{"title":"Risk of stroke development following retinal vein occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and cerebrovascular disease share common risk factors and may be independently associated; however, the strength and nature of this association remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, informed by studies from PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar until January 6, 2024, aimed to clarify this relationship. Eligible studies included cohorts observing stroke incidence in RVO patients for over a year. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random-effects models, with subgroup analyses evaluating associations between RVO types (central and branch) and stroke subtypes (ischemic and hemorrhagic). Ten cohort studies with a total of 428,650 participants (86,299 RVO patients) were included. Compared to controls, RVO patients exhibited a significantly increased risk of stroke (pooled risk ratio [RR]=1.38, 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI)=1.34–1.41). Subgroup analyses indicated elevated risk for both ischemic (RR=1.37, 95 %CI=1.32–1.42) and hemorrhagic (RR=1.55, 95 %CI=1.08–2.22) strokes in RVO patients. Additionally, both central (RR=1.50, 95 %CI=1.27–1.78) and branch (RR=1.41, 95 %CI=1.32–1.50) RVO were associated with stroke risk. Sensitivity analyses confirmed consistent results across various criteria, and funnel plots indicated no publication bias. RVO significantly increases the risk of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, regardless of RVO type, suggesting a strong independent association between these conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039625724000742","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and cerebrovascular disease share common risk factors and may be independently associated; however, the strength and nature of this association remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, informed by studies from PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar until January 6, 2024, aimed to clarify this relationship. Eligible studies included cohorts observing stroke incidence in RVO patients for over a year. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random-effects models, with subgroup analyses evaluating associations between RVO types (central and branch) and stroke subtypes (ischemic and hemorrhagic). Ten cohort studies with a total of 428,650 participants (86,299 RVO patients) were included. Compared to controls, RVO patients exhibited a significantly increased risk of stroke (pooled risk ratio [RR]=1.38, 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI)=1.34–1.41). Subgroup analyses indicated elevated risk for both ischemic (RR=1.37, 95 %CI=1.32–1.42) and hemorrhagic (RR=1.55, 95 %CI=1.08–2.22) strokes in RVO patients. Additionally, both central (RR=1.50, 95 %CI=1.27–1.78) and branch (RR=1.41, 95 %CI=1.32–1.50) RVO were associated with stroke risk. Sensitivity analyses confirmed consistent results across various criteria, and funnel plots indicated no publication bias. RVO significantly increases the risk of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, regardless of RVO type, suggesting a strong independent association between these conditions.
期刊介绍:
Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.