The appraisal checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. A total of 222 studies were analyzed, and 13 were included in the synthesis, which represents 493 participants with serviceable hearing before intervention. The mean HP rate after CK using a random effects model was of 68% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 59-76%) at a mean follow-up of 42.96 months. <b>Conclusion</b>  The longer follow-up period was associated with a lower HP rate after CK radiosurgery for VS in the qualitative synthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"28 3","pages":"e543-e551"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  CyberKnife (CK) radiosurgery is a treatment strategy for vestibular schwannoma (VS). Objectives  To evaluate hearing preservation (HP) after CK for VS. Data Synthesis  The study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, and it was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, under number CRD42021250300). The inclusion criteria were based on the population, intervention, comparison, outcome, timing and study design (PICOTS) strategy: population - patients with VS; intervention - CK; Comparison - none; Outcome - serviceable HP defined by Gardner and Robertson as grades I or II, or by the American Academy of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery as classes A or B; timing - mean follow-up longer than 1 year; and study design - retrospective or prospective studies. The exclusion criteria were: studies not published in English; studies published before January 2000 and after October 2021; and studies only including patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 or submitted to a previous treatment. The PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and IBECS databases were used and last searched on October 27th, 2021. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics. The appraisal checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. A total of 222 studies were analyzed, and 13 were included in the synthesis, which represents 493 participants with serviceable hearing before intervention. The mean HP rate after CK using a random effects model was of 68% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 59-76%) at a mean follow-up of 42.96 months. Conclusion  The longer follow-up period was associated with a lower HP rate after CK radiosurgery for VS in the qualitative synthesis.

前庭许旺瘤赛博刀治疗后的听觉功能:系统性综述。
导言:CyberKnife(CK)放射外科手术是治疗前庭分裂瘤(VS)的一种策略。目的 评估 CK 治疗 VS 后的听力保护(HP)情况。数据综述 本研究按照系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明进行,并在国际系统综述前瞻性注册中心(PROSPERO,编号 CRD42021250300)注册。纳入标准基于人群、干预、比较、结果、时间和研究设计(PICOTS)策略:人群--VS 患者;干预--CK;比较--无;结果--Gardner 和 Robertson 定义为 I 级或 II 级的可用 HP,或美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会定义为 A 级或 B 级的可用 HP;时间--平均随访时间超过 1 年;研究设计--回顾性或前瞻性研究。排除标准为:非英文发表的研究;2000年1月之前和2021年10月之后发表的研究;仅包括2型神经纤维瘤病患者或接受过先前治疗的患者的研究。研究人员使用了PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、LILACS和IBECS数据库,最后一次检索日期为2021年10月27日。统计异质性采用 I 2 统计法进行评估。评估清单用于评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。共分析了 222 项研究,其中 13 项被纳入综合研究,这代表了 493 名干预前听力尚可的参与者。在平均 42.96 个月的随访中,采用随机效应模型计算的 CK 后平均 HP 率为 68%(95% 置信区间 [95%CI]:59-76%)。结论 在定性综述中,较长的随访期与 VS CK 放射手术后较低的 HP 率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信