User engagement, attitudes, and the effectiveness of chatbots as a mental health intervention: A systematic review

Sucharat Limpanopparat, Erin Gibson, Dr Andrew Harris
{"title":"User engagement, attitudes, and the effectiveness of chatbots as a mental health intervention: A systematic review","authors":"Sucharat Limpanopparat,&nbsp;Erin Gibson,&nbsp;Dr Andrew Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In recent years, chatbots developed for mental health intervention purposes have been widely implemented to solve the challenges of workforce shortage and accessibility issues faced by traditional health services. Nevertheless, research assessing the technologies’ potential and risks remains sporadic.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This review aims to synthesise the existing research on engagement, user attitude, and effectiveness of psychological chatbot interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A systematic review was conducted using relevant peer-reviewed literature since 2010. These studies were derived from six databases: PubMed<em>, PsycINFO</em>, <em>Web of</em> <em>Science</em>, <em>Science Direct, Scopus</em> and <em>IEEE Xplore</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Engagement level with chatbots that complied with digital intervention standards, lead to positive mental health outcomes. Although users had some uncertainties about the usability of these tools, positive attitudes towards chatbots regarding user experience and acceptability were frequently identified due to the chatbots' psychological capabilities and unique functions. High levels of outcome efficacy were found for those with depression. The differences in demographics, psychological approaches, and featured technologies could also influence the extent of mental health chatbot performances.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p><em>P</em>ositive attitudes and engagement with chatbots, as well as positive mental health outcomes, shows chatbot technology is a promising modality for mental health intervention. However, implementing them amongst some demographics or with novel features should be carefully considered. Further research using mainstream mental health chatbots and evaluating them simultaneously with standardised measures of engagement, user attitude, and effectiveness is necessary for intervention development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000410/pdfft?md5=28fa4639b941c7cab725c225999b1bd0&pid=1-s2.0-S2949882124000410-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In recent years, chatbots developed for mental health intervention purposes have been widely implemented to solve the challenges of workforce shortage and accessibility issues faced by traditional health services. Nevertheless, research assessing the technologies’ potential and risks remains sporadic.

Purpose

This review aims to synthesise the existing research on engagement, user attitude, and effectiveness of psychological chatbot interventions.

Method

A systematic review was conducted using relevant peer-reviewed literature since 2010. These studies were derived from six databases: PubMed, PsycINFOWeb of ScienceScience Direct, Scopus and IEEE Xplore.

Results

Engagement level with chatbots that complied with digital intervention standards, lead to positive mental health outcomes. Although users had some uncertainties about the usability of these tools, positive attitudes towards chatbots regarding user experience and acceptability were frequently identified due to the chatbots' psychological capabilities and unique functions. High levels of outcome efficacy were found for those with depression. The differences in demographics, psychological approaches, and featured technologies could also influence the extent of mental health chatbot performances.

Conclusion

Positive attitudes and engagement with chatbots, as well as positive mental health outcomes, shows chatbot technology is a promising modality for mental health intervention. However, implementing them amongst some demographics or with novel features should be carefully considered. Further research using mainstream mental health chatbots and evaluating them simultaneously with standardised measures of engagement, user attitude, and effectiveness is necessary for intervention development.

聊天机器人作为心理健康干预措施的用户参与度、态度和有效性:系统回顾
背景近年来,以心理健康干预为目的开发的聊天机器人得到广泛应用,以解决传统医疗服务面临的劳动力短缺和可及性问题。本综述旨在综合现有的关于心理聊天机器人干预的参与度、用户态度和有效性的研究。这些研究来自六个数据库:PubMed、PsycINFO、Web of Science、Science Direct、Scopus 和 IEEE Xplore。ResultsEngagement level with chatbots that comply with digital intervention standards, lead to positive mental health outcomes.虽然用户对这些工具的可用性存在一些不确定性,但由于聊天机器人的心理能力和独特功能,用户经常对聊天机器人的用户体验和可接受性持积极态度。抑郁症患者的疗效水平很高。人口统计学、心理学方法和特色技术的差异也会影响心理健康聊天机器人的表现程度。 结论对聊天机器人的积极态度和参与度以及积极的心理健康结果表明,聊天机器人技术是一种很有前景的心理健康干预方式。然而,在某些人群中使用聊天机器人或使用新功能时应慎重考虑。有必要使用主流心理健康聊天机器人开展进一步研究,并同时使用参与度、用户态度和有效性的标准化测量方法对其进行评估,以促进干预措施的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信