Risk of TIRADS-based inappropriate FNAC in autonomous thyroid nodules is clinically negligible.

Abstract

Objective: Thyroid nodule (TN) is usually managed according to Thyroid Imaging And Reporting Data Systems (TIRADS) with the major aim to reduce as much as possible unnecessary fine-needle aspiration cytologies (UN-FNACs). Since the assessment of autonomously functioning thyroid nodule (AFTN) according to TIRADS is heterogeneous, that virtually benign entity may increase the rate of UN-FNAC. This study retrospectively analyzed the appropriateness of TIRADS-based FNAC indication in AFTNs, also looking at the impact of TSH and nodule size.

Methods: Cases diagnosed with AFTN on scintigraphy were searched. Patients who had undergone AFTN treatment, were on medications or supplementation that could affect thyroid function, or had multiple AFTNs were excluded. The AFTNs were assessed according to ACR-TIRADS.

Results: Forty-eight AFTNs were included of which 37.5% had FNAC indication according to TIRADS. The FNAC indication rate in the case of TSH lower than 0.4 mIU/L was significantly higher than in other cases (P = 0.0078). The most accurate TSH cut-off and AFTN size associated with UN-FNAC were ≤ 0.41 mIU/L and > 22 mm, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that both TSH and nodule size were independent predictors of UN-FNAC with OR of 6.65 and 6.46, respectively. According to these data, the rate of FNAC indication dropped to 4.16%.

Conclusion: Inappropriate FNACs in AFTNs are primarily observed in patients with low TSH and large AFTN. Since these cases typically undergo scintigraphy, the risk of TIRADS-based UN-FNAC is clinically negligible. There is no need for integrating other imaging procedures into the TIRADS model.