Patient-Experience of Trapeziectomy for Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis in Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia no Tourniquet, 2-Year Follow-up.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
D Reiser, V Brandt, M Sagerfors
{"title":"Patient-Experience of Trapeziectomy for Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis in Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia no Tourniquet, 2-Year Follow-up.","authors":"D Reiser, V Brandt, M Sagerfors","doi":"10.55095/achot2024/017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the patient experience of trapeziectomy under WALANT for trapeziometacarpal joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis (OA) in a prospective study with 2-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 23 patients with TMJ OA undergoing trapeziectomy with WALANT. All patients were seen by a hand therapist preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. At each visit, VAS pain scores, thumb range of motion, grip strength, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were assessed. The Picker Patient Experience (PPE-15) questionnaire was administered within 2 weeks of surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 23 patients completed the PPE-15 questionnaire. Their mean age was 64 years. The 21 patients who remained at the 24-month follow-up all said they would choose the same anaesthesia method again. At this follow-up, VAS pain scores, thumb range of motion, key pinch grip and DASH scores had improved significantly, while thumb opposition and hand grip strength remained largely unchanged. The majority of patients felt well informed before and during the procedure, and all patients rated pain relief as good or satisfactory. Nearly 40% of patients reported receiving inadequate information about the postoperative medications.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patients have a positive attitude to trapeziectomy with WALANT, and seem to prefer WALANT over other methods of anaesthesia. Trapeziectomy with WALANT for TMJ OA is a safe procedure and appears to give a functional outcome similar to trapeziectomy under general anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trapeziectomy with WALANT for TMJ OA is safe, preferred by patients and has similar clinical outcome as trapeziectomy in general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>trapeziectomy, osteoarthritis, WALANT.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":"91 3","pages":"175-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2024/017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this study was to assess the patient experience of trapeziectomy under WALANT for trapeziometacarpal joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis (OA) in a prospective study with 2-year follow-up.

Material and methods: The study included 23 patients with TMJ OA undergoing trapeziectomy with WALANT. All patients were seen by a hand therapist preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. At each visit, VAS pain scores, thumb range of motion, grip strength, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were assessed. The Picker Patient Experience (PPE-15) questionnaire was administered within 2 weeks of surgery.

Results: All 23 patients completed the PPE-15 questionnaire. Their mean age was 64 years. The 21 patients who remained at the 24-month follow-up all said they would choose the same anaesthesia method again. At this follow-up, VAS pain scores, thumb range of motion, key pinch grip and DASH scores had improved significantly, while thumb opposition and hand grip strength remained largely unchanged. The majority of patients felt well informed before and during the procedure, and all patients rated pain relief as good or satisfactory. Nearly 40% of patients reported receiving inadequate information about the postoperative medications.

Discussion: Patients have a positive attitude to trapeziectomy with WALANT, and seem to prefer WALANT over other methods of anaesthesia. Trapeziectomy with WALANT for TMJ OA is a safe procedure and appears to give a functional outcome similar to trapeziectomy under general anaesthesia.

Conclusions: Trapeziectomy with WALANT for TMJ OA is safe, preferred by patients and has similar clinical outcome as trapeziectomy in general anesthesia.

Key words: trapeziectomy, osteoarthritis, WALANT.

在无止血带宽醒局部麻醉下进行梯形骨切除术治疗梯形掌骨骨关节炎的患者体验,2 年随访。
研究目的本研究旨在通过一项为期2年的前瞻性研究,评估在WALANT下进行梯形骨切除术治疗梯形掌关节骨性关节炎(OA)的患者体验:研究对象包括23名接受WALANT手术的颞下颌关节OA患者。所有患者在术前、术后 3 个月、12 个月和 24 个月都接受了手部治疗师的检查。每次就诊时,都会对 VAS 疼痛评分、拇指活动范围、握力和手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)评分进行评估。术后两周内进行了皮克患者体验(PPE-15)问卷调查:所有 23 位患者都填写了 PPE-15 问卷。他们的平均年龄为 64 岁。在 24 个月的随访中,21 名患者均表示会再次选择相同的麻醉方法。在此次随访中,VAS 疼痛评分、拇指活动范围、键捏握力和 DASH 评分均有明显改善,而拇指对抗力和手部握力则基本保持不变。大多数患者在手术前和手术过程中都感到信息畅通,所有患者都将疼痛缓解情况评为良好或令人满意。近 40% 的患者表示没有获得足够的术后用药信息:讨论:患者对使用 WALANT 进行梯形切除术持积极态度,与其他麻醉方法相比,他们似乎更喜欢使用 WALANT。使用WALANT进行颞下颌关节OA的梯形切除术是一种安全的手术,其功能效果似乎与全身麻醉下的梯形切除术相似:结论:使用WALANT进行颞下颌关节OA的梯形切除术是安全的,受到患者的青睐,其临床效果与全身麻醉下的梯形切除术相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信